Amine-based CO2 capture on-board of marine ships: A comparison between MEA and MDEA/PZ aqueous solvents

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Fethi Khaled , Esam Hamad , Michael Traver , Christos Kalamaras
{"title":"Amine-based CO2 capture on-board of marine ships: A comparison between MEA and MDEA/PZ aqueous solvents","authors":"Fethi Khaled ,&nbsp;Esam Hamad ,&nbsp;Michael Traver ,&nbsp;Christos Kalamaras","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>International maritime shipping contributed nearly 3 % of global CO<sub>2</sub>eq emissions in 2018. The IMO has set an ambition to reach net zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from maritime activities by 2050 with checkpoints of 40 % reduction by 2030 and 70 % by 2040 compared to 2008 baseline levels. In addition to alternative fuels (LNG, biofuel, methanol, hydrogen, ammonia) and efficiency-based technologies, mobile carbon capture (MCC, called also ship-borne/based carbon capture SBCC) could become a plausible technology to help meet these decarbonization aspirations. In this work, we performed a simulation to compare the use of methyl-ethanolamine (MEA) and methyl-di-ethanolamine/piperazine (MDEA/PZ) aqueous mixtures for chemical temperature swing separation of CO<sub>2</sub> on-board a ship. We studied the main MCC system integration and design parameters and demonstrated that MDEA/PZ could represent a more efficient and cheaper path than MEA due to the heat availability limitations from the exhaust stream of the ship. Specifically, MDEA/PZ could enable 10 % savings in heat demand at the reboiler compared to MEA (3.3 vs 3.7 GJ/tCO<sub>2</sub>). Additionally, we showed that an MDEA/PZ amine-based CO<sub>2</sub> capture and storage unit on-board the ship could lead to as low as 191$/ton CO<sub>2</sub> avoided compared to 281$/ton of CO<sub>2</sub> when using MEA</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 104168"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International maritime shipping contributed nearly 3 % of global CO2eq emissions in 2018. The IMO has set an ambition to reach net zero CO2 emissions from maritime activities by 2050 with checkpoints of 40 % reduction by 2030 and 70 % by 2040 compared to 2008 baseline levels. In addition to alternative fuels (LNG, biofuel, methanol, hydrogen, ammonia) and efficiency-based technologies, mobile carbon capture (MCC, called also ship-borne/based carbon capture SBCC) could become a plausible technology to help meet these decarbonization aspirations. In this work, we performed a simulation to compare the use of methyl-ethanolamine (MEA) and methyl-di-ethanolamine/piperazine (MDEA/PZ) aqueous mixtures for chemical temperature swing separation of CO2 on-board a ship. We studied the main MCC system integration and design parameters and demonstrated that MDEA/PZ could represent a more efficient and cheaper path than MEA due to the heat availability limitations from the exhaust stream of the ship. Specifically, MDEA/PZ could enable 10 % savings in heat demand at the reboiler compared to MEA (3.3 vs 3.7 GJ/tCO2). Additionally, we showed that an MDEA/PZ amine-based CO2 capture and storage unit on-board the ship could lead to as low as 191$/ton CO2 avoided compared to 281$/ton of CO2 when using MEA

海船上的胺基二氧化碳捕获:MEA 和 MDEA/PZ 水溶剂之间的比较
2018 年,国际海运排放的二氧化碳占全球总排放量的近 3%。国际海事组织(IMO)提出了到 2050 年实现海事活动二氧化碳净零排放的目标,与 2008 年的基线水平相比,检查点是到 2030 年减少 40%,到 2040 年减少 70%。除了替代燃料(液化天然气、生物燃料、甲醇、氢气、氨气)和基于效率的技术外,移动碳捕集(MCC,又称船载/船基碳捕集 SBCC)也可能成为帮助实现这些脱碳目标的可行技术。在这项工作中,我们进行了模拟,比较了使用甲基乙醇胺(MEA)和甲基二乙醇胺/哌嗪(MDEA/PZ)水性混合物在船上进行一氧化碳化学变温分离的情况。我们对主要的 MCC 系统集成和设计参数进行了研究,结果表明 MDEA/PZ 比 MEA 更有效、更便宜,因为受到船舶废气流热量供应的限制。具体而言,与 MEA 相比,MDEA/PZ 可使再沸器的热需求节省 10%(3.3 GJ/tCO 与 3.7 GJ/tCO)。此外,我们的研究还表明,在船上使用 MDEA/PZ 基于胺的一氧化碳捕获和存储单元,与使用 MEA 时的 281 美元/吨一氧化碳相比,每吨一氧化碳可节省 191 美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信