Active surveillance of immunization adverse effects: a multicentre, open-label, three-arm randomized uncontrolled trial in Ethiopia.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dawit Getachew Assefa, Tizalegn Tesefaye, Etaferaw Bekele, Genet Geberemickeal, Andualem Mebratu, Aschalew Gossaye Ejigu, Tariku Nigatu, Eden Dagnachew Zeleke
{"title":"Active surveillance of immunization adverse effects: a multicentre, open-label, three-arm randomized uncontrolled trial in Ethiopia.","authors":"Dawit Getachew Assefa, Tizalegn Tesefaye, Etaferaw Bekele, Genet Geberemickeal, Andualem Mebratu, Aschalew Gossaye Ejigu, Tariku Nigatu, Eden Dagnachew Zeleke","doi":"10.1093/inthealth/ihae040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Participant-centred active adverse event following immunization (AEFI) surveillance can offer real-time vaccine safety data and help in signal detection. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of participant-centred active adverse events (AEs) surveillance following measles immunization in Gedeo Zone health facilities in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An open-label, multicentred, three-arm randomized uncontrolled trial was conducted from 1 June to 21 October 2023. After assessing enrolment eligibility, the study participants were randomized into three groups (short message service [SMS], telephone interview, and diary card). They were expected to report AEs in children 1 week after receiving immunization. Binary and multivariable logistic regression and χ2 tests were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 396 participants randomized into the three groups, 80.8% (320 participants) reported back about their children's AE status. Participants in the telephone interview group exhibited a substantially superior response rate (93.2% of 132 participants; p<0.00001) compared with the SMS (71.2%) and diary card (78%) groups. The likelihood of reporting the status of AEs experienced by children was lower by 77% (adjusted odds ratio 0.23 [95% confidence interval 0.1 to 0.52], p-value <0.00001) in the diary card group compared with the telephone interview group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, a telephone interview was found to be the best method for AEFI reporting. Participant-centred active AE surveillance could potentially permit more rapid identification of emerging safety signals. Trial registration:  https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05803538.</p>","PeriodicalId":49060,"journal":{"name":"International Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihae040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Participant-centred active adverse event following immunization (AEFI) surveillance can offer real-time vaccine safety data and help in signal detection. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of participant-centred active adverse events (AEs) surveillance following measles immunization in Gedeo Zone health facilities in Ethiopia.

Methods: An open-label, multicentred, three-arm randomized uncontrolled trial was conducted from 1 June to 21 October 2023. After assessing enrolment eligibility, the study participants were randomized into three groups (short message service [SMS], telephone interview, and diary card). They were expected to report AEs in children 1 week after receiving immunization. Binary and multivariable logistic regression and χ2 tests were used to analyse the data.

Results: Among the 396 participants randomized into the three groups, 80.8% (320 participants) reported back about their children's AE status. Participants in the telephone interview group exhibited a substantially superior response rate (93.2% of 132 participants; p<0.00001) compared with the SMS (71.2%) and diary card (78%) groups. The likelihood of reporting the status of AEs experienced by children was lower by 77% (adjusted odds ratio 0.23 [95% confidence interval 0.1 to 0.52], p-value <0.00001) in the diary card group compared with the telephone interview group.

Conclusions: In this study, a telephone interview was found to be the best method for AEFI reporting. Participant-centred active AE surveillance could potentially permit more rapid identification of emerging safety signals. Trial registration:  https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05803538.

主动监测免疫接种不良反应:埃塞俄比亚的一项多中心、开放标签、三臂随机无对照试验。
背景:以参与者为中心的免疫接种后主动不良事件(AEFI)监测可提供实时的疫苗安全数据,并有助于信号检测。本研究旨在评估在埃塞俄比亚 Gedeo 区卫生机构进行麻疹免疫接种后以参与者为中心的主动不良事件(AEs)监测的有效性:方法:2023 年 6 月 1 日至 10 月 21 日进行了一项开放标签、多中心、三臂随机非对照试验。在评估报名资格后,研究参与者被随机分为三组(短信服务[SMS]组、电话访谈组和日记卡组)。他们应在接受免疫接种一周后报告儿童的AEs。采用二元和多变量逻辑回归及χ2检验分析数据:在随机分为三组的 396 名参与者中,80.8%(320 人)报告了其子女的 AE 状况。电话访谈组的参与者的回复率更高(132 位参与者中的 93.2%;pConclusions):本研究发现,电话访谈是报告 AEFI 的最佳方法。以参与者为中心的主动 AE 监测有可能更快地识别新出现的安全信号。试验注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05803538。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Health
International Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Health is an official journal of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It publishes original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of global health including the social and economic aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases, health systems research, policy and implementation, and the evaluation of disease control programmes and healthcare delivery solutions. It aims to stimulate scientific and policy debate and provide a forum for analysis and opinion sharing for individuals and organisations engaged in all areas of global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信