The Tell on Telehealth

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anup D. Patel, Charuta Joshi, Rohit Das, John M. Stern, Susan T. Herman, Barry E. Gidal
{"title":"The Tell on Telehealth","authors":"Anup D. Patel, Charuta Joshi, Rohit Das, John M. Stern, Susan T. Herman, Barry E. Gidal","doi":"10.1177/15357597241255274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:Telehealth in epilepsy care is not new. During the COVID-19 public health emergency, telehealth became more readily used to deliver epilepsy care. However, a summarized guidance of use in caring for people with epilepsy utilizing telehealth is needed.Methods:Existing literature was reviewed to provide guidance on various aspects of telehealth. Billing aspects are reviewed. Recommendations and considerations along with benefits and barriers to telehealth are provided.Results:Telehealth can be a preferred delivery route of care for people with epilepsy in specific situations. Examples include psychiatric complaints, medication management, and follow-up visits for noncomplicated epilepsy care. In addition, telehealth is useful for patients who need postoperative visits, are not able to travel, or live in residential facilities. In-person care may be more suitable for patients who are medically complex, have language barriers or difficulty with resource access, hearing impaired, or have neurostimulation devices where remote monitoring or programming options are infeasible.Discussion:Telehealth care for people with epilepsy can be a useful and important method of care delivery. It should remain an option for providers to use in epilepsy clinical care. It is important for the neurology provider to understand the benefits, billing, and barriers to providing telehealth.","PeriodicalId":11742,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Currents","volume":"26 9-10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Currents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15357597241255274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:Telehealth in epilepsy care is not new. During the COVID-19 public health emergency, telehealth became more readily used to deliver epilepsy care. However, a summarized guidance of use in caring for people with epilepsy utilizing telehealth is needed.Methods:Existing literature was reviewed to provide guidance on various aspects of telehealth. Billing aspects are reviewed. Recommendations and considerations along with benefits and barriers to telehealth are provided.Results:Telehealth can be a preferred delivery route of care for people with epilepsy in specific situations. Examples include psychiatric complaints, medication management, and follow-up visits for noncomplicated epilepsy care. In addition, telehealth is useful for patients who need postoperative visits, are not able to travel, or live in residential facilities. In-person care may be more suitable for patients who are medically complex, have language barriers or difficulty with resource access, hearing impaired, or have neurostimulation devices where remote monitoring or programming options are infeasible.Discussion:Telehealth care for people with epilepsy can be a useful and important method of care delivery. It should remain an option for providers to use in epilepsy clinical care. It is important for the neurology provider to understand the benefits, billing, and barriers to providing telehealth.
关于远程保健的信息
目标:远程医疗在癫痫护理中的应用并不新鲜。在 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件期间,远程医疗更容易用于提供癫痫护理。方法:对现有文献进行回顾,为远程医疗的各个方面提供指导。回顾了计费方面的问题。结果:在特定情况下,远程医疗可以成为癫痫患者首选的护理途径。结果:在特定情况下,远程医疗可以成为癫痫患者首选的护理途径,例如精神疾病投诉、药物管理和非复杂性癫痫护理的随访。此外,远程医疗对于需要术后访视、无法旅行或居住在住宅设施中的患者也很有用。对于病情复杂、有语言障碍或难以获得资源、有听力障碍或有神经刺激装置(远程监控或编程选项不可行)的患者来说,面对面护理可能更合适。在癫痫临床护理中,它仍应是医疗服务提供者的一种选择。神经病学医疗服务提供者必须了解提供远程医疗的好处、费用和障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy Currents
Epilepsy Currents CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Currents is an open access, bi-monthly current-awareness journal providing reviews, commentaries and abstracts from the world’s literature on the research and treatment of epilepsy. Epilepsy Currents surveys and comments on all important research and developments in a format that is easy to read and reference. Each issue is divided into two main sections: Basic Science and Clinical Science. An outstanding Editorial Board reviews the literature and assigns topics and articles to world experts for comment. In addition, the Editors commission authoritative review articles on important subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信