[Nodal metastasis and value of neck dissection in T1/2 oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas].

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Eric Deuß, Cornelius H L Kürten, Moritz Meyer, Christoph Raphael Buhr, Julian Künzel, Benjamin Ernst, Stefan Mattheis, Stephan Lang, Timon Hussain
{"title":"[Nodal metastasis and value of neck dissection in T1/2 oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas].","authors":"Eric Deuß, Cornelius H L Kürten, Moritz Meyer, Christoph Raphael Buhr, Julian Künzel, Benjamin Ernst, Stefan Mattheis, Stephan Lang, Timon Hussain","doi":"10.1055/a-2291-9979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to heterogeneous data, the indication for elective neck dissection (END) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx and oropharynx (HPSCC and OPSCC) in stages T1/2N0 is somewhat unclear. Therefore, in this multicenter study, we performed detailed analysis of the metastatic behavior of HPSCC and OPSCC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The nodal metastatic patterns of 262 HPSCC and OPSCC patients who had undergone surgery was retrospectively investigated. In addition, recurrence-free and overall survival were recorded. Furthermore, a systematic literature review on the topic was completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with HPSCC, a discrepancy between clinical and pathologic N status was recorded in 62.1% of patients vs. 52.4% for p16- OPSCC, and 43.6% for p16+ OPSCC. The occult metastasis rate in cT1/2cN0 primary tumors was 38.9% for HPSCC vs. 17.8% (p16- OPSCC) and 11.1% (p16+ OPSCC). Contralateral metastases occurred in 22.2% of cases for HPSCC at stages cT1/2cN0, compared to only 9.1% for p16- OPSCC, and 0% for p16+ OPSCC patients.Patients with p16+ OPSCC had better recurrence-free and overall survival than p16- OPSCC and HPSCC patients. A direct association between patient survival and the extent of neck surgical therapy could not be demonstrated in our patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with HPSCC are at risk for bilateral neck metastases from stage cT1/2cN0, justifying bilateral END. Patients with T1/2 OPSCC present with occult metastases ipsilaterally in >20% of cases; however, the risk for contralateral occult metastasis is <10%. Hence, in strictly lateralized cT1/2CN0 tumors, omission of contralateral END may be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":17965,"journal":{"name":"Laryngo-rhino-otologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngo-rhino-otologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2291-9979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to heterogeneous data, the indication for elective neck dissection (END) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx and oropharynx (HPSCC and OPSCC) in stages T1/2N0 is somewhat unclear. Therefore, in this multicenter study, we performed detailed analysis of the metastatic behavior of HPSCC and OPSCC.

Material and methods: The nodal metastatic patterns of 262 HPSCC and OPSCC patients who had undergone surgery was retrospectively investigated. In addition, recurrence-free and overall survival were recorded. Furthermore, a systematic literature review on the topic was completed.

Results: In patients with HPSCC, a discrepancy between clinical and pathologic N status was recorded in 62.1% of patients vs. 52.4% for p16- OPSCC, and 43.6% for p16+ OPSCC. The occult metastasis rate in cT1/2cN0 primary tumors was 38.9% for HPSCC vs. 17.8% (p16- OPSCC) and 11.1% (p16+ OPSCC). Contralateral metastases occurred in 22.2% of cases for HPSCC at stages cT1/2cN0, compared to only 9.1% for p16- OPSCC, and 0% for p16+ OPSCC patients.Patients with p16+ OPSCC had better recurrence-free and overall survival than p16- OPSCC and HPSCC patients. A direct association between patient survival and the extent of neck surgical therapy could not be demonstrated in our patients.

Conclusion: Patients with HPSCC are at risk for bilateral neck metastases from stage cT1/2cN0, justifying bilateral END. Patients with T1/2 OPSCC present with occult metastases ipsilaterally in >20% of cases; however, the risk for contralateral occult metastasis is <10%. Hence, in strictly lateralized cT1/2CN0 tumors, omission of contralateral END may be considered.

[T1/2口咽癌和下咽癌的结节转移和颈部切除术的价值]。
背景:由于数据不一,下咽和口咽鳞状细胞癌(HPSCC和OPSCC)T1/2N0期患者选择性颈部切除术(END)的适应症尚不明确。因此,在这项多中心研究中,我们对 HPSCC 和 OPSCC 的转移行为进行了详细分析:材料和方法:我们对 262 例接受过手术的 HPSCC 和 OPSCC 患者的结节转移模式进行了回顾性调查。此外,还记录了无复发生存率和总生存率。此外,还完成了相关的系统性文献综述:结果:在HPSCC患者中,临床与病理N状态不一致的患者占62.1%,p16- OPSCC患者占52.4%,p16+ OPSCC患者占43.6%。在cT1/2cN0原发肿瘤中,HPSCC的隐匿转移率为38.9%,p16- OPSCC为17.8%,p16+ OPSCC为11.1%。在cT1/2cN0期的HPSCC病例中,22.2%发生了对侧转移,而p16- OPSCC患者仅为9.1%,p16+ OPSCC患者为0%。在我们的患者中,患者生存率与颈部手术治疗程度之间没有直接联系:结论:HPSCC患者有从cT1/2cN0期向双侧颈部转移的风险,因此有必要进行双侧END。T1/2期OPSCC患者出现同侧隐匿性转移的比例大于20%;然而,对侧隐匿性转移的风险是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laryngo-rhino-otologie
Laryngo-rhino-otologie 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
30.00%
发文量
1399
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie ist die deutschsprachige Fachzeitschrift für Ärzte in Klinik und Praxis mit Fokus auf die Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie. Die Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie bringt die Themen, die Sie wirklich interessieren und in der täglichen Arbeit unterstützen: Kurze, leicht lesbare Beiträge, interessante Rubriken und Originalarbeiten mit Relevanz für Ihre Arbeit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信