Changing terms, evolving strategies: the tailoring of supply chain management terms and its implications

Maicom Sergio Brandao, Moacir Godinho Filho
{"title":"Changing terms, evolving strategies: the tailoring of supply chain management terms and its implications","authors":"Maicom Sergio Brandao, Moacir Godinho Filho","doi":"10.1108/scm-01-2024-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to investigate the evolution of terminology in supply chain management (SCM) and its implications for the field’s strategic orientation. It also aims to understand how SCM terms adapt to interdisciplinary contexts, reflecting shifts in theoretical and practical approaches within the discipline.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study uses a systematic literature review and analyzes over 3,500 unique SCM-related terms extracted from approximately 33,000 abstracts. By using Descending Hierarchical Classification and factor analysis, the research methodologically identifies key shifts in terminology and discerns underlying patterns.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study categorizes terminological variations in SCM into three main clusters: product–agent, performance objective orientation and structure. These variations signal not only linguistic changes but also strategic shifts in SCM understanding and practice. Notably, terms such as “green,” “sustainable” and “circular” supply chains have emerged in response to evolving internal and external pressures and trends. In addition, this paper offers a nuanced understanding of these terminological adaptations, proposing a reference framework for navigating SCM’s evolving lexicon and highlighting global usage and geographical and cultural nuances in SCM discourse.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This paper presents a reference framework that complements existing SCM definitions, fostering a shared understanding of SCM variations on a global scale. This framework enhances cultural sensitivity within the field and underscores SCM’s adaptability and flexibility. These insights offer a nuanced view of SCM dynamics, benefiting researchers and practitioners alike. Beyond terminology, this study sheds light on the interplay between language and SCM strategy, providing a valuable perspective for navigating the evolving SCM landscape. The study’s scope is constrained by the analyzed abstracts. Future research could broaden this analysis to encompass more SCM literature or delve deeper into the implications of terminological changes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study offers practitioners a reference framework for navigating the evolving lexicon of SCM. This framework aids in understanding the strategic implications of terminological changes, enhancing clarity and context in both academic and practical applications.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>By acknowledging global usage and variations, the research underscores the impact of geographical and cultural nuances on SCM discourse. This global perspective enriches the understanding of SCM as a dynamic and culturally sensitive field.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research is novel in its extensive and systematic exploration of SCM terminology. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of how language evolves in tandem with strategic shifts in the field, providing a unique perspective on the interplay between terminology and strategy in SCM.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":30468,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Management Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-01-2024-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the evolution of terminology in supply chain management (SCM) and its implications for the field’s strategic orientation. It also aims to understand how SCM terms adapt to interdisciplinary contexts, reflecting shifts in theoretical and practical approaches within the discipline.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses a systematic literature review and analyzes over 3,500 unique SCM-related terms extracted from approximately 33,000 abstracts. By using Descending Hierarchical Classification and factor analysis, the research methodologically identifies key shifts in terminology and discerns underlying patterns.

Findings

This study categorizes terminological variations in SCM into three main clusters: product–agent, performance objective orientation and structure. These variations signal not only linguistic changes but also strategic shifts in SCM understanding and practice. Notably, terms such as “green,” “sustainable” and “circular” supply chains have emerged in response to evolving internal and external pressures and trends. In addition, this paper offers a nuanced understanding of these terminological adaptations, proposing a reference framework for navigating SCM’s evolving lexicon and highlighting global usage and geographical and cultural nuances in SCM discourse.

Research limitations/implications

This paper presents a reference framework that complements existing SCM definitions, fostering a shared understanding of SCM variations on a global scale. This framework enhances cultural sensitivity within the field and underscores SCM’s adaptability and flexibility. These insights offer a nuanced view of SCM dynamics, benefiting researchers and practitioners alike. Beyond terminology, this study sheds light on the interplay between language and SCM strategy, providing a valuable perspective for navigating the evolving SCM landscape. The study’s scope is constrained by the analyzed abstracts. Future research could broaden this analysis to encompass more SCM literature or delve deeper into the implications of terminological changes.

Practical implications

This study offers practitioners a reference framework for navigating the evolving lexicon of SCM. This framework aids in understanding the strategic implications of terminological changes, enhancing clarity and context in both academic and practical applications.

Social implications

By acknowledging global usage and variations, the research underscores the impact of geographical and cultural nuances on SCM discourse. This global perspective enriches the understanding of SCM as a dynamic and culturally sensitive field.

Originality/value

This research is novel in its extensive and systematic exploration of SCM terminology. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of how language evolves in tandem with strategic shifts in the field, providing a unique perspective on the interplay between terminology and strategy in SCM.

不断变化的术语,不断发展的战略:供应链管理术语的定制及其影响
目的本研究旨在探讨供应链管理(SCM)术语的演变及其对该领域战略定位的影响。本研究采用系统的文献综述方法,分析了从约 33,000 篇摘要中提取的 3,500 多个与供应链管理相关的独特术语。通过使用降序层次分类法和因子分析法,本研究从方法上确定了术语的主要变化,并发现了潜在的模式。研究结果本研究将单片机领域的术语变化分为三大类:产品-代理、绩效目标导向和结构。这些变化不仅预示着语言上的变化,也预示着供应链管理理解和实践中的战略转变。值得注意的是,"绿色"、"可持续 "和 "循环 "供应链等术语的出现是为了应对不断变化的内外部压力和趋势。此外,本文还提供了对这些术语适应性的细微理解,提出了一个参考框架,用于浏览供应链管理不断演变的词汇表,并强调了供应链管理话语中的全球用法以及地理和文化上的细微差别。该框架增强了该领域的文化敏感性,强调了单片机的适应性和灵活性。这些见解为单片机动态提供了一个细致入微的视角,使研究人员和从业人员受益匪浅。除了术语之外,本研究还揭示了语言与供应链管理战略之间的相互作用,为驾驭不断演变的供应链管理格局提供了宝贵的视角。本研究的范围受到所分析摘要的限制。未来的研究可以扩大分析范围,纳入更多的供应链管理文献,或深入探讨术语变化的影响。这一框架有助于理解术语变化的战略意义,在学术和实际应用中提高清晰度和语境。社会意义通过承认全球使用情况和差异,本研究强调了地理和文化差异对供应链管理话语的影响。这种全球视角丰富了人们对单片机这一充满活力且具有文化敏感性的领域的理解。本研究全面分析了语言如何随着该领域的战略转变而演变,为术语与战略在单片机领域的相互作用提供了一个独特的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信