Linearizing nonlinear gravity models: Biased BvOLS versus unbiased alternatives

IF 3.2 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Peter H. Egger, Michael Pfaffermayr
{"title":"Linearizing nonlinear gravity models: Biased BvOLS versus unbiased alternatives","authors":"Peter H. Egger,&nbsp;Michael Pfaffermayr","doi":"10.1111/jors.12714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of high-dimensional fixed-effects estimation has become customary with the estimation of gravity models of bilateral trade, migration, or commuting as outcome. However, fixed-effects methods can be used without incidental-parameter bias in a very small set of stochastic models. Alternatives to fixed-effects estimation are iterative-structural model estimation or linearizations of the structural model. Baier and Bergstrand deployed such a linearization. While easy to implement, the approach has drawbacks related to the approximation point and lack of observability of ingredients needed for the linearization. This compromises empirical work. The present paper provides a remedy to this problem by linearizing at the observed trade equilibrium.</p>","PeriodicalId":48059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regional Science","volume":"64 5","pages":"1545-1573"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jors.12714","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jors.12714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of high-dimensional fixed-effects estimation has become customary with the estimation of gravity models of bilateral trade, migration, or commuting as outcome. However, fixed-effects methods can be used without incidental-parameter bias in a very small set of stochastic models. Alternatives to fixed-effects estimation are iterative-structural model estimation or linearizations of the structural model. Baier and Bergstrand deployed such a linearization. While easy to implement, the approach has drawbacks related to the approximation point and lack of observability of ingredients needed for the linearization. This compromises empirical work. The present paper provides a remedy to this problem by linearizing at the observed trade equilibrium.

Abstract Image

非线性重力模型线性化:有偏见的 BvOLS 与无偏见的替代方案对比
在估算双边贸易、移民或通勤结果的引力模型时,使用高维固定效应估算已成为惯例。然而,固定效应方法只适用于极少量的随机模型,不会产生附带参数偏差。固定效应估算的替代方法是迭代结构模型估算或结构模型线性化。Baier 和 Bergstrand 采用了这种线性化方法。这种方法虽然易于实施,但存在近似点和线性化所需的成分缺乏可观测性等缺点。这影响了实证工作。本文通过在观察到的贸易均衡点上进行线性化,对这一问题进行了补救。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Regional Science (JRS) publishes original analytical research at the intersection of economics and quantitative geography. Since 1958, the JRS has published leading contributions to urban and regional thought including rigorous methodological contributions and seminal theoretical pieces. The JRS is one of the most highly cited journals in urban and regional research, planning, geography, and the environment. The JRS publishes work that advances our understanding of the geographic dimensions of urban and regional economies, human settlements, and policies related to cities and regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信