What On-site Inspectors Under the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Can Learn from The “Co-expertise Process” Experiences Implemented After the Chernobyl and Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accidents?

IF 1.9 4区地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS

pure and applied geophysics Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1007/s00024-024-03501-4

Win Thu Zar, Jacques Lochard, Martin B. Kalinowski, Andrew Collinson, Thierry Schneider

{"title":"What On-site Inspectors Under the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Can Learn from The “Co-expertise Process” Experiences Implemented After the Chernobyl and Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accidents?","authors":"Win Thu Zar, Jacques Lochard, Martin B. Kalinowski, Andrew Collinson, Thierry Schneider","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03501-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the event of an on-site inspection (OSI) under the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), inspectors and support staffs of the inspected state party may encounter situations presenting similarities to those resulting from past radiation emergencies. The Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear power plant accidents have shown that the so-called “co-expertise” process recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is an effective lever for empowering the affected populations so that they can take informed decisions concerning their own protection. After a reminder of the constituent elements of the co-expertise approach as well as the context of the CTBT inspections the article describes how some key elements of the co-expertise process could be incorporated in the training program of the surrogate on-site inspectors and inspection teams to address possible concerns regarding the consequences ofradiological contamination if present.</p>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03501-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the event of an on-site inspection (OSI) under the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), inspectors and support staffs of the inspected state party may encounter situations presenting similarities to those resulting from past radiation emergencies. The Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear power plant accidents have shown that the so-called “co-expertise” process recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is an effective lever for empowering the affected populations so that they can take informed decisions concerning their own protection. After a reminder of the constituent elements of the co-expertise approach as well as the context of the CTBT inspections the article describes how some key elements of the co-expertise process could be incorporated in the training program of the surrogate on-site inspectors and inspection teams to address possible concerns regarding the consequences ofradiological contamination if present.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

切尔诺贝利和福岛核电站事故后实施的 "共同专家程序 "经验可为《全面禁止核试验条约》下的现场视察员提供哪些借鉴？

在根据《全面禁止核试验条约》（CTBT）进行现场视察（OSI）时，被视察缔约国的视察员和辅助人员可能会遇到与以往辐射紧急情况相似的情况。切尔诺贝利和福岛核电站事故表明，国际辐射防护委员会（ICRP）建议的所谓 "共同鉴定 "程序是增强受影响民众能力的有效手段，使他们能够就自身防护做出知情决定。在回顾了共同鉴定方法的构成要素以及《全面禁核试条约》视察的背景之后，文章介绍了如何将共同鉴定程序的一些关键要素纳入代理现场视察员和视察小组的培训计划，以解决可能存在的对辐射污染后果的关切。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

5.00%

发文量

240

审稿时长

9.8 months

期刊介绍： pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.