Impact of telehealth on patient-provider communication in prenatal care for pregnant women from underserved settings.

Q2 Social Sciences
Mounika Polavarapu, Shipra Singh, Shivangi Sharma, Grace Hamilton
{"title":"Impact of telehealth on patient-provider communication in prenatal care for pregnant women from underserved settings.","authors":"Mounika Polavarapu, Shipra Singh, Shivangi Sharma, Grace Hamilton","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2024.2360820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Telehealth has emerged as a promising supplementary modality in prenatal care. However, its impact on patient-provider communication (PPC), especially among pregnant women from underserved settings, requires comprehensive evaluation. This study examined the factors associated with the quality of patient-provider communication during the COVID-19 pandemic among pregnant telehealth users and non-users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a cross-sectional study design, 242 women were surveyed (response rate = 23%) regarding their experience with telehealth, quality of PPC, and experiences of discrimination during prenatal care. Multiple regression models were used to identify the factors associated with the quality of PPC during the COVID-19 pandemic. A sub-group analysis explored the factors associated with the quality of PPC separately among telehealth users and non-users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the participants were on Medicaid (95%) and self-identified as Black/African American (57.3%). Regression analyses revealed a negative relationship between telehealth use during pregnancy and the quality of PPC (<i>β</i> = -1.13, P = 0.002). Irrespective of the telehealth use, the experience of discrimination was associated with poor quality of PPC among users (<i>β</i> = -3.47, P = .02) and non-users (<i>β</i> = -.78, P = .03), while adjusting for sociodemographic factors and social support during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While telehealth offers advantages like convenience, increased accessibility, and continuity of care, challenges in establishing effective PPC in virtual settings have emerged that emphasize the necessity for comprehensive provider training extending beyond technical competencies. The persistent issue of perceived discrimination, impacting PPC across both groups, underscores the necessity to rethink existing strategies of mandatory training to increase providers' knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"292-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2024.2360820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Telehealth has emerged as a promising supplementary modality in prenatal care. However, its impact on patient-provider communication (PPC), especially among pregnant women from underserved settings, requires comprehensive evaluation. This study examined the factors associated with the quality of patient-provider communication during the COVID-19 pandemic among pregnant telehealth users and non-users.

Methods: Using a cross-sectional study design, 242 women were surveyed (response rate = 23%) regarding their experience with telehealth, quality of PPC, and experiences of discrimination during prenatal care. Multiple regression models were used to identify the factors associated with the quality of PPC during the COVID-19 pandemic. A sub-group analysis explored the factors associated with the quality of PPC separately among telehealth users and non-users.

Results: The majority of the participants were on Medicaid (95%) and self-identified as Black/African American (57.3%). Regression analyses revealed a negative relationship between telehealth use during pregnancy and the quality of PPC (β = -1.13, P = 0.002). Irrespective of the telehealth use, the experience of discrimination was associated with poor quality of PPC among users (β = -3.47, P = .02) and non-users (β = -.78, P = .03), while adjusting for sociodemographic factors and social support during pregnancy.

Discussion: While telehealth offers advantages like convenience, increased accessibility, and continuity of care, challenges in establishing effective PPC in virtual settings have emerged that emphasize the necessity for comprehensive provider training extending beyond technical competencies. The persistent issue of perceived discrimination, impacting PPC across both groups, underscores the necessity to rethink existing strategies of mandatory training to increase providers' knowledge.

远程医疗对服务不足地区孕妇产前护理中患者与医护人员沟通的影响。
引言远程医疗已成为产前护理中一种前景广阔的辅助方式。然而,它对患者与医护人员沟通(PPC)的影响,尤其是对来自服务不足地区的孕妇的影响,需要进行全面评估。本研究探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,孕妇远程医疗用户和非用户中与患者-医患沟通质量相关的因素:方法:采用横断面研究设计,对 242 名妇女(回复率 = 23%)进行了调查,内容涉及她们在产前护理期间使用远程保健的经验、PPC 的质量以及遭受歧视的经历。研究采用多元回归模型确定了与 COVID-19 大流行期间产前护理质量相关的因素。一项分组分析分别探讨了远程医疗用户和非用户中与产前护理质量相关的因素:结果:大多数参与者享受医疗补助(95%),自我认同为黑人/非洲裔美国人(57.3%)。回归分析表明,孕期使用远程保健与 PPC 质量之间存在负相关关系(β = -1.13, P = 0.002)。无论是否使用远程保健,在调整社会人口因素和孕期社会支持的情况下,使用远程保健者(β = -3.47,P = .02)和未使用远程保健者(β = -.78,P = .03)遭受歧视的经历与 PPC 质量差有关:讨论:虽然远程医疗具有便利性、可及性和护理连续性等优势,但在虚拟环境中建立有效的 PPC 所面临的挑战也随之出现,这强调了对医疗服务提供者进行技术能力以外的全面培训的必要性。持续存在的认知歧视问题影响了两个群体的 PPC,这突出表明有必要重新思考现有的强制培训策略,以增加医疗服务提供者的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信