Medication safety strategies in European adult, paediatric, and neonatal intensive care units: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Shahd Abdelaziz, Angela Amigoni, Minna Kurttila, Raisa Laaksonen, Virginia Silvari, Bryony Dean Franklin
{"title":"Medication safety strategies in European adult, paediatric, and neonatal intensive care units: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Shahd Abdelaziz, Angela Amigoni, Minna Kurttila, Raisa Laaksonen, Virginia Silvari, Bryony Dean Franklin","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are potentially more vulnerable to medication errors than patients admitted to general wards. However, little is known about medication safety strategies used in European ICUs. Our objectives were to explore the strategies being used and being planned within European ICUs, to identify areas of variation, and to inform recommendations to improve medication safety in this patient group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We distributed an online survey, in seven European languages, via professional networks and social media. The survey explored a range of medication safety strategies and whether they were in use (and if so, whether fully or partially implemented) or being planned. Demographic information about respondents and their ICUs was also captured. A descriptive analysis was conducted, which included exploring geographical variation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained 587 valid responses from 32 different countries, with 317 (54%) completed by pharmacy staff. Medication safety practices most commonly implemented were patients' allergies being visible for all staff involved in their care (fully implemented in 382 (65%) of respondents' ICUs), standardised emergency medication stored in a fixed place (337, 57%), and use of standardised medication concentrations for commonly used intravenous infusions (330, 56%). Electronic prescribing systems were fully implemented in 310 (53%). A pharmacist was reported to be fully implemented in 181 (31%) of ICUs, of which there was 126 (70%) where there was a pharmacist review of all ordered medication five days per week. Critical care pharmacists were most common in Northern European ICUs (fully implemented to ICUs in 102, 50%) and electronic prescribing in Western Europe (108, 65%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is considerable variation in medication safety strategies used within European ICUs, both between and within geographical areas. Our findings may be helpful to ICU staff in identifying strategies that should be considered for implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are potentially more vulnerable to medication errors than patients admitted to general wards. However, little is known about medication safety strategies used in European ICUs. Our objectives were to explore the strategies being used and being planned within European ICUs, to identify areas of variation, and to inform recommendations to improve medication safety in this patient group.

Methods: We distributed an online survey, in seven European languages, via professional networks and social media. The survey explored a range of medication safety strategies and whether they were in use (and if so, whether fully or partially implemented) or being planned. Demographic information about respondents and their ICUs was also captured. A descriptive analysis was conducted, which included exploring geographical variation.

Results: We obtained 587 valid responses from 32 different countries, with 317 (54%) completed by pharmacy staff. Medication safety practices most commonly implemented were patients' allergies being visible for all staff involved in their care (fully implemented in 382 (65%) of respondents' ICUs), standardised emergency medication stored in a fixed place (337, 57%), and use of standardised medication concentrations for commonly used intravenous infusions (330, 56%). Electronic prescribing systems were fully implemented in 310 (53%). A pharmacist was reported to be fully implemented in 181 (31%) of ICUs, of which there was 126 (70%) where there was a pharmacist review of all ordered medication five days per week. Critical care pharmacists were most common in Northern European ICUs (fully implemented to ICUs in 102, 50%) and electronic prescribing in Western Europe (108, 65%).

Conclusions: There is considerable variation in medication safety strategies used within European ICUs, both between and within geographical areas. Our findings may be helpful to ICU staff in identifying strategies that should be considered for implementation.

欧洲成人、儿科和新生儿重症监护病房的用药安全策略:横断面调查。
目的:与普通病房的病人相比,重症监护病房(ICU)的病人更容易出现用药错误。然而,人们对欧洲重症监护病房使用的用药安全策略知之甚少。我们的目标是探索欧洲重症监护病房正在使用和计划使用的策略,找出存在差异的领域,并提出相关建议,以改善这一患者群体的用药安全:我们通过专业网络和社交媒体分发了一份七种欧洲语言的在线调查。该调查探讨了一系列用药安全策略,以及这些策略是否正在使用(如果正在使用,是完全实施还是部分实施)或正在计划中。调查还收集了受访者及其所在 ICU 的人口统计学信息。我们进行了描述性分析,其中包括探讨地域差异:我们收到了来自 32 个不同国家的 587 份有效问卷,其中 317 份(54%)由药房工作人员填写。最常实施的用药安全措施包括:所有参与护理的工作人员都能看到患者的过敏史(382 个受访 ICU(65%)完全实施)、在固定地点存放标准化的急救药物(337 个,57%),以及在常用静脉输液中使用标准化的药物浓度(330 个,56%)。有 310 家(53%)完全使用了电子处方系统。据报告,有 181 个(31%)重症监护病房完全配备了药剂师,其中有 126 个(70%)重症监护病房的药剂师每周五天对所有订购药物进行审核。重症监护药剂师在北欧的重症监护病房中最为常见(102 个重症监护病房全面实施,占 50%),电子处方在西欧的重症监护病房中最为常见(108 个重症监护病房,占 65%):欧洲重症监护病房在用药安全策略方面存在很大差异,在不同地区之间和地区内部都是如此。我们的研究结果可能有助于 ICU 工作人员确定应考虑实施的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信