Impact of aging on maximal oxygen uptake in female runners and sedentary controls

IF 3.9
Vinícius Ribeiro dos Anjos Souza , Lavínia Vivan , Aldo Seffrin , Lucca Vallini , Fabio de Paula Domingos , Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira , Rodrigo Luiz Vancini , Katja Weiss , Thomas Rosemann , Beat Knechtle , Marilia Santos Andrade
{"title":"Impact of aging on maximal oxygen uptake in female runners and sedentary controls","authors":"Vinícius Ribeiro dos Anjos Souza ,&nbsp;Lavínia Vivan ,&nbsp;Aldo Seffrin ,&nbsp;Lucca Vallini ,&nbsp;Fabio de Paula Domingos ,&nbsp;Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Luiz Vancini ,&nbsp;Katja Weiss ,&nbsp;Thomas Rosemann ,&nbsp;Beat Knechtle ,&nbsp;Marilia Santos Andrade","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2024.112476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study aimed to compare V̇O<sub>2</sub>max (absolute, adjusted to total body mass, and adjusted to lean mass) in recreational runners and sedentary women &lt; and &gt; 50 yr and verify the effect of aging and physical activity level on the three types of V̇O<sub>2</sub> max expression. The study included 147 women:85 runners (45.7 ± 14.1 yr) and 62 sedentary controls (48.8 ± 9.8 yr). They were subjected to cardiopulmonary exercise testing for V̇O<sub>2</sub> max measurement and a body composition test by dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry system. V̇O<sub>2</sub>max were expressed as absolute values (L/min), relative to total body mass values (mL/kg/min), and relative to lean mass values (mL/kgLM/min). The two-way analysis of variance revealed a significant interaction [<em>F</em>(2,131) = 4.43, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001] and effects of age group [<em>F</em>(2,131) = 32.79, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001] and physical activity group [<em>F</em>(2,131) = 55.64, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001] on V̇O<sub>2</sub>max (mL/min). V̇O<sub>2</sub>max (mL/kg/min) and V̇O<sub>2</sub> max (mL/kgLM/min) were significantly influenced by age and physical activity levels. The multiple regression model explains 76.2 % of the dependent variable V̇O<sub>2</sub>max (mL/kg/min), age (<em>β</em> = −0.335, <em>t</em> = −7.841, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and physical activity group (<em>β</em> = −0.784, <em>t</em> = −18.351, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, female runners had higher V̇O<sub>2</sub> max values than sedentary women at all ages, even though aging has a greater impact on V̇O<sub>2</sub> max in the runners group. In addition to cardiorespiratory fitness, women's metabolic lean mass function, as measured by V̇O<sub>2</sub>max adjusted by lean mass, is significantly influenced by aging. Finally, physical activity has a greater impact on V̇O<sub>2</sub> max levels than aging.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556524001189/pdfft?md5=b658347ab0e23d916103ae80dda7c477&pid=1-s2.0-S0531556524001189-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556524001189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare V̇O2max (absolute, adjusted to total body mass, and adjusted to lean mass) in recreational runners and sedentary women < and > 50 yr and verify the effect of aging and physical activity level on the three types of V̇O2 max expression. The study included 147 women:85 runners (45.7 ± 14.1 yr) and 62 sedentary controls (48.8 ± 9.8 yr). They were subjected to cardiopulmonary exercise testing for V̇O2 max measurement and a body composition test by dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry system. V̇O2max were expressed as absolute values (L/min), relative to total body mass values (mL/kg/min), and relative to lean mass values (mL/kgLM/min). The two-way analysis of variance revealed a significant interaction [F(2,131) = 4.43, p < 0.001] and effects of age group [F(2,131) = 32.79, p < 0.001] and physical activity group [F(2,131) = 55.64, p < 0.001] on V̇O2max (mL/min). V̇O2max (mL/kg/min) and V̇O2 max (mL/kgLM/min) were significantly influenced by age and physical activity levels. The multiple regression model explains 76.2 % of the dependent variable V̇O2max (mL/kg/min), age (β = −0.335, t = −7.841, p < 0.001), and physical activity group (β = −0.784, t = −18.351, p < 0.001). In conclusion, female runners had higher V̇O2 max values than sedentary women at all ages, even though aging has a greater impact on V̇O2 max in the runners group. In addition to cardiorespiratory fitness, women's metabolic lean mass function, as measured by V̇O2max adjusted by lean mass, is significantly influenced by aging. Finally, physical activity has a greater impact on V̇O2 max levels than aging.

衰老对女性跑步者和久坐对照组最大摄氧量的影响。
本研究旨在比较年龄小于和大于50岁的休闲跑步者和久坐妇女的最大血气容积(绝对值、根据总体重调整值和根据瘦体重调整值),并验证年龄和体力活动水平对三种最大血气容积表达的影响。该研究包括 147 名女性:85 名跑步者(45.7 ± 14.1 岁)和 62 名久坐不动的对照组女性(48.8 ± 9.8 岁)。她们接受了心肺运动测试,以测量最大容氧量,并通过双发射X射线吸收测量系统进行了身体成分测试。最大血气容积以绝对值(升/分钟)、相对于总体重值(毫升/千克/分钟)和相对于瘦体重值(毫升/千克升/分钟)表示。双向方差分析显示存在显著的交互作用[F(2,131) = 4.43, p 2max (mL/min)。最大血氧活量(毫升/千克/分钟)和最大血氧活量(毫升/千克升/分钟)受年龄和体力活动水平的显著影响。多元回归模型解释了因变量 V̇O2max(mL/kg/min)的 76.2%,年龄(β = -0.335,t = -7.841,p 2 最大值)比所有年龄段的久坐妇女都大,即使年龄对跑步组 V̇O2 max 的影响更大。除了心肺功能外,女性的代谢瘦体重功能也受到老龄化的显著影响,其衡量标准是按瘦体重调整后的最大排氧量。最后,体力活动对最大排氧量的影响要大于衰老。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信