Comparison between screening for primary aldosteronism with and without drug adjustment.

IF 1.8 4区 医学
Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2024-05-03 Epub Date: 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1080/08037051.2024.2350981
Yanlong Hua, Qing He
{"title":"Comparison between screening for primary aldosteronism with and without drug adjustment.","authors":"Yanlong Hua, Qing He","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2024.2350981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Few studies have evaluated the performance of non-drug-adjusted primary aldosteronism (PA) screening. Therefore, we aimed to examine the consistency between PA screening results with and without drug adjustment and to explore the effectiveness of screening without drug adjustment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 650 consecutive patients with a high risk of incidence PA. Patients who initially screened positive underwent rescreening with drug adjustments and confirmatory tests. Regarding the remaining patients, one of every three consecutive patients underwent rescreening with drug adjustments and confirmatory tests. The changes in aldosterone and renin concentrations were compared between patients with essential hypertension (EH) and those with PA before and after drug adjustment. Sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the diagnostic performance of screening without drug adjustment, using the confirmatory test results as the reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 650 patients with hypertension for PA. Forty-nine patients were diagnosed with PA and 195 with EH. Regarding drugs, 519 patients were taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), or diuretics alone or in combination. Forty-one patients were taking beta-blockers. Ninety patients were taking beta-blockers in combination with other drugs. In patients treated with ACEIs, ARBs, CCBs, or diuretics alone, or in combination, or beta-blockers alone, PA positivity was determined using the criteria, aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) >38 pg/mL/pg/mL and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) >100 pg/mL, and negativity, using the criteria, ARR <9 pg/mL/pg/mL; the sensitivity and specificity were 94.7% and 94.5%, respectively. After drug adjustment, the sensitivity and specificity of screening were 92.1% and 89%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients not treated with beta-blockers combined with others, when ARR >38 pg/mL/pg/mL and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) >100 pg/mL, or, ARR <9 pg/mL/pg/mL, non-drug-adjusted screening results were identical to with drug adjustment. Non-drug-adjusted screening <u>c</u>ould reduce the chance of medication adjustment, enable patients to continue their treatments and avoiding adverse effects, is of clinical importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9000,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2024.2350981","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Few studies have evaluated the performance of non-drug-adjusted primary aldosteronism (PA) screening. Therefore, we aimed to examine the consistency between PA screening results with and without drug adjustment and to explore the effectiveness of screening without drug adjustment.

Methods: This prospective study included 650 consecutive patients with a high risk of incidence PA. Patients who initially screened positive underwent rescreening with drug adjustments and confirmatory tests. Regarding the remaining patients, one of every three consecutive patients underwent rescreening with drug adjustments and confirmatory tests. The changes in aldosterone and renin concentrations were compared between patients with essential hypertension (EH) and those with PA before and after drug adjustment. Sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the diagnostic performance of screening without drug adjustment, using the confirmatory test results as the reference.

Results: We screened 650 patients with hypertension for PA. Forty-nine patients were diagnosed with PA and 195 with EH. Regarding drugs, 519 patients were taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), or diuretics alone or in combination. Forty-one patients were taking beta-blockers. Ninety patients were taking beta-blockers in combination with other drugs. In patients treated with ACEIs, ARBs, CCBs, or diuretics alone, or in combination, or beta-blockers alone, PA positivity was determined using the criteria, aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) >38 pg/mL/pg/mL and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) >100 pg/mL, and negativity, using the criteria, ARR <9 pg/mL/pg/mL; the sensitivity and specificity were 94.7% and 94.5%, respectively. After drug adjustment, the sensitivity and specificity of screening were 92.1% and 89%, respectively.

Conclusions: In patients not treated with beta-blockers combined with others, when ARR >38 pg/mL/pg/mL and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) >100 pg/mL, or, ARR <9 pg/mL/pg/mL, non-drug-adjusted screening results were identical to with drug adjustment. Non-drug-adjusted screening could reduce the chance of medication adjustment, enable patients to continue their treatments and avoiding adverse effects, is of clinical importance.

原发性醛固酮增多症筛查中药物调整与非药物调整的比较。
目的:很少有研究对未经药物调整的原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)筛查结果进行评估。因此,我们旨在检查药物调整和非药物调整下 PA 筛查结果的一致性,并探讨非药物调整筛查的有效性:这项前瞻性研究连续纳入了 650 名 PA 高危患者。方法:这项前瞻性研究连续纳入了 650 名高风险 PA 患者,最初筛查结果呈阳性的患者接受了药物调整后的再筛查和确证试验。至于其余患者,每三名连续患者中就有一人接受了调整药物和确证试验的再筛查。比较了药物调整前后原发性高血压(EH)患者和 PA 患者醛固酮和肾素浓度的变化。结果:我们对 650 名高血压患者进行了 PA 筛查。结果:我们对 650 名高血压患者进行了 PA 筛查,其中 49 名患者被确诊为 PA,195 名患者被确诊为 EH。在药物方面,519 名患者正在单独或联合使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)或利尿剂。41名患者正在服用β-受体阻滞剂。90名患者在服用β-受体阻滞剂的同时还服用了其他药物。在单独或联合使用 ACEIs、ARBs、CCBs 或利尿剂或单独使用β-受体阻滞剂的患者中,PA 阳性的判定标准是醛固酮与肾素比值 (ARR) >38 pg/mL/pg/mL,血浆醛固酮浓度 (PAC) >100 pg/mL;阴性的判定标准是 ARR 结论:在未接受β-受体阻滞剂联合治疗的患者中,当ARR>38 pg/mL/pg/mL且血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)>100 pg/mL时,或,ARR可减少药物调整的机会,使患者能够继续治疗并避免不良反应,具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信