Stem anteversion is not affected by proximal femur geometry in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Andrea Marcovigi, Gianluca Grandi, Luca Bianchi, Francesco Zambianchi, Marco Pavesi, Fabio Catani
{"title":"Stem anteversion is not affected by proximal femur geometry in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Andrea Marcovigi, Gianluca Grandi, Luca Bianchi, Francesco Zambianchi, Marco Pavesi, Fabio Catani","doi":"10.1186/s42836-024-00248-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the present study, the surgeon aimed to align the stem at 5° to 25° in anteversion. The robotic technology was used to measure stem anteversion with respect to proximal femur anteversion at different levels down the femur.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 102 consecutive patients underwent robotic-arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). 3D CT-based preoperative planning was performed to determine femoral neck version (FNV), posterior cortex anteversion (PCA), anterior cortex anteversion (ACA), and femoral metaphyseal axis anteversion (MAA) at 3 different levels: D (10 mm above lesser trochanter), E (the midpoint of the planned neck resection line) and F (head-neck junction). The robotic system was used to define and measure stem anteversion during surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean FNV was 6.6° (SD: 8.8°) and the mean MAA was consistently significantly higher than FNV, growing progressively from proximal to distal. Mean SV was 16.4° (SD: 4.7°). There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.16) between SV and MAA at the most distal measured level. In 96.1% cases, the stem was positioned inside the 5°-25° anteversion range.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Femoral anteversion progressively increased from neck to proximal metaphysis. Aligning the stem close to femoral anteversion 10 mm above the lesser trochanter often led to the desired component anteversion.</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"6 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11144328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00248-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the present study, the surgeon aimed to align the stem at 5° to 25° in anteversion. The robotic technology was used to measure stem anteversion with respect to proximal femur anteversion at different levels down the femur.

Methods: A total of 102 consecutive patients underwent robotic-arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). 3D CT-based preoperative planning was performed to determine femoral neck version (FNV), posterior cortex anteversion (PCA), anterior cortex anteversion (ACA), and femoral metaphyseal axis anteversion (MAA) at 3 different levels: D (10 mm above lesser trochanter), E (the midpoint of the planned neck resection line) and F (head-neck junction). The robotic system was used to define and measure stem anteversion during surgery.

Results: Mean FNV was 6.6° (SD: 8.8°) and the mean MAA was consistently significantly higher than FNV, growing progressively from proximal to distal. Mean SV was 16.4° (SD: 4.7°). There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.16) between SV and MAA at the most distal measured level. In 96.1% cases, the stem was positioned inside the 5°-25° anteversion range.

Conclusions: Femoral anteversion progressively increased from neck to proximal metaphysis. Aligning the stem close to femoral anteversion 10 mm above the lesser trochanter often led to the desired component anteversion.

在机器人辅助全髋关节置换术中,股骨近端几何形状不会影响骨干内翻。
背景:在本研究中,外科医生的目标是对准5°至25°内翻的骨干。采用机器人技术测量股骨近端反转与股骨下不同水平的骨干反转关系:共有102名患者接受了机器人手臂辅助全髋关节置换术(RTHA)。进行了基于三维 CT 的术前规划,以确定 3 个不同水平的股骨颈版本(FNV)、后皮质内翻(PCA)、前皮质内翻(ACA)和股骨骺轴内翻(MAA):D(小转子上方 10 毫米)、E(计划的颈部切除线中点)和 F(头颈交界处)。手术中使用机器人系统定义和测量茎干内翻:平均FNV为6.6°(标度:8.8°),平均MAA一直显著高于FNV,且从近端到远端逐渐增大。平均 SV 为 16.4°(标准差:4.7°)。在最远端的测量水平上,SV和MAA之间没有统计学意义上的差异(P = 0.16)。在96.1%的病例中,股骨柄位于5°-25°的内翻范围内:结论:股骨内翻从股骨颈到近端干骺端逐渐增加。将骨干对准小转子上方10毫米处接近股骨内翻的位置,往往能获得理想的组件内翻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信