Screening for carcinoid heart disease: Trends and future Perspectives

IF 1.9 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Bryan Mouser , James R. Howe , Olivia Atari , Joseph S. Dillon , Chandrikha Chandrasekharan , Kalpaj R. Parekh , Mohammad A. Bashir
{"title":"Screening for carcinoid heart disease: Trends and future Perspectives","authors":"Bryan Mouser ,&nbsp;James R. Howe ,&nbsp;Olivia Atari ,&nbsp;Joseph S. Dillon ,&nbsp;Chandrikha Chandrasekharan ,&nbsp;Kalpaj R. Parekh ,&nbsp;Mohammad A. Bashir","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Screening for carcinoid heart disease (CHD), has historically lacked consensus expert guidelines. In 2017, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) released expert recommendations for CHD screening among NET patients to improve CHD detection. The objective of this study is to evaluate CHD screening trends and utility of screening guidelines over more than two decades at a single tertiary care center.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Patients with NETs referred for abdominal surgical evaluation at a single tertiary care center were included, 300 patients from 1999 to 2018 and 34 patients from 2021 to 2022. Lab values for the following NANETS-proposed criteria at any point during their treatments were recorded: NETs with liver metastasis, blood serotonin &gt;5 times upper limit of normal (&gt;1000 ng/mL), NT-ProBNP &gt;260 pg/mL and clinical features suggestive of CHD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>85 % (285/334) of patients included in this study met one or more expert-recommended CHD screening criteria. However, 40 % (132/285) of patients meeting one or more criteria received CHD screening via echocardiogram at some point following NET diagnosis. While rates of screening for patients increased from the first decade to the second decade (32 % vs 40.6 %), the rates were much higher after guideline publication (70 %, 24/34). Furthermore, patients meeting multiple screening criteria were more likely to have evidence of structural valve disease.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results of this study suggest that utilization of these four expert-recommended screening criteria have greatly increased rates of CHD screening via echocardiogram and could assist in improving early CHD detection, especially for patients meeting multiple criteria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 200293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000588/pdfft?md5=7140b5fc3926a586566315e96ee509a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2772487524000588-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Screening for carcinoid heart disease (CHD), has historically lacked consensus expert guidelines. In 2017, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) released expert recommendations for CHD screening among NET patients to improve CHD detection. The objective of this study is to evaluate CHD screening trends and utility of screening guidelines over more than two decades at a single tertiary care center.

Materials and methods

Patients with NETs referred for abdominal surgical evaluation at a single tertiary care center were included, 300 patients from 1999 to 2018 and 34 patients from 2021 to 2022. Lab values for the following NANETS-proposed criteria at any point during their treatments were recorded: NETs with liver metastasis, blood serotonin >5 times upper limit of normal (>1000 ng/mL), NT-ProBNP >260 pg/mL and clinical features suggestive of CHD.

Results

85 % (285/334) of patients included in this study met one or more expert-recommended CHD screening criteria. However, 40 % (132/285) of patients meeting one or more criteria received CHD screening via echocardiogram at some point following NET diagnosis. While rates of screening for patients increased from the first decade to the second decade (32 % vs 40.6 %), the rates were much higher after guideline publication (70 %, 24/34). Furthermore, patients meeting multiple screening criteria were more likely to have evidence of structural valve disease.

Conclusions

Results of this study suggest that utilization of these four expert-recommended screening criteria have greatly increased rates of CHD screening via echocardiogram and could assist in improving early CHD detection, especially for patients meeting multiple criteria.

类癌性心脏病筛查:趋势与未来展望
背景类癌性心脏病(CHD)筛查历来缺乏专家共识指南。2017年,北美神经内分泌肿瘤学会(NANETS)发布了对NET患者进行CHD筛查的专家建议,以提高CHD的检出率。本研究的目的是评估一家三级医疗中心二十多年来的CHD筛查趋势和筛查指南的实用性。材料和方法纳入了一家三级医疗中心转诊进行腹部手术评估的NET患者,其中1999年至2018年有300例患者,2021年至2022年有34例患者。记录了治疗期间任何时间点的以下NANETS提出的标准的实验室值:NET伴肝转移、血清素>正常值上限的5倍(>1000 ng/mL)、NT-ProBNP>260 pg/mL以及提示CHD的临床特征。结果85%(285/334)纳入本研究的患者符合一项或多项专家建议的CHD筛查标准。然而,在符合一项或多项标准的患者中,有 40% (132/285)的患者在确诊为 NET 后的某个阶段接受了超声心动图检查。虽然患者的筛查率从第一个十年上升到第二个十年(32% vs 40.6%),但在指南发布后,筛查率要高得多(70%,24/34)。此外,符合多项筛查标准的患者更有可能有结构性瓣膜疾病的证据。结论这项研究的结果表明,采用专家推荐的这四项筛查标准大大提高了通过超声心动图进行心脏病筛查的比例,有助于改善早期心脏病的检测,尤其是符合多项标准的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信