Success rate and complication prevalence of peripheral catheterization of the cephalic, lateral saphenous and marginal ear veins in pet rabbits

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Ophélie Cojean , Alexis Duhamelle , Sylvain Larrat
{"title":"Success rate and complication prevalence of peripheral catheterization of the cephalic, lateral saphenous and marginal ear veins in pet rabbits","authors":"Ophélie Cojean ,&nbsp;Alexis Duhamelle ,&nbsp;Sylvain Larrat","doi":"10.1053/j.jepm.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intravenous catheter placement is a routine procedure in exotic pet medicine, yet the selection of the optimal venous site for catheterization in rabbits (<em>Oryctolagus cuniculus</em>) remains controversial. Recommendations differ between countries and authors, and lack evidence-based data. This prospective study aimed to document and compare the prevalence and types of complications secondary to peripheral venous catheterization in domestic rabbits as related to the vein catheterized.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Catheterization events (n = 151) were randomly attributed to three groups, named according to the venous site selected: cephalic (n = 39), lateral saphenous (n = 58) and marginal ear vein (n = 54). Rabbits that needed a catheter for fluid therapy, surgery, or imaging, were included in the study. Catheters were placed by three veterinarians following a standardized method. Data regarding the patient, the type of catheter, and the treatment were recorded. Complications were evaluated every day after the catheter placement, at removal and after 15 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Minor complications that were observed included catheters which were bent at the elbow or removed by the rabbit, and twisted or chewed tubing. Ear necrosis and signs of phlebitis were considered major complications. Catheter placement failure was significantly higher in the “cephalic” group (odds ratio = 4, 95% Confidence Interval = [16.67,1.04], <em>P</em> = 0.048), without differences between the operators. For the marginal ear vein, there was also a significant association between the failure rate and the length of the rabbit's ear (Wilcoxon effect size = 0.42, 95% CI = [0.14,0.64], <em>P</em> = 0.003). No major complication was observed in any groups. Minor complications occurred without significant differences between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical relevance</h3><p>The results suggest that intravenous catheters in rabbits do not carry significant complications irrespective of the chosen site, but cephalic vein placement carries the highest risk of failure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15801,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557506324000703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intravenous catheter placement is a routine procedure in exotic pet medicine, yet the selection of the optimal venous site for catheterization in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) remains controversial. Recommendations differ between countries and authors, and lack evidence-based data. This prospective study aimed to document and compare the prevalence and types of complications secondary to peripheral venous catheterization in domestic rabbits as related to the vein catheterized.

Methods

Catheterization events (n = 151) were randomly attributed to three groups, named according to the venous site selected: cephalic (n = 39), lateral saphenous (n = 58) and marginal ear vein (n = 54). Rabbits that needed a catheter for fluid therapy, surgery, or imaging, were included in the study. Catheters were placed by three veterinarians following a standardized method. Data regarding the patient, the type of catheter, and the treatment were recorded. Complications were evaluated every day after the catheter placement, at removal and after 15 days.

Results

Minor complications that were observed included catheters which were bent at the elbow or removed by the rabbit, and twisted or chewed tubing. Ear necrosis and signs of phlebitis were considered major complications. Catheter placement failure was significantly higher in the “cephalic” group (odds ratio = 4, 95% Confidence Interval = [16.67,1.04], P = 0.048), without differences between the operators. For the marginal ear vein, there was also a significant association between the failure rate and the length of the rabbit's ear (Wilcoxon effect size = 0.42, 95% CI = [0.14,0.64], P = 0.003). No major complication was observed in any groups. Minor complications occurred without significant differences between the groups.

Conclusions and clinical relevance

The results suggest that intravenous catheters in rabbits do not carry significant complications irrespective of the chosen site, but cephalic vein placement carries the highest risk of failure.

宠物兔头静脉、侧隐静脉和耳缘静脉外周导管插入术的成功率和并发症发生率。
背景静脉导管置入是外来宠物医学中的一项常规程序,但如何选择兔子(Oryctolagus cuniculus)导管置入的最佳静脉部位仍存在争议。不同国家和作者的建议各不相同,而且缺乏循证数据。这项前瞻性研究旨在记录和比较家兔外周静脉导管插入术后并发症的发生率和类型,这些并发症与导管插入的静脉有关。方法将导管插入术事件(n = 151)随机分为三组,根据选择的静脉部位命名:头静脉(n = 39)、侧隐静脉(n = 58)和耳缘静脉(n = 54)。需要导管进行输液治疗、手术或成像的兔子都被纳入研究范围。导管由三名兽医按照标准化方法置入。有关患者、导管类型和治疗方法的数据均被记录在案。结果观察到的轻微并发症包括导管在肘部弯曲或被兔子拔出,导管扭曲或被啃咬。耳朵坏死和静脉炎症状被视为主要并发症。头静脉 "组导管置入失败率明显更高(几率比 = 4,95% 置信区间 = [16.67,1.04],P = 0.048),不同操作者之间没有差异。就耳缘静脉而言,失败率与兔子耳朵的长度也有显著关联(Wilcoxon效应大小=0.42,95% CI = [0.14,0.64],P = 0.003)。各组均未发现重大并发症。结论和临床意义研究结果表明,无论选择哪个部位,兔子静脉导管都不会产生明显的并发症,但头静脉置管失败的风险最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine
Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine provides clinicians with a convenient, comprehensive, "must have" resource to enhance and elevate their expertise with exotic pet medicine. Each issue contains wide ranging peer-reviewed articles that cover many of the current and novel topics important to clinicians caring for exotic pets. Diagnostic challenges, consensus articles and selected review articles are also included to help keep veterinarians up to date on issues affecting their practice. In addition, the Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine serves as the official publication of both the Association of Exotic Mammal Veterinarians (AEMV) and the European Association of Avian Veterinarians (EAAV). The Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine is the most complete resource for practitioners who treat exotic pets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信