Community sport, Australian sport policy, and advocacy: The views of community sport club officials

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Charles Mountifield
{"title":"Community sport, Australian sport policy, and advocacy: The views of community sport club officials","authors":"Charles Mountifield","doi":"10.1002/casp.2822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Australia, the policy priorities and processes of government and national governing bodies of sport impact how community sport organizations operate. This study explored the views of community sport club (CSC) officials (<i>n</i> = 53) in the Illawarra region in New South Wales, where there is a disparity in impact compared with their better-resourced urban counterparts concerning sustainability, policy, and advocacy matters. Participants were surveyed for their views about the typically top-down policy processes, inter-organizational relationships, and advocacy for community sport. CSC officials participated in an online survey to assess opinions on resource issues and policy processes. The findings demonstrated that community sport is challenging to sustain and that CSC officials have little influence on policy. The outcome points to an appetite for advocacy from CSC officials in policy creation. Further, the Advocacy Coalition Framework is proffered as a platform for evaluating the viability of advocacy within community sport.</p>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/casp.2822","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.2822","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Australia, the policy priorities and processes of government and national governing bodies of sport impact how community sport organizations operate. This study explored the views of community sport club (CSC) officials (n = 53) in the Illawarra region in New South Wales, where there is a disparity in impact compared with their better-resourced urban counterparts concerning sustainability, policy, and advocacy matters. Participants were surveyed for their views about the typically top-down policy processes, inter-organizational relationships, and advocacy for community sport. CSC officials participated in an online survey to assess opinions on resource issues and policy processes. The findings demonstrated that community sport is challenging to sustain and that CSC officials have little influence on policy. The outcome points to an appetite for advocacy from CSC officials in policy creation. Further, the Advocacy Coalition Framework is proffered as a platform for evaluating the viability of advocacy within community sport.

Abstract Image

社区体育、澳大利亚体育政策和宣传:社区体育俱乐部官员的观点
在澳大利亚,政府和国家体育管理机构的政策重点和程序影响着社区体育组织的运作方式。本研究探讨了新南威尔士伊拉瓦拉地区社区体育俱乐部(CSC)官员(53 人)的观点,与资源较好的城市社区体育俱乐部相比,这些社区体育俱乐部在可持续发展、政策和宣传方面的影响力存在差异。我们对参与者进行了调查,以了解他们对社区体育典型的自上而下的政策流程、组织间关系和宣传的看法。社区体育中心的官员参与了一项在线调查,以评估对资源问题和政策程序的看法。调查结果表明,社区体育的持续发展具有挑战性,社区体育中心官员对政策的影响力很小。调查结果表明,社区体育中心官员希望在政策制定过程中进行宣传。此外,还提出了 "宣传联盟框架",作为评估社区体育宣传可行性的平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信