Principal Component Analysis of a Real-World Cohort of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Cases: Demonstration of a Powerful Data-Mining Technique for Identifying Areas of Research.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Cornea Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000003584
Jean-Marc Perone, Christophe Goetz, Yinka Zevering, Alexis Derumigny
{"title":"Principal Component Analysis of a Real-World Cohort of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Cases: Demonstration of a Powerful Data-Mining Technique for Identifying Areas of Research.","authors":"Jean-Marc Perone, Christophe Goetz, Yinka Zevering, Alexis Derumigny","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Principal component analysis (PCA) is a descriptive exploratory statistical technique that is widely used in complex fields for data mining. However, it is rarely used in ophthalmology. We explored its research potential with a large series of eyes that underwent 3 keratoplasty techniques: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), conventional Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (ConDSAEK), or ultrathin-DSAEK (UT-DSAEK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive DMEK/DSAEK cases conducted in 2016 to 2022 that had ≥24 months of follow-up were included. ConDSAEK and UT-DSAEK were defined as preoperative central graft thickness ≥130 and <130 μm, respectively. Seventy-six patient, disease, surgical practice, and temporal outcome variables were subjected to PCA, including preoperative anterior keratometry, the use of sulfur hexafluoride gas (SF6) versus air for primary tamponade, and postoperative best corrected visual acuity and endothelial cell density. Associations of interest that were revealed by PCA were assessed with the Welch t test or Pearson test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 331 eyes were treated with DMEK (n = 165), ConDSAEK (n = 95), or UT-DSAEK (n = 71). PCA showed that ConDSAEK and UT-DSAEK clustered closely, including regarding postoperative best corrected visual acuity, and were clearly distinct from DMEK. PCA and follow-up univariate analyses suggested that in DMEK, 1) flatter preoperative anterior keratometry (average, K1, and K2) associated with more rebubbling ( P = 0.004-0.089) and graft detachment ( P = 0.007-0.022); 2) graft marking did not affect postoperative endothelial cell density; and 3) lower postoperative endothelial cell density associated with SF6 use (all P > 0.001) and longer surgery ( P = 0.005-0.091). All associations are currently under additional investigation in our hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCA is a powerful technique that can rapidly reveal clinically relevant associations in complex ophthalmological datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":"209-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Principal component analysis (PCA) is a descriptive exploratory statistical technique that is widely used in complex fields for data mining. However, it is rarely used in ophthalmology. We explored its research potential with a large series of eyes that underwent 3 keratoplasty techniques: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), conventional Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (ConDSAEK), or ultrathin-DSAEK (UT-DSAEK).

Methods: All consecutive DMEK/DSAEK cases conducted in 2016 to 2022 that had ≥24 months of follow-up were included. ConDSAEK and UT-DSAEK were defined as preoperative central graft thickness ≥130 and <130 μm, respectively. Seventy-six patient, disease, surgical practice, and temporal outcome variables were subjected to PCA, including preoperative anterior keratometry, the use of sulfur hexafluoride gas (SF6) versus air for primary tamponade, and postoperative best corrected visual acuity and endothelial cell density. Associations of interest that were revealed by PCA were assessed with the Welch t test or Pearson test.

Results: A total of 331 eyes were treated with DMEK (n = 165), ConDSAEK (n = 95), or UT-DSAEK (n = 71). PCA showed that ConDSAEK and UT-DSAEK clustered closely, including regarding postoperative best corrected visual acuity, and were clearly distinct from DMEK. PCA and follow-up univariate analyses suggested that in DMEK, 1) flatter preoperative anterior keratometry (average, K1, and K2) associated with more rebubbling ( P = 0.004-0.089) and graft detachment ( P = 0.007-0.022); 2) graft marking did not affect postoperative endothelial cell density; and 3) lower postoperative endothelial cell density associated with SF6 use (all P > 0.001) and longer surgery ( P = 0.005-0.091). All associations are currently under additional investigation in our hospital.

Conclusions: PCA is a powerful technique that can rapidly reveal clinically relevant associations in complex ophthalmological datasets.

对真实世界中的脱丝膜剥离自动内皮角膜移植术和脱丝膜内皮角膜移植术病例群进行主成分分析:展示强大的数据挖掘技术,确定研究领域。
目的:主成分分析(PCA)是一种描述性探索统计技术,广泛应用于复杂领域的数据挖掘。但在眼科领域却很少使用。我们通过大量接受过三种角膜移植技术的眼睛来探索其研究潜力:方法:纳入2016年至2022年进行的所有随访时间≥24个月的连续DMEK/DSAEK病例。ConDSAEK和UT-DSAEK的定义是术前中央移植物厚度≥130和结果:共有 331 只眼睛接受了 DMEK(n = 165)、ConDSAEK(n = 95)或 UT-DSAEK (n = 71)治疗。PCA 显示,ConDSAEK 和 UT-DSAEK 聚类紧密,包括术后最佳矫正视力,与 DMEK 有明显区别。PCA 和随访单变量分析表明,在 DMEK 中,1)术前较平坦的前角膜度数(平均值、K1 和 K2)与较多的反泡(P = 0.004-0.089)和移植物脱离(P = 0.007-0.022);2)移植物标记不影响术后 ECD;3)术后内皮细胞密度较低与使用 SF6(所有 P > 0.001)和手术时间较长(P = 0.005-0.091)有关。目前,我院正在对所有关联进行进一步调查:PCA是一种强大的技术,能在复杂的眼科数据集中快速揭示与临床相关的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信