{"title":"Long-term follow-up of pallidal deep brain stimulation for craniocervical dystonia: is the globus pallidus internus the best target?","authors":"Zhuoling Zhao, Zhiwei Ren, Yongsheng Hu, Kaijia Yu, Fangzhao Yin, Jianyu Li, Guojun Zhang","doi":"10.3171/2024.3.FOCUS23890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Craniocervical dystonia (CCD) is a common type of segmental dystonia, which is a disabling disease that has been frequently misdiagnosed. Blepharospasm or cervical dystonia is the most usual symptom initially. Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) has been widely used for treating CCD, its clinical outcome has been primarily evaluated in small-scale studies. This research examines the sustained clinical effectiveness of DBS of the GPi in individuals diagnosed with CCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors report 24 patients (14 women, 10 men) with refractory CCD who underwent DBS of the GPi between 2016 and 2023. The severity and disability of the dystonia were evaluated using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS). The BFMDRS scores were collected preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and at the most recent follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age at onset was 52.0 ± 11.0 years (range 33-71 years) and the mean disease duration was 63.3 ± 73.3 months (range 7-360 months) (values for continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± SD). The mean follow-up period was 37.5 ± 23.5 months (range 6-84 months). The mean total BFMDRS motor scores at the 3 different time points were 13.3 ± 9.4 preoperatively, 5.0 ± 4.7 (55.3% improvement, p < 0.001) at 6 months, and 4.5 ± 3.6 (56.6% improvement, p < 0.001) at last follow-up. The outcomes were deemed poor in 6 individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inferences drawn from the findings suggest that DBS of the GPi has long-lasting effectiveness and certain limitations in managing refractory CCD. The expected stability of the clinical outcome is not achieved. Patients with specific types of dystonia might consider targets other than GPi for a more precise therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.3.FOCUS23890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Craniocervical dystonia (CCD) is a common type of segmental dystonia, which is a disabling disease that has been frequently misdiagnosed. Blepharospasm or cervical dystonia is the most usual symptom initially. Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) has been widely used for treating CCD, its clinical outcome has been primarily evaluated in small-scale studies. This research examines the sustained clinical effectiveness of DBS of the GPi in individuals diagnosed with CCD.
Methods: The authors report 24 patients (14 women, 10 men) with refractory CCD who underwent DBS of the GPi between 2016 and 2023. The severity and disability of the dystonia were evaluated using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS). The BFMDRS scores were collected preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and at the most recent follow-up visit.
Results: The mean age at onset was 52.0 ± 11.0 years (range 33-71 years) and the mean disease duration was 63.3 ± 73.3 months (range 7-360 months) (values for continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± SD). The mean follow-up period was 37.5 ± 23.5 months (range 6-84 months). The mean total BFMDRS motor scores at the 3 different time points were 13.3 ± 9.4 preoperatively, 5.0 ± 4.7 (55.3% improvement, p < 0.001) at 6 months, and 4.5 ± 3.6 (56.6% improvement, p < 0.001) at last follow-up. The outcomes were deemed poor in 6 individuals.
Conclusions: Inferences drawn from the findings suggest that DBS of the GPi has long-lasting effectiveness and certain limitations in managing refractory CCD. The expected stability of the clinical outcome is not achieved. Patients with specific types of dystonia might consider targets other than GPi for a more precise therapy.