Clinical performance of fecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, and hemoglobin for evaluating the disease activity of IBD and detecting colorectal tumors

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.13077
Tsukasa Yamakawa, Takakazu Miyake, Yoshihiro Yokoyama, Tomoe Kazama, Yuki Hayashi, Daisuke Hirayama, Shinji Yoshii, Hiro-o Yamano, Satoshi Takahashi, Hiroshi Nakase
{"title":"Clinical performance of fecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, and hemoglobin for evaluating the disease activity of IBD and detecting colorectal tumors","authors":"Tsukasa Yamakawa,&nbsp;Takakazu Miyake,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Yokoyama,&nbsp;Tomoe Kazama,&nbsp;Yuki Hayashi,&nbsp;Daisuke Hirayama,&nbsp;Shinji Yoshii,&nbsp;Hiro-o Yamano,&nbsp;Satoshi Takahashi,&nbsp;Hiroshi Nakase","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.13077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Recently, noninvasive fecal markers have been used as indicators of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a clinical validation study to measure fecal calprotectin (Cp), lactoferrin (Lf), and hemoglobin (Hb) levels using an all-in-one kit in patients with IBD and colorectal tumors and aimed to clarify the utility of these fecal markers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, 104 patients were analyzed, including 25 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), 20 with Crohn's disease (CD), 48 with colorectal tumors, and 13 healthy controls (HC). Of the 48 patients with colorectal tumors, 14 had invasive cancer. We validated the utility of fecal Cp, Lf, and Hb levels by simultaneously measuring fecal markers in patients with IBD and colorectal tumors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fecal Cp and Lf had almost equivalent abilities in detecting clinical remission in patients with UC; however, fecal Cp was slightly superior to Lf. Regarding colorectal tumors, fecal Cp and Lf levels tended to be higher in patients with adenomas and colorectal cancer than in HCs. Although fecal Hb alone had the best sensitivity and specificity for detecting colorectal cancer, it had relatively low sensitivity for detecting advanced neoplasms and colorectal cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Fecal Cp and Lf can be used as almost equivalent biomarkers to assess the clinical activity in patients with UC. Fecal Hb is the most useful marker for screening colorectal cancer; however, adding fecal Cp and Lf may compensate for the low sensitivity of detecting for advanced colorectal tumors based on Hb alone.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.13077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.13077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim

Recently, noninvasive fecal markers have been used as indicators of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a clinical validation study to measure fecal calprotectin (Cp), lactoferrin (Lf), and hemoglobin (Hb) levels using an all-in-one kit in patients with IBD and colorectal tumors and aimed to clarify the utility of these fecal markers.

Methods

In this study, 104 patients were analyzed, including 25 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), 20 with Crohn's disease (CD), 48 with colorectal tumors, and 13 healthy controls (HC). Of the 48 patients with colorectal tumors, 14 had invasive cancer. We validated the utility of fecal Cp, Lf, and Hb levels by simultaneously measuring fecal markers in patients with IBD and colorectal tumors.

Results

Fecal Cp and Lf had almost equivalent abilities in detecting clinical remission in patients with UC; however, fecal Cp was slightly superior to Lf. Regarding colorectal tumors, fecal Cp and Lf levels tended to be higher in patients with adenomas and colorectal cancer than in HCs. Although fecal Hb alone had the best sensitivity and specificity for detecting colorectal cancer, it had relatively low sensitivity for detecting advanced neoplasms and colorectal cancer.

Conclusion

Fecal Cp and Lf can be used as almost equivalent biomarkers to assess the clinical activity in patients with UC. Fecal Hb is the most useful marker for screening colorectal cancer; however, adding fecal Cp and Lf may compensate for the low sensitivity of detecting for advanced colorectal tumors based on Hb alone.

Abstract Image

粪便钙蛋白、乳铁蛋白和血红蛋白在评估 IBD 疾病活动性和检测结肠直肠肿瘤方面的临床表现
背景和目的 最近,无创粪便标记物被用作炎症性肠病(IBD)患者肠道炎症的指标。我们开展了一项临床验证研究,使用一体化试剂盒测量 IBD 和结直肠肿瘤患者的粪便钙蛋白(Cp)、乳铁蛋白(Lf)和血红蛋白(Hb)水平,旨在明确这些粪便标记物的效用。 方法 本研究分析了 104 名患者,包括 25 名溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者、20 名克罗恩病(CD)患者、48 名结直肠肿瘤患者和 13 名健康对照组(HC)患者。在 48 名结肠直肠肿瘤患者中,14 人患有浸润性癌症。我们通过同时测量 IBD 和结直肠肿瘤患者的粪便标记物,验证了粪便 Cp、Lf 和 Hb 水平的实用性。 结果 在检测 UC 患者的临床缓解方面,粪便 Cp 和 Lf 的能力几乎相当;但粪便 Cp 略优于 Lf。在结直肠肿瘤方面,腺瘤和结直肠癌患者的粪便Cp和Lf水平往往高于HC患者。虽然粪便 Hb 单独检测结直肠癌的灵敏度和特异性最高,但检测晚期肿瘤和结直肠癌的灵敏度相对较低。 结论 粪便 Cp 和 Lf 几乎可以作为同等的生物标记物来评估 UC 患者的临床活动。粪便 Hb 是筛查结直肠癌最有用的标志物;但是,如果增加粪便 Cp 和 Lf,则可弥补仅靠 Hb 检测晚期结直肠肿瘤灵敏度低的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信