Reckoning With Our Past and Righting Our Future: Report From the Behavior Therapy Task Force on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity/Expression Change Efforts (SOGIECEs)

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Jonathan S. Comer, Christopher Georgiadis, Katie Schmarder, Diane Chen, Claire A. Coyne, Omar G. Gudiño, Nikolaos Kazantzis, David A. Langer, Richard T. LeBeau, Richard T. Liu, Carmen McLean, Denise M. Sloan, Monnica T. Williams, John E. Pachankis
{"title":"Reckoning With Our Past and Righting Our Future: Report From the Behavior Therapy Task Force on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity/Expression Change Efforts (SOGIECEs)","authors":"Jonathan S. Comer,&nbsp;Christopher Georgiadis,&nbsp;Katie Schmarder,&nbsp;Diane Chen,&nbsp;Claire A. Coyne,&nbsp;Omar G. Gudiño,&nbsp;Nikolaos Kazantzis,&nbsp;David A. Langer,&nbsp;Richard T. LeBeau,&nbsp;Richard T. Liu,&nbsp;Carmen McLean,&nbsp;Denise M. Sloan,&nbsp;Monnica T. Williams,&nbsp;John E. Pachankis","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sexual orientation and gender identity/expression change efforts (SOGIECEs) are discredited practices that are associated with serious negative effects and incompatible with modern standards for clinical practice. Despite evidence linking SOGIECEs with serious iatrogenic effects, and despite support for LGBTQ+-affirmative care alternatives, SOGIECE practices persist. In the 1970s and 1980s, <em>Behavior Therapy</em> published articles testing and/or endorsing SOGIECEs, thereby contributing to their overall development, acceptance, and use. The <em>Behavior Therapy</em> Task Force on SOGIECEs was assembled to conduct a rigorous review of the SOGIECE articles published in <em>Behavior Therapy</em> and to decide whether, and what, formal action(s) should be taken on these articles. This report provides a detailed review of the historic SOGIECE literature published in <em>Behavior Therapy</em> and outlines the Task Force’s deliberative and democratic processes resulting in actions to: (1) add prominent advisory information to <em>k</em> = 24 SOGIECE papers in the form of digital “black box” disclaimers that caution readers that the SOGIECE practices tested or described in these papers are inconsistent with modern standards, (2) offset organizational financial benefits from the publication of these papers, and (3) promote LGBTQ+-affirmative practices. SOGIECEs are not the only concerning practices across the field’s history, and the pages of today’s scientific journals include practices that will be at odds with tomorrow’s moral standards and ethical guidelines. This report calls for precautionary measures and editorial safeguards to minimize the future likelihood and impact of problematic published scholarship, including the need to fully include those with relevant lived experiences in all aspects of clinical science and peer review.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789424000741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual orientation and gender identity/expression change efforts (SOGIECEs) are discredited practices that are associated with serious negative effects and incompatible with modern standards for clinical practice. Despite evidence linking SOGIECEs with serious iatrogenic effects, and despite support for LGBTQ+-affirmative care alternatives, SOGIECE practices persist. In the 1970s and 1980s, Behavior Therapy published articles testing and/or endorsing SOGIECEs, thereby contributing to their overall development, acceptance, and use. The Behavior Therapy Task Force on SOGIECEs was assembled to conduct a rigorous review of the SOGIECE articles published in Behavior Therapy and to decide whether, and what, formal action(s) should be taken on these articles. This report provides a detailed review of the historic SOGIECE literature published in Behavior Therapy and outlines the Task Force’s deliberative and democratic processes resulting in actions to: (1) add prominent advisory information to k = 24 SOGIECE papers in the form of digital “black box” disclaimers that caution readers that the SOGIECE practices tested or described in these papers are inconsistent with modern standards, (2) offset organizational financial benefits from the publication of these papers, and (3) promote LGBTQ+-affirmative practices. SOGIECEs are not the only concerning practices across the field’s history, and the pages of today’s scientific journals include practices that will be at odds with tomorrow’s moral standards and ethical guidelines. This report calls for precautionary measures and editorial safeguards to minimize the future likelihood and impact of problematic published scholarship, including the need to fully include those with relevant lived experiences in all aspects of clinical science and peer review.

反思我们的过去,纠正我们的未来:行为疗法工作组关于改变性取向和性别认同/表达努力(SOGIECEs)的报告
性取向和性别认同/表达改变疗法(SOGIECEs)是一种信誉扫地的治疗方法,会产生严重的负面影响,而且不符合现代临床实践标准。尽管有证据表明 SOGIECE 与严重的先天性影响有关,尽管人们支持 LGBTQ+ 平权护理替代方案,但 SOGIECE 做法依然存在。20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代,《行为疗法》发表了测试和/或认可 SOGIECE 的文章,从而促进了 SOGIECE 的整体发展、接受和使用。行为疗法》成立了 "SOGIECE 特别工作组",对《行为疗法》上发表的 SOGIECE 文章进行严格审查,并决定是否应对这些文章采取正式行动,以及采取何种行动。本报告详细回顾了《行为疗法》上发表的历史性 SOGIECE 文献,并概述了特别工作组的审议和民主程序,最终采取了以下行动:(1)在 k = 24 篇 SOGIECE 论文中以数字 "黑盒 "免责声明的形式添加醒目的咨询信息,提醒读者这些论文中测试或描述的 SOGIECE 实践不符合现代标准;(2)抵消组织从这些论文的发表中获得的经济利益;(3)推广 LGBTQ+ 平权实践。在科学领域的历史上,SOGIECE 并不是唯一令人担忧的做法,今天的科学期刊中也有一些做法与明天的道德标准和伦理准则相悖。本报告呼吁采取预防措施和编辑保障措施,以最大限度地减少未来发表有问题学术成果的可能性和影响,包括需要将具有相关生活经历的人充分纳入临床科学和同行评审的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信