[The effect of glycopyrrolate on intestinal spasm and hemodynamics in painless colonoscopy].

Y Zhang, M Y Yi, C F Fang, L Zhang, J Zheng, Y X Lu, Q Ye, Z J Ye, T Fang
{"title":"[The effect of glycopyrrolate on intestinal spasm and hemodynamics in painless colonoscopy].","authors":"Y Zhang, M Y Yi, C F Fang, L Zhang, J Zheng, Y X Lu, Q Ye, Z J Ye, T Fang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20240314-00164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the effects of glycopyrrolate on intestinal spasm and hemodynamics in painless colonoscopy. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 100 patients who were scheduled to undergo painless colonoscopy were selected as the study subjects and randomly divided into two groups by a computerized number method. Ten patients in both groups dropped out because of disruption of the study protocol, and 45 patients from each group were included in the final analysis. Before anesthesia induction, patients in group glycopyrrolate (group G) were injected with 0.2 mg glycopyrrolate, while those in congtrol group (group C) were injected with an equal amount of saline. The heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were recorded at T<sub>0</sub> (baseline period), T<sub>1</sub> (after anesthesia induction), T<sub>2</sub> (colonoscopy over sigmoid colon), T<sub>3</sub> (colonoscopy over the liver region), T<sub>4</sub> (after the end of examination), and T<sub>5</sub> (at the awakening phase), and the degree of intestinal spasm was assessed intraoperatively using the Likert's four-point scale. The numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to assess preoperative and postoperative pain. The incidence of adverse events was recorded. <b>Results:</b> The general data at baseline were not statistically different between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). During the procedure, patients in group G had lower intraoperative intestinal spasm scores than those in group C (<i>P</i>=0.028). Intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia occurrence were lower in group G than in group C (<i>P</i><0.05), and intraoperative norepinephrine use was also lower than in the group C (<i>P</i>=0.034). Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores were lower in group G (<i>P</i>=0.047), but patients who used glycopyrrolate had a higher proportion of dry mouth (<i>P</i>=0.035). <b>Conclusion:</b> During painless colonoscopy, preoperative administration of glycopyrrolate significantly improved intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations, reduced the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia, and relieved postoperative pain. However, glycopyrrolate use resulted in the risk of dry mouth.</p>","PeriodicalId":68309,"journal":{"name":"中华内科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华内科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20240314-00164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of glycopyrrolate on intestinal spasm and hemodynamics in painless colonoscopy. Methods: A total of 100 patients who were scheduled to undergo painless colonoscopy were selected as the study subjects and randomly divided into two groups by a computerized number method. Ten patients in both groups dropped out because of disruption of the study protocol, and 45 patients from each group were included in the final analysis. Before anesthesia induction, patients in group glycopyrrolate (group G) were injected with 0.2 mg glycopyrrolate, while those in congtrol group (group C) were injected with an equal amount of saline. The heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were recorded at T0 (baseline period), T1 (after anesthesia induction), T2 (colonoscopy over sigmoid colon), T3 (colonoscopy over the liver region), T4 (after the end of examination), and T5 (at the awakening phase), and the degree of intestinal spasm was assessed intraoperatively using the Likert's four-point scale. The numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to assess preoperative and postoperative pain. The incidence of adverse events was recorded. Results: The general data at baseline were not statistically different between the two groups (P>0.05). During the procedure, patients in group G had lower intraoperative intestinal spasm scores than those in group C (P=0.028). Intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia occurrence were lower in group G than in group C (P<0.05), and intraoperative norepinephrine use was also lower than in the group C (P=0.034). Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores were lower in group G (P=0.047), but patients who used glycopyrrolate had a higher proportion of dry mouth (P=0.035). Conclusion: During painless colonoscopy, preoperative administration of glycopyrrolate significantly improved intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations, reduced the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia, and relieved postoperative pain. However, glycopyrrolate use resulted in the risk of dry mouth.

[甘草酸苷对无痛结肠镜检查中肠痉挛和血液动力学的影响]。
目的:研究甘草酸苷对无痛结肠镜检查中肠痉挛和血液动力学的影响:研究甘草酸苷对无痛结肠镜检查中肠痉挛和血液动力学的影响。方法选取 100 名计划接受无痛结肠镜检查的患者作为研究对象,通过计算机编号法随机分为两组。两组中均有 10 名患者因违反研究方案而退出,最终分析包括两组各 45 名患者。麻醉诱导前,给甘珀酸组(G 组)患者注射 0.2 毫克甘珀酸,而给康托洛尔组(C 组)患者注射等量的生理盐水。分别在 T0(基线期)、T1(麻醉诱导后)、T2(乙状结肠结肠镜检查)、T3(肝区结肠镜检查)、T4(检查结束后)和 T5(苏醒期)记录心率、收缩压和舒张压,术中使用李克特四分法评估肠痉挛程度。术前和术后疼痛采用数字评分量表(NRS)进行评估。记录了不良事件的发生率。结果两组患者基线时的一般数据无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在手术过程中,G 组患者的术中肠痉挛评分低于 C 组(P=0.028)。G 组术中低血压和心动过缓发生率低于 C 组(PP=0.034)。G 组术后视觉模拟量表疼痛评分较低(P=0.047),但使用甘珀酸的患者口干的比例较高(P=0.035)。结论在无痛结肠镜检查过程中,术前服用甘羟吡咯酯可显著改善术中血流动力学波动,降低低血压和心动过缓的发生率,并缓解术后疼痛。然而,使用甘草酸苷会导致口干的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19688
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信