Retention rates of different Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: experience from a large monocentric cohort.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1080/03009742.2024.2353433
N Farina, A Tomelleri, N Boffini, A Cariddi, S Calvisi, N Viapiana, E Baldissera, M Matucci-Cerinic, L Dagna
{"title":"Retention rates of different Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: experience from a large monocentric cohort.","authors":"N Farina, A Tomelleri, N Boffini, A Cariddi, S Calvisi, N Viapiana, E Baldissera, M Matucci-Cerinic, L Dagna","doi":"10.1080/03009742.2024.2353433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been clearly shown. However, information on comparative drug retention rates (DRRs) of different JAKi is heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compute and compare DRRs of different JAKi in a large cohort of RA patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with RA treated with at least one JAKi and followed up at our centre were retrospectively identified. DRRs of each JAKi were computed at 24 months. The association of baseline features with drug persistence was tested. Variations in 28-joint Disease Activity Score-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores between baseline and 12 months were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 365 patients, with a total of 463 therapy courses. Tofacitinib was the most prescribed JAKi (33%), followed by baricitinib (25%), upadacitinib (24%), and filgotinib (21%). The mean treatment duration was 24 ± 17 months, with a maximum of 70 months. At 24 months, the overall DRR was 86%. DRRs were not significantly different across different JAKi. The only baseline predictor of treatment discontinuation was previous treatment with a biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.53; p = 0.021). There were significant reductions in DAS28-CRP and CDAI 1 year after treatment start.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our large, monocentric cohort, the overall 24 month DRR for JAKi was greater than 80%. No significant differences in retention were found among different JAKi. Persistence was lower in patients who had previously been treated with other bDMARDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21424,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"428-432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2024.2353433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been clearly shown. However, information on comparative drug retention rates (DRRs) of different JAKi is heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compute and compare DRRs of different JAKi in a large cohort of RA patients.

Method: Patients with RA treated with at least one JAKi and followed up at our centre were retrospectively identified. DRRs of each JAKi were computed at 24 months. The association of baseline features with drug persistence was tested. Variations in 28-joint Disease Activity Score-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores between baseline and 12 months were analysed.

Results: The study included 365 patients, with a total of 463 therapy courses. Tofacitinib was the most prescribed JAKi (33%), followed by baricitinib (25%), upadacitinib (24%), and filgotinib (21%). The mean treatment duration was 24 ± 17 months, with a maximum of 70 months. At 24 months, the overall DRR was 86%. DRRs were not significantly different across different JAKi. The only baseline predictor of treatment discontinuation was previous treatment with a biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.53; p = 0.021). There were significant reductions in DAS28-CRP and CDAI 1 year after treatment start.

Conclusions: In our large, monocentric cohort, the overall 24 month DRR for JAKi was greater than 80%. No significant differences in retention were found among different JAKi. Persistence was lower in patients who had previously been treated with other bDMARDs.

不同 Janus 激酶抑制剂在类风湿性关节炎中的保留率:来自大型单中心队列的经验。
目的:Janus 激酶抑制剂(JAKi)对类风湿性关节炎(RA)的疗效已得到明确证实。然而,有关不同 JAKi 药物保留率(DRR)比较的信息却不尽相同。本研究的目的是计算和比较大量 RA 患者中不同 JAKi 的药物保留率:方法:对接受过至少一种JAKi治疗并在本中心接受随访的RA患者进行回顾性鉴定。在24个月时计算每种JAKi的DRR。测试了基线特征与药物持续性的关联。分析了基线和12个月之间28关节疾病活动度评分-反应蛋白(DAS28-CRP)和临床疾病活动度指数(CDAI)评分的变化:研究共纳入了365名患者,共计463个疗程。托法替尼是处方最多的JAKi(33%),其次是巴利替尼(25%)、乌达替尼(24%)和非格替尼(21%)。平均治疗时间为 24 ± 17 个月,最长为 70 个月。24 个月时,总体 DRR 为 86%。不同 JAKi 的 DRR 无明显差异。唯一预测治疗中断的基线因素是既往接受过生物改良抗风湿药(bDMARD)治疗(危险比 1.65,95% 置信区间 1.08-2.53;P = 0.021)。治疗开始1年后,DAS28-CRP和CDAI明显下降:在我们的大型单中心队列中,JAKi治疗24个月的总体DRR超过了80%。不同JAKi的持续率没有明显差异。曾接受过其他bDMARDs治疗的患者的持续率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is the official journal of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology, a non-profit organization following the statutes of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology/Scandinavian Research Foundation. The main objective of the Foundation is to support research and promote information and knowledge about rheumatology and related fields. The annual surplus by running the Journal is awarded to young, talented, researchers within the field of rheumatology.pasting The Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is an international scientific journal covering clinical and experimental aspects of rheumatic diseases. The journal provides essential reading for rheumatologists as well as general practitioners, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, pharmacologists, pathologists and other health professionals with an interest in patients with rheumatic diseases. The journal publishes original articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters and supplements within the various fields of clinical and experimental rheumatology, including; Epidemiology Aetiology and pathogenesis Treatment and prophylaxis Laboratory aspects including genetics, biochemistry, immunology, immunopathology, microbiology, histopathology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Radiological aspects including X-ray, ultrasonography, CT, MRI and other forms of imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信