The experiences of family caregiver and clinician facilitators implementing a co-delivered acceptance and commitment training (ACT) intervention

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Johanna Lake , Kenneth Po-Lun Fung , Lee Steel , Carly Magnacca , Katie Cardiff , Kendra Thomson , Nicole Bobbette , Brianne Redquest , Sacha Bailey , Yona Lunsky
{"title":"The experiences of family caregiver and clinician facilitators implementing a co-delivered acceptance and commitment training (ACT) intervention","authors":"Johanna Lake ,&nbsp;Kenneth Po-Lun Fung ,&nbsp;Lee Steel ,&nbsp;Carly Magnacca ,&nbsp;Katie Cardiff ,&nbsp;Kendra Thomson ,&nbsp;Nicole Bobbette ,&nbsp;Brianne Redquest ,&nbsp;Sacha Bailey ,&nbsp;Yona Lunsky","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Family caregivers of people with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDDs) experience high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, yet few interventions target their wellbeing. Moreover, most evidence-based interventions fail to include caregivers in their design and delivery despite evidence that caregivers can play a vital role in enhancing the success of interventions to other caregivers. The present study explored the experiences of caregivers and clinicians who worked in partnership to co-deliver an Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACT) intervention to caregivers of people with NDDs in the community.</p><p>Caregiver and clinician facilitators completed an open-ended survey asking about their experiences co-facilitating an evidence-based, group ACT intervention. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Elements of successful partnerships, the benefits and challenges co-leading the intervention, and considerations for future implementation efforts were explored. Findings revealed the complementary contributions of facilitators’ diverse perspectives, experiences and skills, as well as how regular communication, trust, and flexibility supported successful partnerships. Benefits of co-facilitating included connection with others and personal growth, while challenges included emotional costs, capacity and compensation. Taken together, results highlight ways to support the successful implementation of an ACT intervention co-led by caregivers and clinicians, as well as other partnered interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100780"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family caregivers of people with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDDs) experience high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, yet few interventions target their wellbeing. Moreover, most evidence-based interventions fail to include caregivers in their design and delivery despite evidence that caregivers can play a vital role in enhancing the success of interventions to other caregivers. The present study explored the experiences of caregivers and clinicians who worked in partnership to co-deliver an Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACT) intervention to caregivers of people with NDDs in the community.

Caregiver and clinician facilitators completed an open-ended survey asking about their experiences co-facilitating an evidence-based, group ACT intervention. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Elements of successful partnerships, the benefits and challenges co-leading the intervention, and considerations for future implementation efforts were explored. Findings revealed the complementary contributions of facilitators’ diverse perspectives, experiences and skills, as well as how regular communication, trust, and flexibility supported successful partnerships. Benefits of co-facilitating included connection with others and personal growth, while challenges included emotional costs, capacity and compensation. Taken together, results highlight ways to support the successful implementation of an ACT intervention co-led by caregivers and clinicians, as well as other partnered interventions.

家庭照护者和临床医生促进者实施共同提供的接纳与承诺训练(ACT)干预的经验
神经发育障碍(NDDs)患者的家庭照护者承受着很大的压力、焦虑和抑郁,但针对他们福祉的干预措施却寥寥无几。此外,尽管有证据表明照护者在提高对其他照护者的干预成功率方面可以发挥至关重要的作用,但大多数循证干预措施都没有将照护者纳入其设计和实施过程中。本研究探讨了护理人员与临床医生合作,共同为社区中 NDD 患者的护理人员提供接纳与承诺训练 (ACT) 干预的经验。护理人员和临床医生主持人填写了一份开放式调查问卷,询问他们共同促进循证小组 ACT 干预的经验。对数据进行了主题分析。对成功合作关系的要素、共同引导干预的益处和挑战以及未来实施工作的注意事项进行了探讨。研究结果表明,促进者的不同观点、经验和技能具有互补性,定期沟通、信任和灵活性也有助于成功的伙伴关系。共同促进的益处包括与他人的联系和个人成长,而挑战则包括情感成本、能力和补偿。综上所述,研究结果强调了支持成功实施由护理人员和临床医生共同领导的 ACT 干预以及其他合作干预的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信