The impact of sink removal and other water-free interventions in intensive care units on water-borne healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
J.M. Low , M. Chan , J.L. Low , M.C.W. Chua , J.H. Lee
{"title":"The impact of sink removal and other water-free interventions in intensive care units on water-borne healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review","authors":"J.M. Low ,&nbsp;M. Chan ,&nbsp;J.L. Low ,&nbsp;M.C.W. Chua ,&nbsp;J.H. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With increasing awareness of water sinks as potential sources of outbreaks and transmission of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in intensive care units (ICUs), there is growing interest in water-free patient care systems. This systematic review reviewed and synthesized available evidence on the effectiveness of sink removal with or without water-free activities in the ICU environment to reduce water-borne healthcare-associated infections. We searched five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase) for studies published from 1<sup>st</sup> January 1980 to 2<sup>nd</sup> April 2024 that examined water-less or water-free activities in the ICU to reduce healthcare-associated infections and patient colonization. Of 2075 articles, seven quasi-experimental studies (total: 332 patient beds) met the study selection criteria. Six of these seven studies (85.7%) were based in adult ICUs; one (14%) was in a neonatal ICU. Five of seven sites (71.4%) implemented water-less interventions after an outbreak. Water-free alternatives used included water-less bath products (six of seven; 85.7%), bottled water for consumption (three of seven; 42.9%), oral care (three of seven; 42.9%) and dissolving of oral medication (four of seven; 57.1%), designated ‘contaminated’ sink outside of patient and medication preparation areas for disposal of wastewater (four of seven; 57.1%). Implicated pathogens studied included MDR Gram-negative bacteria (four of seven; 57.1%), MDR <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> only (two of seven; 28.6%), and pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTB) (one of seven; 14.3%). Five of seven (71.4%) studies reported outbreak cessation. Preliminary evidence, from a limited number of studies of which the majority were conducted in an outbreak setting, suggest that sink removal and other water-free interventions in the ICU helped terminate outbreaks involving taps and decrease hospital-onset respiratory isolation of pulmonary NTB.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019567012400197X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With increasing awareness of water sinks as potential sources of outbreaks and transmission of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in intensive care units (ICUs), there is growing interest in water-free patient care systems. This systematic review reviewed and synthesized available evidence on the effectiveness of sink removal with or without water-free activities in the ICU environment to reduce water-borne healthcare-associated infections. We searched five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase) for studies published from 1st January 1980 to 2nd April 2024 that examined water-less or water-free activities in the ICU to reduce healthcare-associated infections and patient colonization. Of 2075 articles, seven quasi-experimental studies (total: 332 patient beds) met the study selection criteria. Six of these seven studies (85.7%) were based in adult ICUs; one (14%) was in a neonatal ICU. Five of seven sites (71.4%) implemented water-less interventions after an outbreak. Water-free alternatives used included water-less bath products (six of seven; 85.7%), bottled water for consumption (three of seven; 42.9%), oral care (three of seven; 42.9%) and dissolving of oral medication (four of seven; 57.1%), designated ‘contaminated’ sink outside of patient and medication preparation areas for disposal of wastewater (four of seven; 57.1%). Implicated pathogens studied included MDR Gram-negative bacteria (four of seven; 57.1%), MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa only (two of seven; 28.6%), and pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTB) (one of seven; 14.3%). Five of seven (71.4%) studies reported outbreak cessation. Preliminary evidence, from a limited number of studies of which the majority were conducted in an outbreak setting, suggest that sink removal and other water-free interventions in the ICU helped terminate outbreaks involving taps and decrease hospital-onset respiratory isolation of pulmonary NTB.

重症监护病房水槽移除及其他无水干预措施对水媒医疗相关感染的影响:系统综述。
背景:随着人们越来越意识到水槽是重症监护病房(ICU)中多重耐药菌(MDR)爆发和传播的潜在来源,人们对无水病人护理系统的兴趣与日俱增。本系统性综述回顾并综合了 ICU 环境中水槽移除和无水活动对减少水媒医疗相关感染的有效性的现有证据:我们在五个数据库(PubMed、MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Embase)中检索了 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 4 月 2 日期间发表的研究,这些研究探讨了 ICU 中的无水或无水活动对减少医源性感染和患者定植的作用:在 2075 篇文章中,有 7 项准实验研究(共 332 张病床)符合研究筛选标准。6/7项研究(85.7%)位于成人重症监护病房;1项研究(14%)位于新生儿重症监护病房。5/7 个研究地点(71.4%)在疫情爆发后实施了无水干预措施。使用的无水替代品包括无水沐浴产品(6/7;85.7%)、瓶装水饮用(3/7;42.9%)、口腔护理(3/7;42.9%)和口服药物溶解(4/7;57.1%)、在患者和药物准备区外指定 "污染 "水槽以处理废水(4/7;57.1%)。研究涉及的病原体包括耐药革兰氏阴性菌(4/7;57.1%)、耐药铜绿假单胞菌(2/7;28.6%)和肺部非结核分枝杆菌(NTB)(1/7;14.3%)。5/7(71.4%)项研究报告了疫情停止:有限的几项研究(其中大部分是在疫情爆发的环境中进行的)提供的初步证据表明,在重症监护病房中拆除水槽和采取其他无水干预措施有助于终止涉及水龙头的疫情爆发,并减少肺非结核分枝杆菌的院内呼吸道隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信