Viability of elutriation for the extraction of microplastics from environmental soil samples†

IF 3.5 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Kyle Forsythe, Mason Egermeier, Marcus Garcia, Rui Liu, Matthew Campen, Matteo Minghetti, Andrea Jilling and Jorge Gonzalez-Estrella
{"title":"Viability of elutriation for the extraction of microplastics from environmental soil samples†","authors":"Kyle Forsythe, Mason Egermeier, Marcus Garcia, Rui Liu, Matthew Campen, Matteo Minghetti, Andrea Jilling and Jorge Gonzalez-Estrella","doi":"10.1039/D4VA00087K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this study, we evaluated the suitability of elutriation, a method successfully employed in the extraction of microplastics from marine sediments, for the extraction of microplastics from freshwater and terrestrial soils. Five soils were sampled throughout Oklahoma, USA in order to capture a range of sand, silt, clay, and organic matter composition. Each soil was subjected to microplastic extraction with and without elutriation, followed by digestion in 7.5% NaOCl, and then flotation in 6 M ZnCl<small><sub>2</sub></small>. The mass of each soil was measured after elutriation to determine sample mass reduction, and multiple methods including fluorescence imaging and automated particle counting through ImageJ, Attenuated Total Reflectence-Fourier Transfor Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), and Pyrolysis-coupled Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (py-GC/MS) were used to determine microplastic quantity, mass, and characteristics. <em>T</em>-test was used to check for statistically-significant differences between methods in terms of mass or particle quantity. For all tested soils, elutriation resulted in greater sample mass reduction than non-elutriated samples, and was between 59.0–97.3% for the tested soils. Furthermore, no statistically significant (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) differences were observed in particle quantification or polymer mass between methods, and no differences were observed for polymer or size distribution. Additionally, 33% more polymers were positively identified (<em>R</em><small><sup>2</sup></small> = 70%) by ATR-FTIR analysis in elutriated samples compared to non-elutriated soils. The mass reduction provided by elutriation allows for the processing of larger sample volumes, leading to greater accuracy and sensitivity in detecting microplastics. As such, we recommend elutriation be performed as a pretreatment step to extract microplastics from soils.</p>","PeriodicalId":72941,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science. Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/va/d4va00087k?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science. Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/va/d4va00087k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the suitability of elutriation, a method successfully employed in the extraction of microplastics from marine sediments, for the extraction of microplastics from freshwater and terrestrial soils. Five soils were sampled throughout Oklahoma, USA in order to capture a range of sand, silt, clay, and organic matter composition. Each soil was subjected to microplastic extraction with and without elutriation, followed by digestion in 7.5% NaOCl, and then flotation in 6 M ZnCl2. The mass of each soil was measured after elutriation to determine sample mass reduction, and multiple methods including fluorescence imaging and automated particle counting through ImageJ, Attenuated Total Reflectence-Fourier Transfor Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), and Pyrolysis-coupled Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (py-GC/MS) were used to determine microplastic quantity, mass, and characteristics. T-test was used to check for statistically-significant differences between methods in terms of mass or particle quantity. For all tested soils, elutriation resulted in greater sample mass reduction than non-elutriated samples, and was between 59.0–97.3% for the tested soils. Furthermore, no statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences were observed in particle quantification or polymer mass between methods, and no differences were observed for polymer or size distribution. Additionally, 33% more polymers were positively identified (R2 = 70%) by ATR-FTIR analysis in elutriated samples compared to non-elutriated soils. The mass reduction provided by elutriation allows for the processing of larger sample volumes, leading to greater accuracy and sensitivity in detecting microplastics. As such, we recommend elutriation be performed as a pretreatment step to extract microplastics from soils.

Abstract Image

从环境土壤样本中提取微塑料的洗脱可行性
在这项研究中,我们评估了洗脱法(一种成功用于从海洋沉积物中提取微塑料的方法)是否适用于从淡水和陆地土壤中提取微塑料。我们在美国俄克拉荷马州各地采集了五种土壤样本,以捕捉各种砂、淤泥、粘土和有机物成分。对每种土壤都进行了微塑料萃取,包括洗脱和不洗脱,然后在 7.5% NaOCl 中消化,再在 6M ZnCl2 中浮选。洗脱后测量每种土壤的质量以确定样品质量的减少,并采用多种方法(包括通过 ImageJ 进行荧光成像和自动粒子计数、衰减全反射-傅立叶变换红外光谱法(ATR-FTIR)和热解耦合气相色谱/质谱法(py-GC/MS))确定微塑料的数量、质量和特征。采用 T 检验法检查不同方法在质量或颗粒数量方面是否存在显著的统计学差异。在所有测试土壤中,洗脱法比非洗脱法减少的样本质量更大,在测试土壤中,洗脱法减少的样本质量在 59.0-97.3% 之间。此外,在颗粒数量或聚合物质量方面,不同方法之间没有发现明显的统计学差异(p < 0.05),在聚合物或粒度分布方面也没有发现差异。此外,与未经过洗脱处理的土壤相比,通过 ATR-FTIR 分析,洗脱处理过的土壤样品中可确定的聚合物数量增加了 33%(R2 = 70%)。洗脱法减少了样品的质量,可以处理更大量的样品,从而提高了检测微塑料的准确性和灵敏度。因此,我们建议将洗脱作为从土壤中提取微塑料的预处理步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信