Surgical Outcomes of Epidural Hematoma in Trauma Patients with Absent Pupillary Reactions: A National Trauma Data Analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nasim Ahmed, Yen-Hong Kuo, Seung Hoon Shin
{"title":"Surgical Outcomes of Epidural Hematoma in Trauma Patients with Absent Pupillary Reactions: A National Trauma Data Analysis.","authors":"Nasim Ahmed, Yen-Hong Kuo, Seung Hoon Shin","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1786535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Absent pupillary reaction occasionally heralds a poor prognosis following severe head injury. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcome of all patients who underwent acute evacuation of epidural hematoma (EDH) despite absent bilateral pupillary reaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database for the calendar years 2017 and 2018 was accessed for the study. Adult patients ≥18 years of age who sustained severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with the diagnosis of EDH and underwent evacuation of the hematoma were included in the study. The patients' characteristics, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, midline shift, and comorbidities were compared between patients who had absence of both pupillary reaction (ABPR) and those who presented with presence of both pupillary reaction (PBPR). The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching analyses were performed for the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> No significant differences were found between the ABPR and PBPR groups regarding the median age (37 years [interquartile range (IQR): 26-53] vs. 40 years [IQR: 28-55]), gender (males; 81.9 vs. 79.5%), median ISS (29 [25.5-34] vs. 27 [25-33]), GCS score (3 [3-4] vs. 3 [3-3], presence of significant midline shift (75.9 vs. 79.5%), and comorbidities. The patients who presented with ABPR had a significantly higher mortality (34.9 vs. 10.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.002). A higher number of patients were discharged to skilled nursing and rehabilitation facilities (16.7 vs. 10.8% and 46.3 vs. 41.9%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Approximately 65% of severe TBI patients survived after the evacuation of the EDH despite the absence of pupillary reaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Absent pupillary reaction occasionally heralds a poor prognosis following severe head injury. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcome of all patients who underwent acute evacuation of epidural hematoma (EDH) despite absent bilateral pupillary reaction.

Methods:  The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database for the calendar years 2017 and 2018 was accessed for the study. Adult patients ≥18 years of age who sustained severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with the diagnosis of EDH and underwent evacuation of the hematoma were included in the study. The patients' characteristics, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, midline shift, and comorbidities were compared between patients who had absence of both pupillary reaction (ABPR) and those who presented with presence of both pupillary reaction (PBPR). The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching analyses were performed for the study.

Results:  No significant differences were found between the ABPR and PBPR groups regarding the median age (37 years [interquartile range (IQR): 26-53] vs. 40 years [IQR: 28-55]), gender (males; 81.9 vs. 79.5%), median ISS (29 [25.5-34] vs. 27 [25-33]), GCS score (3 [3-4] vs. 3 [3-3], presence of significant midline shift (75.9 vs. 79.5%), and comorbidities. The patients who presented with ABPR had a significantly higher mortality (34.9 vs. 10.8%; p = 0.002). A higher number of patients were discharged to skilled nursing and rehabilitation facilities (16.7 vs. 10.8% and 46.3 vs. 41.9%, respectively; p = 0.045).

Conclusion:  Approximately 65% of severe TBI patients survived after the evacuation of the EDH despite the absence of pupillary reaction.

瞳孔反应缺失的创伤患者硬膜外血肿的手术效果:全国创伤数据分析》。
背景:瞳孔反应缺失偶尔预示着严重颅脑损伤后的不良预后。本研究旨在评估所有在双侧瞳孔反应缺失的情况下接受硬膜外血肿(EDH)急性排空术的患者的预后:研究访问了 2017 和 2018 历年的创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)数据库。研究纳入了年龄≥18岁、严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)且诊断为EDH并接受血肿清除术的成年患者。研究人员比较了双瞳孔反应缺失(ABPR)和双瞳孔反应存在(PBPR)患者的特征、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、中线移位和合并症。研究的主要结果是院内死亡率。研究进行了倾向得分匹配分析:结果:ABPR 组和 PBPR 组在中位年龄(37 岁 [四分位间距(IQR):26-53] vs. 40 岁 [四分位间距(IQR):28-55])、性别(男性;81.9 vs. 79.5%)、ISS 中位数(29 [25.5-34] vs. 27 [25-33])、GCS 评分(3 [3-4] vs. 3 [3-3])、是否存在明显的中线移位(75.9 vs. 79.5%)和合并症方面没有发现明显差异。出现 ABPR 的患者死亡率明显更高(34.9% 对 10.8%;P = 0.002)。更多患者出院后进入专业护理和康复机构(分别为16.7%对10.8%和46.3%对41.9%;P = 0.045):结论:尽管没有瞳孔反应,但约65%的严重创伤性脑损伤患者在撤离EDH后存活了下来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies. JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信