Planning Facebook message strategy and creative appeal for effective ad engagement – an exploratory study

IF 3.6 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Dorit Zimand Sheiner, Ofrit Kol, Shalom Levy
{"title":"Planning Facebook message strategy and creative appeal for effective ad engagement – an exploratory study","authors":"Dorit Zimand Sheiner, Ofrit Kol, Shalom Levy","doi":"10.1108/mip-06-2023-0293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Studying the effect of social media advertising on consumer engagement, this study analyzes the impact of shared-experience versus personal message strategies, informational versus transformational creative appeals and low-involvement products versus high-involvement products. It aims to determine how best to combine ad elements to affect consumer engagement on different levels.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using an online survey among 448 Facebook users, an experimental factorial design of 2 (message strategy conditions) X 2 (creative appeal conditions) X 2 (product types: TV vs. frozen pizza) was used. Each advertisement was evaluated on three facets of engagement: cognitive, psychological and behavioral.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Results indicate that informational appeal is preferable for all conditions. The effectiveness of message strategy differs by product type, and interactions between message and appeal are significant only for the high-involvement product. Additionally, it indicates that message strategy is most significant in affecting behavioral engagement and not necessarily cognitive or psychological engagement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>To develop effective Facebook ads, practitioners should use a personal/informational combination when working with high-involvement products and a shared-experience/informational combination when working with low-involvement products.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>An original grid for integrating message strategy and creative appeal is constructed in this paper. Besides behavioral engagement, it also evaluates cognitive and psychological engagement. By comparing products with a high and low involvement level, it provides marketers with actionable recommendations to increase social media campaign effectiveness.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48048,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-06-2023-0293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Studying the effect of social media advertising on consumer engagement, this study analyzes the impact of shared-experience versus personal message strategies, informational versus transformational creative appeals and low-involvement products versus high-involvement products. It aims to determine how best to combine ad elements to affect consumer engagement on different levels.

Design/methodology/approach

Using an online survey among 448 Facebook users, an experimental factorial design of 2 (message strategy conditions) X 2 (creative appeal conditions) X 2 (product types: TV vs. frozen pizza) was used. Each advertisement was evaluated on three facets of engagement: cognitive, psychological and behavioral.

Findings

Results indicate that informational appeal is preferable for all conditions. The effectiveness of message strategy differs by product type, and interactions between message and appeal are significant only for the high-involvement product. Additionally, it indicates that message strategy is most significant in affecting behavioral engagement and not necessarily cognitive or psychological engagement.

Practical implications

To develop effective Facebook ads, practitioners should use a personal/informational combination when working with high-involvement products and a shared-experience/informational combination when working with low-involvement products.

Originality/value

An original grid for integrating message strategy and creative appeal is constructed in this paper. Besides behavioral engagement, it also evaluates cognitive and psychological engagement. By comparing products with a high and low involvement level, it provides marketers with actionable recommendations to increase social media campaign effectiveness.

规划 Facebook 消息策略和创意吸引力以提高广告参与度--一项探索性研究
目的研究社交媒体广告对消费者参与度的影响,本研究分析了分享体验策略与个人消息策略、信息型创意诉求与转化型创意诉求以及低参与度产品与高参与度产品的影响。设计/方法/途径通过对 448 名 Facebook 用户进行在线调查,采用 2(信息策略条件)X 2(创意诉求条件)X 2(产品类型:电视与冷冻披萨)的实验因子设计。结果表明,在所有条件下,信息诉求都更受欢迎。信息策略的有效性因产品类型而异,信息与吸引力之间的交互作用仅对高参与度产品有显著影响。实践意义要开发有效的 Facebook 广告,从业人员在处理高参与度产品时应使用个人/信息组合,在处理低参与度产品时应使用分享体验/信息组合。 原创性/价值本文构建了一个整合信息策略和创意诉求的原创网格。除了行为参与度,它还评估了认知和心理参与度。通过比较高参与度和低参与度产品,它为营销人员提供了提高社交媒体营销效果的可行建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Marketing Intelligence & Planning (MIP) facilitates communication between researchers and practitioners, providing the users of research with a wealth of robust and relevant information. At a time when some journals are losing their relevance to industry and practical requirements, MIP successfully offers a bridge between academic and practitioner thinking, while retaining a high level of scientific rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信