Evaluating the efficiency of two different over-the-counter tooth whitening systems: a randomised controlled clinical trial.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Eenass Krayem, Avijit Banerjee, Hussam Milly
{"title":"Evaluating the efficiency of two different over-the-counter tooth whitening systems: a randomised controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Eenass Krayem, Avijit Banerjee, Hussam Milly","doi":"10.1038/s41405-024-00227-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare whitening efficiency and tooth sensitivity (TS) of two different over the counter (OTC) whitening systems in comparison to conventional at-home bleaching using 20% carbamide peroxide.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted with three parallel groups (n = 13): (A) at-home whitening using 20% carbamide peroxide (20% CP), (B) OTC ready-to-use gel trays and (C) OTC-paint on gel. Clinical colour change values (ΔE) were measured using spectrophotometry at T0: baseline, T1: 7-day and T2: 14-day from whitening start, T3: 2 weeks and T4: 6 months after whitening end. TS was recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS). ΔE and TS values were statistically analysed. The level of significance for all tests was 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in ∆E values were recorded between the experimental groups. ∆E values were significantly higher in the 20% CP conventional at-home whitening group. TS measurements were significantly higher in the 20% CP whitening group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conventional at-home whitening revealed significantly improved colour change when compared to the OTC-paint on gel and OTC ready-to-use gel tray whitening systems. There was a significant colour relapse in OTC systems.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The use of tested OTC systems is not recommended as they are not effective in a clear and prolonged improved shade change. Conventional at-home whitening using 20% CP showed higher whitening efficiency and colour stability. This trial was registered with a International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN23096480), Registration date: 12/04/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00227-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare whitening efficiency and tooth sensitivity (TS) of two different over the counter (OTC) whitening systems in comparison to conventional at-home bleaching using 20% carbamide peroxide.

Materials and methods: A randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted with three parallel groups (n = 13): (A) at-home whitening using 20% carbamide peroxide (20% CP), (B) OTC ready-to-use gel trays and (C) OTC-paint on gel. Clinical colour change values (ΔE) were measured using spectrophotometry at T0: baseline, T1: 7-day and T2: 14-day from whitening start, T3: 2 weeks and T4: 6 months after whitening end. TS was recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS). ΔE and TS values were statistically analysed. The level of significance for all tests was 5%.

Results: Significant differences in ∆E values were recorded between the experimental groups. ∆E values were significantly higher in the 20% CP conventional at-home whitening group. TS measurements were significantly higher in the 20% CP whitening group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Conventional at-home whitening revealed significantly improved colour change when compared to the OTC-paint on gel and OTC ready-to-use gel tray whitening systems. There was a significant colour relapse in OTC systems.

Clinical relevance: The use of tested OTC systems is not recommended as they are not effective in a clear and prolonged improved shade change. Conventional at-home whitening using 20% CP showed higher whitening efficiency and colour stability. This trial was registered with a International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN23096480), Registration date: 12/04/2023.

Abstract Image

评估两种不同非处方牙齿美白系统的功效:随机对照临床试验。
目的:比较两种不同的非处方(OTC)美白系统与使用 20% 过氧化二氨的传统居家漂白的美白效率和牙齿敏感性(TS):比较两种不同的非处方(OTC)美白系统与使用20%过氧化氢的传统居家漂白的美白效率和牙齿敏感度(TS):随机对照临床试验分为三组(n = 13):(A) 使用 20% 过氧化卡巴酰胺(20% CP)的居家美白,(B) 非处方药即用型凝胶托盘,以及 (C) 非处方药涂抹凝胶。临床颜色变化值(ΔE)使用分光光度法测量,时间分别为 T0:基线;T1:美白开始后 7 天和 T2:14 天;T3:美白结束后 2 周;T4:美白结束后 6 个月。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录 TS。对 ΔE 和 TS 值进行了统计分析。所有测试的显著性水平均为 5%:结果:实验组之间的 ΔE 值存在显著差异。20% CP 传统居家美白组的 ∆E 值明显更高。20% CP 美白组的 TS 测量值明显更高(p 结论:∆E 值在 20% CP 传统居家美白组中明显更高:与 OTC 凝胶涂抹式美白系统和 OTC 即用型凝胶托盘美白系统相比,传统的居家美白可明显改善肤色变化。非处方药美白系统有明显的颜色复发现象:临床意义:不建议使用经过测试的非处方药美白系统,因为它们不能有效、持久地改善肤色。使用 20% CP 的传统居家美白方法显示出更高的美白效率和颜色稳定性。本试验已获国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN23096480),注册日期:2023 年 4 月 12 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信