Roles of spectral dual-layer CT, D-dimer concentration, and COVID-19 pneumonia in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tomáš Jůza , Vlastimil Válek , Daniel Vlk , Marek Dostál , Tomáš Andrašina
{"title":"Roles of spectral dual-layer CT, D-dimer concentration, and COVID-19 pneumonia in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism","authors":"Tomáš Jůza ,&nbsp;Vlastimil Válek ,&nbsp;Daniel Vlk ,&nbsp;Marek Dostál ,&nbsp;Tomáš Andrašina","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To demonstrate advantages of spectral dual-layer computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE). To compare D-dimer values in patients with PE and concomitant COVID-19 pneumonia to those in patients without PE and COVID-19 pneumonia. To compare D-dimer values in cases of minor versus extensive PE.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A monocentric retrospective study of 1500 CT pulmonary angiographies (CTPAs). Three groups of 500 consecutive examinations: 1) using conventional multidetector CT (CTC), 2) using spectral dual-layer CT (CTS), and 3) of COVID-19 pneumonia patients using spectral dual-layer CT (COV). Only patients with known D-dimer levels were enrolled in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Prevalence of inconclusive PE findings differed significantly between CTS and CTC (0.8 % vs. 5.4 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). In all groups, D-dimer levels were significantly higher in PE positive patients than in patients without PE (CTC, 8.04 vs. 3.05 mg/L; CTS, 6.92 vs. 2.57 mg/L; COV, 10.26 vs. 2.72 mg/L, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). There were also statistically significant differences in D-dimer values between minor and extensive PE in the groups negative for COVID-19 (CTC, 5.16 vs. 8.98 mg/L; CTS 3.52 vs. 9.27 mg/L, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The lowest recorded D-dimer value for proven PE in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was 1.19 mg/L.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CTPAs using spectral dual-layer CT reduce the number of inconclusive PE findings. Plasma D-dimer concentration increases with extent of PE. Cut-off value of D-dimer with 100 % sensitivity for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia could be doubled to 1.0 mg/L. This threshold would have saved 110 (22 %) examinations in our cohort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000303/pdfft?md5=62989ee72eca53a148c6fa9194a9f0ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000303-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To demonstrate advantages of spectral dual-layer computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE). To compare D-dimer values in patients with PE and concomitant COVID-19 pneumonia to those in patients without PE and COVID-19 pneumonia. To compare D-dimer values in cases of minor versus extensive PE.

Methods

A monocentric retrospective study of 1500 CT pulmonary angiographies (CTPAs). Three groups of 500 consecutive examinations: 1) using conventional multidetector CT (CTC), 2) using spectral dual-layer CT (CTS), and 3) of COVID-19 pneumonia patients using spectral dual-layer CT (COV). Only patients with known D-dimer levels were enrolled in the study.

Results

Prevalence of inconclusive PE findings differed significantly between CTS and CTC (0.8 % vs. 5.4 %, p < 0.001). In all groups, D-dimer levels were significantly higher in PE positive patients than in patients without PE (CTC, 8.04 vs. 3.05 mg/L; CTS, 6.92 vs. 2.57 mg/L; COV, 10.26 vs. 2.72 mg/L, p < 0.001). There were also statistically significant differences in D-dimer values between minor and extensive PE in the groups negative for COVID-19 (CTC, 5.16 vs. 8.98 mg/L; CTS 3.52 vs. 9.27 mg/L, p < 0.001). The lowest recorded D-dimer value for proven PE in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was 1.19 mg/L.

Conclusion

CTPAs using spectral dual-layer CT reduce the number of inconclusive PE findings. Plasma D-dimer concentration increases with extent of PE. Cut-off value of D-dimer with 100 % sensitivity for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia could be doubled to 1.0 mg/L. This threshold would have saved 110 (22 %) examinations in our cohort.

光谱双层 CT、D-二聚体浓度和 COVID-19 肺炎在诊断肺栓塞中的作用
目的 展示光谱双层计算机断层扫描(CT)在诊断肺栓塞(PE)方面的优势。比较患有 PE 和伴有 COVID-19 肺炎的患者与未患有 PE 和 COVID-19 肺炎的患者的 D-二聚体值。方法对 1500 例 CT 肺血管造影(CTPA)进行单中心回顾性研究。三组 500 例连续检查:1)使用传统多载体 CT (CTC);2)使用光谱双层 CT (CTS);3)对 COVID-19 肺炎患者使用光谱双层 CT (COV)。只有已知 D-二聚体水平的患者才被纳入研究。结果CTS 和 CTC 的 PE 检查结果不确定的发生率有显著差异(0.8% vs. 5.4%,p <0.001)。在所有组别中,PE 阳性患者的 D-二聚体水平明显高于无 PE 患者(CTC,8.04 vs. 3.05 mg/L;CTS,6.92 vs. 2.57 mg/L;COV,10.26 vs. 2.72 mg/L,p <0.001)。在 COVID-19 阴性组中,轻度 PE 和重度 PE 的 D-二聚体值差异也有统计学意义(CTC,5.16 vs. 8.98 mg/L;CTS,3.52 vs. 9.27 mg/L,p < 0.001)。COVID-19肺炎患者经证实的PE的最低D-二聚体值为1.19 mg/L。血浆 D-二聚体浓度随 PE 范围的扩大而增加。对 COVID-19 肺炎患者 100% 敏感的 D-二聚体临界值可提高一倍至 1.0 mg/L。在我们的队列中,这一临界值可节省 110 次(22%)检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信