Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Quality Criteria Checklist: An International Consensus Statement on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Imaging and Measurement.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mohammad I Hirzallah, Piergiorgio Lochner, Muhammad Ubaid Hafeez, Andrew G Lee, Christos Krogias, Deepa Dongarwar, Nicholas D Hartman, Michael Ertl, Chiara Robba, Branko Malojcic, Jurgita Valaikiene, Aarti Sarwal, Ryan Hakimi, Felix Schlachetzki
{"title":"Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Quality Criteria Checklist: An International Consensus Statement on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Imaging and Measurement.","authors":"Mohammad I Hirzallah, Piergiorgio Lochner, Muhammad Ubaid Hafeez, Andrew G Lee, Christos Krogias, Deepa Dongarwar, Nicholas D Hartman, Michael Ertl, Chiara Robba, Branko Malojcic, Jurgita Valaikiene, Aarti Sarwal, Ryan Hakimi, Felix Schlachetzki","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To standardize optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) and improve its research and clinical utility by developing the ONSD POCUS Quality Criteria Checklist (ONSD POCUS QCC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three rounds of modified Delphi consensus process and three rounds of asynchronous discussions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online surveys and anonymous asynchronous discussion.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Expert panelists were identified according to their expertise in ONSD research, publication records, education, and clinical use. A total of 52 panelists participated in the Delphi process.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Three Delphi rounds and three asynchronous discussion rounds generated consensus on quality criteria (QC). This started with 29 QC in addition to other QC proposed by expert panelists. The QC items were categorized into probe selection, safety, body position, imaging, measurement, and research considerations. At the conclusion of the study, 28 QC reached consensus to include in the final ONSD POCUS QCC. These QC were then reorganized, edited, and consolidated into 23 QC that were reviewed and approved by the panelists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ONSD POCUS QCC standardizes ONSD ultrasound imaging and measurement based on international consensus. This can establish ONSD ultrasound in clinical research and improve its utility in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To standardize optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) and improve its research and clinical utility by developing the ONSD POCUS Quality Criteria Checklist (ONSD POCUS QCC).

Design: Three rounds of modified Delphi consensus process and three rounds of asynchronous discussions.

Setting: Online surveys and anonymous asynchronous discussion.

Subjects: Expert panelists were identified according to their expertise in ONSD research, publication records, education, and clinical use. A total of 52 panelists participated in the Delphi process.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Three Delphi rounds and three asynchronous discussion rounds generated consensus on quality criteria (QC). This started with 29 QC in addition to other QC proposed by expert panelists. The QC items were categorized into probe selection, safety, body position, imaging, measurement, and research considerations. At the conclusion of the study, 28 QC reached consensus to include in the final ONSD POCUS QCC. These QC were then reorganized, edited, and consolidated into 23 QC that were reviewed and approved by the panelists.

Conclusions: ONSD POCUS QCC standardizes ONSD ultrasound imaging and measurement based on international consensus. This can establish ONSD ultrasound in clinical research and improve its utility in clinical practice.

视神经鞘直径护理点超声成像质量标准检查表:视神经鞘直径成像和测量国际共识声明》。
目标:通过制定视神经鞘直径(ONSD)床旁超声检查(ONSD POCUS)质量标准检查表(ONSD POCUS QCC),规范视神经鞘直径(ONSD)床旁超声检查(ONSD POCUS),提高其研究和临床实用性:设计:三轮改良德尔菲共识流程和三轮异步讨论:在线调查和匿名异步讨论:专家小组成员是根据他们在 ONSD 研究、出版记录、教育和临床应用方面的专业知识确定的。共有 52 位专家组成员参与了德尔菲过程:测量和主要结果三轮德尔菲讨论和三轮异步讨论就质量标准(QC)达成了共识。除专家小组成员提出的其他 QC 外,还首先提出了 29 项 QC。质量控制项目分为探头选择、安全性、体位、成像、测量和研究注意事项。研究结束时,28 项 QC 达成共识,纳入最终的 ONSD POCUS QCC。然后,这些 QC 经过重新组织、编辑,合并成 23 个 QC,并由专家组成员审查和批准:结论:ONSD POCUS QCC 基于国际共识对 ONSD 超声成像和测量进行了标准化。结论:ONSD POCUS QCC 在国际共识的基础上对 ONSD 超声波成像和测量进行了标准化,这可以确立 ONSD 超声波在临床研究中的地位并提高其在临床实践中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信