Addressing Configuration Uncertainty in Well Conditioning for a Rule-Based Model

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Oscar Ovanger, Jo Eidsvik, Jacob Skauvold, Ragnar Hauge, Ingrid Aarnes
{"title":"Addressing Configuration Uncertainty in Well Conditioning for a Rule-Based Model","authors":"Oscar Ovanger, Jo Eidsvik, Jacob Skauvold, Ragnar Hauge, Ingrid Aarnes","doi":"10.1007/s11004-024-10144-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rule-based reservoir models incorporate rules that mimic actual sediment deposition processes for accurate representation of geological patterns of sediment accumulation. Bayesian methods combine rule-based reservoir modelling and well data, with geometry and placement rules as part of the prior and well data accounted for by the likelihood. The focus here is on a shallow marine shoreface geometry of ordered sedimentary packages called bedsets. Shoreline advance and sediment build-up are described through progradation and aggradation parameters linked to individual bedset objects. Conditioning on data from non-vertical wells is studied. The emphasis is on the role of ‘configurations’—the order and arrangement of bedsets as observed within well intersections in establishing the coupling between well observations and modelled objects. A conditioning algorithm is presented that explicitly integrates uncertainty about configurations for observed intersections between the well and the bedset surfaces. As data volumes increase and model complexity grows, the proposed conditioning method eventually becomes computationally infeasible. It has significant potential, however, to support the development of more complex models and conditioning methods by serving as a reference for consistency in conditioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51117,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Geosciences","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-024-10144-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rule-based reservoir models incorporate rules that mimic actual sediment deposition processes for accurate representation of geological patterns of sediment accumulation. Bayesian methods combine rule-based reservoir modelling and well data, with geometry and placement rules as part of the prior and well data accounted for by the likelihood. The focus here is on a shallow marine shoreface geometry of ordered sedimentary packages called bedsets. Shoreline advance and sediment build-up are described through progradation and aggradation parameters linked to individual bedset objects. Conditioning on data from non-vertical wells is studied. The emphasis is on the role of ‘configurations’—the order and arrangement of bedsets as observed within well intersections in establishing the coupling between well observations and modelled objects. A conditioning algorithm is presented that explicitly integrates uncertainty about configurations for observed intersections between the well and the bedset surfaces. As data volumes increase and model complexity grows, the proposed conditioning method eventually becomes computationally infeasible. It has significant potential, however, to support the development of more complex models and conditioning methods by serving as a reference for consistency in conditioning.

Abstract Image

为基于规则的模型解决油井调节中的配置不确定性问题
基于规则的储层模型采用了模仿实际沉积过程的规则,以准确反映沉积物堆积的地质模式。贝叶斯方法将基于规则的储层建模与油井数据相结合,几何形状和位置规则是先验数据的一部分,而油井数据则由似然法计算。这里的重点是浅海海岸表面的几何形状,这些有序的沉积包称为床集。海岸线的推进和沉积物的堆积是通过与单个床组对象相连的渐进和渐退参数来描述的。研究了非垂直井数据的条件。重点放在 "配置 "的作用上,即在水井交汇处观测到的床组的顺序和排列,以建立水井观测数据与建模对象之间的耦合关系。本文介绍了一种调节算法,该算法明确整合了观测到的油井与层集表面交汇处配置的不确定性。随着数据量的增加和模型复杂性的提高,所提出的调节方法最终在计算上变得不可行。不过,该方法具有很大的潜力,可以作为调节一致性的参考,从而支持开发更复杂的模型和调节方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mathematical Geosciences
Mathematical Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mathematical Geosciences (formerly Mathematical Geology) publishes original, high-quality, interdisciplinary papers in geomathematics focusing on quantitative methods and studies of the Earth, its natural resources and the environment. This international publication is the official journal of the IAMG. Mathematical Geosciences is an essential reference for researchers and practitioners of geomathematics who develop and apply quantitative models to earth science and geo-engineering problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信