Reflections on the first Global Stocktake of the Paris Agreement

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jianfeng Jeffrey Qi, Peter Dauvergne, Sirini Jeudy-Hugo, Jamal Srouji, Jen Iris Allan, Benjamin Georges-Picot, Tom Evans, Arthur Wyns, Anne Barre, Danica Marie Supnet, Enrique Maurtua Konstantinidis, Anne Hammill, Nathan Cogswell, Pratishtha Singh
{"title":"Reflections on the first Global Stocktake of the Paris Agreement","authors":"Jianfeng Jeffrey Qi,&nbsp;Peter Dauvergne,&nbsp;Sirini Jeudy-Hugo,&nbsp;Jamal Srouji,&nbsp;Jen Iris Allan,&nbsp;Benjamin Georges-Picot,&nbsp;Tom Evans,&nbsp;Arthur Wyns,&nbsp;Anne Barre,&nbsp;Danica Marie Supnet,&nbsp;Enrique Maurtua Konstantinidis,&nbsp;Anne Hammill,&nbsp;Nathan Cogswell,&nbsp;Pratishtha Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2024.100212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This commentary reflects on the first Global Stocktake (GST) under the Paris Agreement on climate change to offer insights for advancing climate actions and informing future GST cycles. The first GST, which concluded at COP28 in 2023, demonstrates the vital importance of a comprehensive, balanced, and inclusive approach to multilateral climate action. The GST's call to transition away from fossil fuels is an important political achievement. Yet, the GST outcome also reveals gaps, shortcomings, and potential dangers ahead. Future climate negotiations, we argue, would benefit from a more integrated, holistic perspective, and more nuanced balancing of ambition and implementation. More needs to be done to protect human rights, increase loss and damage funding, go beyond technological solutions, and address gender-differentiated consequences of climate change. Moreover, a great deal of work, including by nonstate actors, will be required to ensure the first GST translates into real action on the ground.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100212"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000120/pdfft?md5=f441aa748a796518cfab1e56f2d84407&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811624000120-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary reflects on the first Global Stocktake (GST) under the Paris Agreement on climate change to offer insights for advancing climate actions and informing future GST cycles. The first GST, which concluded at COP28 in 2023, demonstrates the vital importance of a comprehensive, balanced, and inclusive approach to multilateral climate action. The GST's call to transition away from fossil fuels is an important political achievement. Yet, the GST outcome also reveals gaps, shortcomings, and potential dangers ahead. Future climate negotiations, we argue, would benefit from a more integrated, holistic perspective, and more nuanced balancing of ambition and implementation. More needs to be done to protect human rights, increase loss and damage funding, go beyond technological solutions, and address gender-differentiated consequences of climate change. Moreover, a great deal of work, including by nonstate actors, will be required to ensure the first GST translates into real action on the ground.

对《巴黎协定》首次全球评估的思考
本评论对气候变化《巴黎协定》下的第一次全球评估(GST)进行了反思,为推进气候行动和未来的全球评估周期提供启示。第一次全球评估于 2023 年在缔约方大会第二十八届会议(COP28)上结束,表明了以全面、平衡、包容的方式开展多边气候行动的极端重要性。全球技术服务小组呼吁向不使用化石燃料过渡,这是一项重要的政治成就。然而,全球技术服务小组的成果也揭示了未来的差距、不足和潜在危险。我们认为,未来的气候谈判将受益于更加综合、全面的视角,以及在雄心和实施之间更加细致的平衡。在保护人权、增加损失和损害资金、超越技术解决方案以及应对气候变化的性别差异后果方面,还有更多工作要做。此外,还需要开展大量工作,包括非国家行为者的工作,以确保首届全球科技峰会转化为实际行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信