Effect of acidosis in the late-finishing phase on rumen fermentation in feedlot steers.

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-05-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txae084
Haley F Linder, Larry L Berger, Joshua C McCann
{"title":"Effect of acidosis in the late-finishing phase on rumen fermentation in feedlot steers.","authors":"Haley F Linder, Larry L Berger, Joshua C McCann","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective was to determine the effects of induced acidosis in the late-finishing phase on rumen fermentation in feedlot steers. Eleven ruminally cannulated steers (body weight [BW] = 795 kg ± 54) were blocked into two groups based on initial BW. For 195 d prior to the start of the study, cattle were consuming a basal finishing diet (60% dry-rolled corn, 15% modified distillers grains, 15% corn silage, and 10% ground corn-based supplement). Steers were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments: control (<b>CON</b>), or induced acidosis (<b>ACD</b>). Both treatments were fasted for 24 h then fed the basal finishing diet. Steers on the ACD treatment received 0.05% of BW of wheat starch via rumen cannula at 0800 and 2000 hours on day 1 and ad libitum refeeding following the fast. On days 1 and 2, CON steers were provided 25% of allotted feed every 6 h. Rumen fluid was collected every 4 h during the challenge period (hours 0 to 48), and 0, 6, and 12 h after feeding during the recovery period (hours 54 to 96). Rumen fluid was analyzed for pH, ammonia, volatile fatty acids (<b>VFA</b>), and lactate. Fecal grab samples were collected every 8 h to determine fecal pH. A treatment × day interaction (<i>P </i>= 0.03) was observed for dry matter intake during the challenge period with steers on the ACD treatments consuming more on day 1 than CON steers. Intake was not different on day 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.88). A treatment × hour effect (<i>P </i>< 0.01) was observed for ruminal pH during the challenge period with the ACD steers having a lesser pH than CON from hours 12 to 32. Duration of time below a pH of 5.6 during the challenge period was greater (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for ACD steers than CON. During the challenge period, a treatment × time interaction (<i>P </i>= 0.04) was observed for total VFA concentration with ACD steers having greater total VFA concentration from hours 12 to 36. Acetate to propionate ratio (A:P) was affected by treatment × hour (<i>P</i> = 0.04) with CON steers having greater A:P from hours 28 to 48. Rumen ammonia and lactate concentrations did not differ (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.25) between treatments or the interaction with time. Challenge and recovery period fecal pH were not affected (<i>P </i>≥ 0.13) by treatment, time, or their interaction. Recovery period ruminal pH was not different (<i>P </i>= 0.99) between treatments. For the recovery period, total VFA and ammonia concentration were not affected by treatment, time, or their interaction (<i>P </i>≥ 0.07). Ruminal pH and VFA were affected in the initial 48 h of induced acidosis in the late-finishing phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective was to determine the effects of induced acidosis in the late-finishing phase on rumen fermentation in feedlot steers. Eleven ruminally cannulated steers (body weight [BW] = 795 kg ± 54) were blocked into two groups based on initial BW. For 195 d prior to the start of the study, cattle were consuming a basal finishing diet (60% dry-rolled corn, 15% modified distillers grains, 15% corn silage, and 10% ground corn-based supplement). Steers were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments: control (CON), or induced acidosis (ACD). Both treatments were fasted for 24 h then fed the basal finishing diet. Steers on the ACD treatment received 0.05% of BW of wheat starch via rumen cannula at 0800 and 2000 hours on day 1 and ad libitum refeeding following the fast. On days 1 and 2, CON steers were provided 25% of allotted feed every 6 h. Rumen fluid was collected every 4 h during the challenge period (hours 0 to 48), and 0, 6, and 12 h after feeding during the recovery period (hours 54 to 96). Rumen fluid was analyzed for pH, ammonia, volatile fatty acids (VFA), and lactate. Fecal grab samples were collected every 8 h to determine fecal pH. A treatment × day interaction (P = 0.03) was observed for dry matter intake during the challenge period with steers on the ACD treatments consuming more on day 1 than CON steers. Intake was not different on day 2 (P = 0.88). A treatment × hour effect (P < 0.01) was observed for ruminal pH during the challenge period with the ACD steers having a lesser pH than CON from hours 12 to 32. Duration of time below a pH of 5.6 during the challenge period was greater (P < 0.01) for ACD steers than CON. During the challenge period, a treatment × time interaction (P = 0.04) was observed for total VFA concentration with ACD steers having greater total VFA concentration from hours 12 to 36. Acetate to propionate ratio (A:P) was affected by treatment × hour (P = 0.04) with CON steers having greater A:P from hours 28 to 48. Rumen ammonia and lactate concentrations did not differ (P ≥ 0.25) between treatments or the interaction with time. Challenge and recovery period fecal pH were not affected (P ≥ 0.13) by treatment, time, or their interaction. Recovery period ruminal pH was not different (P = 0.99) between treatments. For the recovery period, total VFA and ammonia concentration were not affected by treatment, time, or their interaction (P ≥ 0.07). Ruminal pH and VFA were affected in the initial 48 h of induced acidosis in the late-finishing phase.

犊牛后期酸中毒对瘤胃发酵的影响
研究的目的是确定饲养场阉牛后期酸中毒对瘤胃发酵的影响。根据初始体重将 11 头瘤胃插管母牛(体重 [BW] = 795 kg ± 54)分为两组。在研究开始前的 195 天内,牛一直食用基础精饲料(60% 干轧玉米、15% 改良蒸馏谷物、15% 玉米青贮和 10% 磨碎的玉米基补充物)。牛被随机分配到两种处理中的一种:对照组(CON)或诱导酸中毒组(ACD)。两种处理均禁食 24 小时,然后饲喂基础精饲料。ACD处理的阉牛在第1天的8:00和20:00通过瘤胃插管摄入占体重0.05%的小麦淀粉,禁食后自由采食。在第 1 天和第 2 天,每隔 6 小时向 CON 牛提供 25% 的分配饲料。在挑战期(0 至 48 小时),每隔 4 小时收集一次瘤胃液;在恢复期(54 至 96 小时),在喂食后的 0、6 和 12 小时收集瘤胃液。对瘤胃液的 pH 值、氨、挥发性脂肪酸 (VFA) 和乳酸盐进行分析。每隔 8 小时收集一次粪便样本,以测定粪便 pH 值。在挑战期,干物质摄入量存在处理 × 天的交互作用(P = 0.03),ACD 处理的母牛在第 1 天的摄入量高于 CON 处理的母牛。第 2 天的摄入量没有差异(P = 0.88)。在总挥发性脂肪酸浓度方面,观察到了处理×小时效应(P P P = 0.04),ACD 牛在第 12 小时至第 36 小时的总挥发性脂肪酸浓度更高。乙酸盐与丙酸盐的比率(A:P)受处理×小时的影响(P = 0.04),CON 牛在第 28 至 48 小时的 A:P 较大。瘤胃氨和乳酸盐浓度在不同处理间没有差异(P ≥ 0.25),也没有与时间的交互作用。挑战期和恢复期粪便 pH 值不受处理、时间或它们之间相互作用的影响(P ≥ 0.13)。不同处理之间恢复期瘤胃 pH 值无差异(P = 0.99)。在恢复期,总 VFA 和氨浓度不受处理、时间或它们之间相互作用的影响(P ≥ 0.07)。在后期诱导酸中毒的最初 48 小时内,瘤胃 pH 值和 VFA 均受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信