Enhancing onion growth and yield quality via soil amendments and foliar nutrition under deficit irrigation

IF 1.9 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE
Ayman ElGhamry, Dina Ghazi, Mohamed Elsherpiny, mohamed Kassem, Amira Kassem, amal helmy
{"title":"Enhancing onion growth and yield quality via soil amendments and foliar nutrition under deficit irrigation","authors":"Ayman ElGhamry, Dina Ghazi, Mohamed Elsherpiny, mohamed Kassem, Amira Kassem, amal helmy","doi":"10.21608/ejss.2023.230611.1644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EVELOPING a modern approach to sustain strategic crop productivity under conditions of water scarcity is a matter that occupies the thoughts of all researchers in the field of agricultural scientific research. So, a research trial was performed during the growing season of 2022/ 2023 for improving the onion growth performance and its quantitative and qualitative yield under deficit irrigation via some soil amendments and some beneficial element spraying. Three irrigation regimes [ I 1 : Four irrigations, I 2 : Three irrigations and I 3 : Two irrigations were evaluated as main plots. The soil amendments [ T 1 : Without soil amendments), T 2 : Biochar, T 3 : Zeolite, T 4 : Compost (plant residues), at rate of 10 Mg ha -1 for each soil amendment] were evaluated as sub main plots. Also, the foliar application of nutrient elements [ F 1 : Without foliar application, F 2 : Boron, F 3 : Copper, F 4 : Selenium, at rate of 10 mg L -1 for each element ) was assessed as sub-main plots. Parameters expressing the growth performance ( e.g., foliage dry weight, chlorophyll, proline and catalase enzyme) at the period of 75 days from transplanting were determined. Also, traits expressing quantitative yield ( e.g., total and marketable bulb yield) and qualitative yield ( e.g., carbohydrate, protein, vitamin C, total dissolved solids and pyruvic acid) were estimated. The findings indicate that the traditional irrigation approach (I 1 ) caused the best performance in terms of both quantitative and qualitative yield. Following this, the water deficit treatments ( I 2 and I 3 ) resulted in lower performance, as the I 3 treatment led to the lowest performance. When considering soil amendments, compost proved to be the most effective, followed by zeolite, then biochar, while, the control treatment ( without soil amendments) was the least effective. Regarding the beneficial elements, the order of effectiveness from most to least was Se > Cu > B > F 1 (control). Generally, the most favorable outcomes were observed when combining compost ( T 4 ) with selenium foliar application ( F 4 ), within the framework of the traditional irrigation treatment ( I 1 ). Notably, the growth performance, as well as the quantitative and qualitative yield, were better when employing the combined approach of compost (T 4 ) and selenium foliar application (F 4 ) under the water deficit treatment (I 2 ) compared to plants grown traditionally without any of the studied substances (I 1 x T 1 x F 1 ). In conclusion, this research underscores the potential of soil amendments, and nutrient application strategies to enhance onion growth and yield under water scarcity. By continuously refining these approaches and embracing a holistic perspective, the agricultural community can move closer to ensuring food security and sustainability in challenging environmental conditions.","PeriodicalId":44612,"journal":{"name":"EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejss.2023.230611.1644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

EVELOPING a modern approach to sustain strategic crop productivity under conditions of water scarcity is a matter that occupies the thoughts of all researchers in the field of agricultural scientific research. So, a research trial was performed during the growing season of 2022/ 2023 for improving the onion growth performance and its quantitative and qualitative yield under deficit irrigation via some soil amendments and some beneficial element spraying. Three irrigation regimes [ I 1 : Four irrigations, I 2 : Three irrigations and I 3 : Two irrigations were evaluated as main plots. The soil amendments [ T 1 : Without soil amendments), T 2 : Biochar, T 3 : Zeolite, T 4 : Compost (plant residues), at rate of 10 Mg ha -1 for each soil amendment] were evaluated as sub main plots. Also, the foliar application of nutrient elements [ F 1 : Without foliar application, F 2 : Boron, F 3 : Copper, F 4 : Selenium, at rate of 10 mg L -1 for each element ) was assessed as sub-main plots. Parameters expressing the growth performance ( e.g., foliage dry weight, chlorophyll, proline and catalase enzyme) at the period of 75 days from transplanting were determined. Also, traits expressing quantitative yield ( e.g., total and marketable bulb yield) and qualitative yield ( e.g., carbohydrate, protein, vitamin C, total dissolved solids and pyruvic acid) were estimated. The findings indicate that the traditional irrigation approach (I 1 ) caused the best performance in terms of both quantitative and qualitative yield. Following this, the water deficit treatments ( I 2 and I 3 ) resulted in lower performance, as the I 3 treatment led to the lowest performance. When considering soil amendments, compost proved to be the most effective, followed by zeolite, then biochar, while, the control treatment ( without soil amendments) was the least effective. Regarding the beneficial elements, the order of effectiveness from most to least was Se > Cu > B > F 1 (control). Generally, the most favorable outcomes were observed when combining compost ( T 4 ) with selenium foliar application ( F 4 ), within the framework of the traditional irrigation treatment ( I 1 ). Notably, the growth performance, as well as the quantitative and qualitative yield, were better when employing the combined approach of compost (T 4 ) and selenium foliar application (F 4 ) under the water deficit treatment (I 2 ) compared to plants grown traditionally without any of the studied substances (I 1 x T 1 x F 1 ). In conclusion, this research underscores the potential of soil amendments, and nutrient application strategies to enhance onion growth and yield under water scarcity. By continuously refining these approaches and embracing a holistic perspective, the agricultural community can move closer to ensuring food security and sustainability in challenging environmental conditions.
在缺水灌溉条件下,通过土壤改良和叶面营养提高洋葱的生长和产量质量
在缺水条件下开发一种现代方法来维持作物的战略生产力,是农业科学研究领域所有研究人员都在思考的问题。因此,在 2022/2023 年的生长季节进行了一项研究试验,通过一些土壤改良剂和喷洒一些有益元素来改善缺水灌溉条件下洋葱的生长性能及其数量和质量产量。三个灌溉制度[I 1:四次灌溉,I 2:三次灌溉,I 3:两次灌溉]作为主要地块进行了评估。土壤改良剂 [ T 1:无土壤改良剂)、T 2:生物炭、T 3:沸石、T 4:堆肥(植物残留物),每种土壤改良剂的用量为 10 兆克/公顷-1] 被作为次主田进行评估。此外,叶面喷施营养元素[F 1:无叶面喷施;F 2:硼;F 3:铜;F 4:硒,每种元素的喷施量为 10 毫克升/公顷]也作为子主田进行了评估。测定了移栽后 75 天的生长性能参数(如叶片干重、叶绿素、脯氨酸和过氧化氢酶)。此外,还估算了表示定量产量(如球茎总产量和可销售产量)和定性产量(如碳水化合物、蛋白质、维生素 C、总溶解固体和丙酮酸)的性状。结果表明,传统灌溉方法(I 1)在定量和定性产量方面表现最佳。随后,缺水处理(I 2 和 I 3)的产量较低,其中 I 3 的产量最低。在考虑土壤改良剂时,堆肥被证明是最有效的,其次是沸石,然后是生物炭,而对照处理(无土壤改良剂)的效果最差。在有益元素方面,效果从高到低的顺序是硒(Se)> 铜(Cu)> 硼(B)> F 1(对照组)。一般来说,在传统灌溉处理(I 1)的框架内,将堆肥(T 4)与硒叶面喷施(F 4)结合使用,可以观察到最有利的结果。值得注意的是,在缺水处理(I 2)下,采用堆肥(T 4)和叶面喷施硒(F 4)相结合的方法,其生长表现以及定量和定性产量均优于不添加任何研究物质的传统种植方法(I 1 x T 1 x F 1)。总之,这项研究强调了土壤改良剂和养分施用策略在缺水条件下提高洋葱生长和产量的潜力。通过不断完善这些方法并采用全面的视角,农业界可以在具有挑战性的环境条件下确保粮食安全和可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信