Automated Radiology Report Generation: A Review of Recent Advances.

IF 17.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Phillip Sloan, Philip Clatworthy, Edwin Simpson, Majid Mirmehdi
{"title":"Automated Radiology Report Generation: A Review of Recent Advances.","authors":"Phillip Sloan, Philip Clatworthy, Edwin Simpson, Majid Mirmehdi","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2024.3408456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing demands on medical imaging departments are taking a toll on the radiologist's ability to deliver timely and accurate reports. Recent technological advances in artificial intelligence have demonstrated great potential for automatic radiology report generation (ARRG), sparking an explosion of research. This survey paper conducts a methodological review of contemporary ARRG approaches by way of (i) assessing datasets based on characteristics, such as availability, size, and adoption rate, (ii) examining deep learning training methods, such as contrastive learning and reinforcement learning, (iii) exploring state-of-the-art model architectures, including variations of CNN and transformer models, (iv) outlining techniques integrating clinical knowledge through multimodal inputs and knowledge graphs, and (v) scrutinising current model evaluation techniques, including commonly applied NLP metrics and qualitative clinical reviews. Furthermore, the quantitative results of the reviewed models are analysed, where the top performing models are examined to seek further insights. Finally, potential new directions are highlighted, with the adoption of additional datasets from other radiological modalities and improved evaluation methods predicted as important areas of future development.</p>","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2024.3408456","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing demands on medical imaging departments are taking a toll on the radiologist's ability to deliver timely and accurate reports. Recent technological advances in artificial intelligence have demonstrated great potential for automatic radiology report generation (ARRG), sparking an explosion of research. This survey paper conducts a methodological review of contemporary ARRG approaches by way of (i) assessing datasets based on characteristics, such as availability, size, and adoption rate, (ii) examining deep learning training methods, such as contrastive learning and reinforcement learning, (iii) exploring state-of-the-art model architectures, including variations of CNN and transformer models, (iv) outlining techniques integrating clinical knowledge through multimodal inputs and knowledge graphs, and (v) scrutinising current model evaluation techniques, including commonly applied NLP metrics and qualitative clinical reviews. Furthermore, the quantitative results of the reviewed models are analysed, where the top performing models are examined to seek further insights. Finally, potential new directions are highlighted, with the adoption of additional datasets from other radiological modalities and improved evaluation methods predicted as important areas of future development.

自动生成放射报告:最新进展回顾
对医学影像部门的要求越来越高,这对放射科医生及时准确地提供报告的能力造成了影响。人工智能技术的最新进展显示了自动生成放射报告(ARRG)的巨大潜力,从而引发了研究的爆炸式增长。本调查论文通过以下方式对当代 ARRG 方法进行了方法学回顾:(i) 根据可用性、规模和采用率等特征评估数据集;(ii) 研究深度学习训练方法,如对比学习和强化学习;(iii) 探索最先进的模型架构,包括 CNN 和变换器模型的变体;(iv) 概述通过多模态输入和知识图谱整合临床知识的技术;(v) 仔细研究当前的模型评估技术,包括常用的 NLP 指标和定性临床评论。此外,还分析了已审查模型的定量结果,并对表现最佳的模型进行了研究,以寻求进一步的见解。最后,强调了潜在的新方向,并预测采用其他放射模式的额外数据集和改进评估方法是未来发展的重要领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
31.70
自引率
0.60%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (RBME) serves as a platform to review the state-of-the-art and trends in the interdisciplinary field of biomedical engineering, which encompasses engineering, life sciences, and medicine. The journal aims to consolidate research and reviews for members of all IEEE societies interested in biomedical engineering. Recognizing the demand for comprehensive reviews among authors of various IEEE journals, RBME addresses this need by receiving, reviewing, and publishing scholarly works under one umbrella. It covers a broad spectrum, from historical to modern developments in biomedical engineering and the integration of technologies from various IEEE societies into the life sciences and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信