Assessment of Different Weed Control Methods on Growth and Yield Performance of T. Aus Rice

Kawser  Hossen
{"title":"Assessment of Different Weed Control Methods on Growth and Yield Performance of T. Aus Rice","authors":"Kawser  Hossen","doi":"10.19080/artoaj.2020.24.556267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experiment was conducted in the Agriculture Field Laboratory, Noakhali Science and Technology University (NSTU) during the period of April-August 2019, for the assessment of different weed control methods on growth and yield performance of transplanting aus (early summer) rice. The experiment was carried out with four (4) weed control treatments viz. T1 = No weeding (control); T2 = Hand weeding at 15 and 30 DAT; T3 = Pre-emergence herbicide (Acetachlore 14% + Bensulfuron methyle 4%); T4 = Post-emergence herbicide (Pyrozosulfuran ethyle 10 %) using two aus varieties viz. BRRI dhan 83 and BRRI dhan 65. The experiment was carried out in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The result revealed pre-emergence herbicide (T3) as the most effective and efficient method of weed control by increasing yield significantly. No weeding caused 37.46 % loss of yield in this experiment where the application of pre-emergence herbicide showed 96.26 % higher yield than no weeding followed by hand weeding 79.14 % and post-emergence herbicide 64.70 %. Post-emergence herbicide performed well in tillers hill-1 along with straw yield. No weeding showed worst performance in every growth and yield attributes also it resembled as liable for maximum sterile grains panicle-1. Despite some offensive effects, no efficient alternative is currently available to shift the herbicidal weed control in aus rice as manual hand weeding is laborious and costly. Being efficient in controlling weeds, application of the pre-emergence herbicide may be used for effective weed control in aus rice.","PeriodicalId":360573,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal","volume":"46 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/artoaj.2020.24.556267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in the Agriculture Field Laboratory, Noakhali Science and Technology University (NSTU) during the period of April-August 2019, for the assessment of different weed control methods on growth and yield performance of transplanting aus (early summer) rice. The experiment was carried out with four (4) weed control treatments viz. T1 = No weeding (control); T2 = Hand weeding at 15 and 30 DAT; T3 = Pre-emergence herbicide (Acetachlore 14% + Bensulfuron methyle 4%); T4 = Post-emergence herbicide (Pyrozosulfuran ethyle 10 %) using two aus varieties viz. BRRI dhan 83 and BRRI dhan 65. The experiment was carried out in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The result revealed pre-emergence herbicide (T3) as the most effective and efficient method of weed control by increasing yield significantly. No weeding caused 37.46 % loss of yield in this experiment where the application of pre-emergence herbicide showed 96.26 % higher yield than no weeding followed by hand weeding 79.14 % and post-emergence herbicide 64.70 %. Post-emergence herbicide performed well in tillers hill-1 along with straw yield. No weeding showed worst performance in every growth and yield attributes also it resembled as liable for maximum sterile grains panicle-1. Despite some offensive effects, no efficient alternative is currently available to shift the herbicidal weed control in aus rice as manual hand weeding is laborious and costly. Being efficient in controlling weeds, application of the pre-emergence herbicide may be used for effective weed control in aus rice.
评估不同杂草控制方法对 T. Aus 水稻生长和产量的影响
2019 年 4 月至 8 月期间,在诺阿哈利科技大学(NSTU)农业田间实验室进行了一项实验,以评估不同杂草控制方法对插秧 aus(初夏)水稻生长和产量表现的影响。试验采用四(4)种杂草控制处理,即 T1 = 不除草(对照);T2 = 在 15 和 30 DAT 期人工除草;T3 = 出苗前除草剂(Acetachlore 14% + Bensulfuron methyle 4%);T4 = 出苗后除草剂(Pyrozosulfuran ethyle 10%),使用两个水稻品种,即 BRRI dhan 83 和 BRRI dhan 65。试验采用随机完全区组设计,三次重复。结果表明,萌芽前除草剂(T3)是最有效的除草方法,能显著提高产量。在该试验中,不除草导致产量损失 37.46%,而施用萌前除草剂比不除草增产 96.26%,其次是人工除草 79.14%和萌后除草剂 64.70%。芽后除草剂在分蘖丘-1 和稻草产量方面表现良好。免除草剂在各项生长和产量属性上的表现都最差,也是不育穗粒数-1 最高的原因。尽管有一定的效果,但由于人工除草费力且成本高昂,目前还没有有效的替代方法来替代除草剂控制水稻中的杂草。芒前除草剂能有效控制杂草,可用于有效控制水稻杂草。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信