Evaluation of the carbon reduction benefits of adopting the compression cast technology in concrete components production based on LCA

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Binjie Tang , Huanyu Wu , Yu-Fei Wu
{"title":"Evaluation of the carbon reduction benefits of adopting the compression cast technology in concrete components production based on LCA","authors":"Binjie Tang ,&nbsp;Huanyu Wu ,&nbsp;Yu-Fei Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cement is responsible for the high carbon emissions reputation of the concrete industry. To cope with this issue, compression cast technology (CCT) is introduced as a potential low carbon production method for concrete components, as it could reduce the cement consumption and improve the mechanical performance. To evaluate the carbon reduction benefits of adopting the CCT in concrete components production, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method is employed and carbon emissions per unit of compressive strength (CECS, kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/MPa) is selected as the main indicator. The results indicate that the CECS of concrete with CCT decreased by 21 %-45 % compared to conventional concrete. Considering the carbon reduction benefits of avoiding waste disposal, the CECS of concrete with CCT decreased by 7 %-43 % compared to green concrete using conventional cast technology with similar strengths. If adding waste rubber in concrete with CCT, its CECS could be decreased by 28 %-93 % compared to conventional concrete. If promoting the CCT in the concrete industry, the annual carbon emissions of the global concrete industry can be reduced by 7 %, 14 %, 20 %, and 27 % with replacement ratios 25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 100 % from 2015 to 2060. The study indicates that implementing the CCT during concrete components production can significantly reduce carbon emissions of the concrete industry and the study provides guidance for carbon reduction efforts in the concrete industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107733"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924003276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cement is responsible for the high carbon emissions reputation of the concrete industry. To cope with this issue, compression cast technology (CCT) is introduced as a potential low carbon production method for concrete components, as it could reduce the cement consumption and improve the mechanical performance. To evaluate the carbon reduction benefits of adopting the CCT in concrete components production, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method is employed and carbon emissions per unit of compressive strength (CECS, kgCO2eq/MPa) is selected as the main indicator. The results indicate that the CECS of concrete with CCT decreased by 21 %-45 % compared to conventional concrete. Considering the carbon reduction benefits of avoiding waste disposal, the CECS of concrete with CCT decreased by 7 %-43 % compared to green concrete using conventional cast technology with similar strengths. If adding waste rubber in concrete with CCT, its CECS could be decreased by 28 %-93 % compared to conventional concrete. If promoting the CCT in the concrete industry, the annual carbon emissions of the global concrete industry can be reduced by 7 %, 14 %, 20 %, and 27 % with replacement ratios 25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 100 % from 2015 to 2060. The study indicates that implementing the CCT during concrete components production can significantly reduce carbon emissions of the concrete industry and the study provides guidance for carbon reduction efforts in the concrete industry.

Abstract Image

基于生命周期评估评估在混凝土构件生产中采用压铸技术的减碳效益
水泥是混凝土行业高碳排放的罪魁祸首。为解决这一问题,压铸技术(CCT)被作为一种潜在的混凝土构件低碳生产方法引入,因为它可以减少水泥用量并提高机械性能。为评估在混凝土构件生产中采用 CCT 的减碳效益,采用了生命周期评估(LCA)方法,并选择单位抗压强度的碳排放量(CECS,kgCO2eq/MPa)作为主要指标。结果表明,与传统混凝土相比,使用 CCT 的混凝土的 CECS 降低了 21%-45%。考虑到避免废弃物处理所带来的减碳效益,采用 CCT 的混凝土与采用传统浇注技术的绿色混凝土相比,在强度相似的情况下,CECS 降低了 7 %-43 %。如果在使用 CCT 的混凝土中添加废橡胶,其 CECS 可比传统混凝土降低 28 %-93 %。如果在混凝土行业推广 CCT,从 2015 年到 2060 年,全球混凝土行业每年的碳排放量可分别减少 7%、14%、20% 和 27%,替代率分别为 25%、50%、75% 和 100%。研究表明,在混凝土构件生产过程中实施 CCT 可以显著减少混凝土行业的碳排放,该研究为混凝土行业的碳减排工作提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信