María Lanza-Postigo RN , Rebeca Abajas-Bustillo PhD, RN , Roberto Martin-Melón , Noelia Ruiz-Pellón RN , Carmen Ortego-Maté PhD, RN
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Simulation in the Acquisition of Socioemotional Skills Related to Health Care: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews","authors":"María Lanza-Postigo RN , Rebeca Abajas-Bustillo PhD, RN , Roberto Martin-Melón , Noelia Ruiz-Pellón RN , Carmen Ortego-Maté PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The objective of this SR of SR is to answer the question: Is simulation effective for the acquisition of socio-emotional skills related to health care?</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Simulation has become a relevant methodology for the training of socioemotional skills; however, the effectiveness of this methodology is difficult to interpret due to the diversity of results obtained to date.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Searches were conducted in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published from 2011 to 2022. The searches were completed between December 2021 and January 2022. Study quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022339156).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1285 studies were examined, of which seven systematic reviews were selected, yielding 88 studies with 8658 participants. The most commonly used methodologies were standardized patient (28.4%) and high-fidelity simulation (26.1%). The training consisted of an average of 3.6 sessions, with a mean duration of 153.8 minutes. The most trained socioemotional skills were communication (34.4%), self-efficacy (30.5%), and self-confidence (13.3%). Most studies (78.4%) reported statistically significant results favorable to the intervention group in all skills trained.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Simulation is an effective methodology for training a wide range of social and emotional competencies in students and health science professionals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000392/pdfft?md5=fa3a4331b92be0a1a041fb03b242534a&pid=1-s2.0-S1876139924000392-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
The objective of this SR of SR is to answer the question: Is simulation effective for the acquisition of socio-emotional skills related to health care?
Background
Simulation has become a relevant methodology for the training of socioemotional skills; however, the effectiveness of this methodology is difficult to interpret due to the diversity of results obtained to date.
Methods
Searches were conducted in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published from 2011 to 2022. The searches were completed between December 2021 and January 2022. Study quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022339156).
Results
A total of 1285 studies were examined, of which seven systematic reviews were selected, yielding 88 studies with 8658 participants. The most commonly used methodologies were standardized patient (28.4%) and high-fidelity simulation (26.1%). The training consisted of an average of 3.6 sessions, with a mean duration of 153.8 minutes. The most trained socioemotional skills were communication (34.4%), self-efficacy (30.5%), and self-confidence (13.3%). Most studies (78.4%) reported statistically significant results favorable to the intervention group in all skills trained.
Conclusion
Simulation is an effective methodology for training a wide range of social and emotional competencies in students and health science professionals.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation.
We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria:
Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation
Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation
Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation
Leadership for simulation
Simulation operations
Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
