Tablet-based Augmented reality and 3D printed templates in fully guided Microtia Reconstruction: a clinical workflow.

IF 3.2 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Alberto Díez-Montiel, Alicia Pose-Díez-de-la-Lastra, Alba González-Álvarez, José I Salmerón, Javier Pascau, Santiago Ochandiano
{"title":"Tablet-based Augmented reality and 3D printed templates in fully guided Microtia Reconstruction: a clinical workflow.","authors":"Alberto Díez-Montiel, Alicia Pose-Díez-de-la-Lastra, Alba González-Álvarez, José I Salmerón, Javier Pascau, Santiago Ochandiano","doi":"10.1186/s41205-024-00213-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microtia is a congenital malformation of the auricle that affects approximately 4 of every 10,000 live newborns. Radiographic film paper is traditionally employed to bidimensionally trace the structures of the contralateral healthy ear in a quasi-artistic manner. Anatomical points provide linear and angular measurements. However, this technique proves time-consuming, subjectivity-rich, and greatly dependent on surgeon expertise. Hence, it's susceptible to shape errors and misplacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present an innovative clinical workflow that combines 3D printing and augmented reality (AR) to increase objectivity and reproducibility of these procedures. Specifically, we introduce patient-specific 3D cutting templates and remodeling molds to carve and construct the cartilaginous framework that will conform the new ear. Moreover, we developed an in-house AR application compatible with any commercial Android tablet. It precisely guides the positioning of the new ear during surgery, ensuring symmetrical alignment with the healthy one and avoiding time-consuming intraoperative linear or angular measurements. Our solution was evaluated in one case, first with controlled experiments in a simulation scenario and finally during surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the ears placed in the simulation scenario had a mean absolute deviation of 2.2 ± 1.7 mm with respect to the reference plan. During the surgical intervention, the reconstructed ear was 3.1 mm longer and 1.3 mm wider with respect to the ideal plan and had a positioning error of 2.7 ± 2.4 mm relative to the contralateral side. Note that in this case, additional morphometric variations were induced from inflammation and other issues intended to be addressed in a subsequent stage of surgery, which are independent of our proposed solution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this work we propose an innovative workflow that combines 3D printing and AR to improve ear reconstruction and positioning in microtia correction procedures. Our implementation in the surgical workflow showed good accuracy, empowering surgeons to attain consistent and objective outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11140883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-024-00213-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Microtia is a congenital malformation of the auricle that affects approximately 4 of every 10,000 live newborns. Radiographic film paper is traditionally employed to bidimensionally trace the structures of the contralateral healthy ear in a quasi-artistic manner. Anatomical points provide linear and angular measurements. However, this technique proves time-consuming, subjectivity-rich, and greatly dependent on surgeon expertise. Hence, it's susceptible to shape errors and misplacement.

Methods: We present an innovative clinical workflow that combines 3D printing and augmented reality (AR) to increase objectivity and reproducibility of these procedures. Specifically, we introduce patient-specific 3D cutting templates and remodeling molds to carve and construct the cartilaginous framework that will conform the new ear. Moreover, we developed an in-house AR application compatible with any commercial Android tablet. It precisely guides the positioning of the new ear during surgery, ensuring symmetrical alignment with the healthy one and avoiding time-consuming intraoperative linear or angular measurements. Our solution was evaluated in one case, first with controlled experiments in a simulation scenario and finally during surgery.

Results: Overall, the ears placed in the simulation scenario had a mean absolute deviation of 2.2 ± 1.7 mm with respect to the reference plan. During the surgical intervention, the reconstructed ear was 3.1 mm longer and 1.3 mm wider with respect to the ideal plan and had a positioning error of 2.7 ± 2.4 mm relative to the contralateral side. Note that in this case, additional morphometric variations were induced from inflammation and other issues intended to be addressed in a subsequent stage of surgery, which are independent of our proposed solution.

Conclusions: In this work we propose an innovative workflow that combines 3D printing and AR to improve ear reconstruction and positioning in microtia correction procedures. Our implementation in the surgical workflow showed good accuracy, empowering surgeons to attain consistent and objective outcomes.

基于平板电脑的增强现实技术和三维打印模板在全引导小耳畸形重建中的应用:临床工作流程。
背景:小耳症是一种先天性耳廓畸形,每 10,000 名活产新生儿中约有 4 人患病。传统的方法是使用射线胶片纸,以准艺术的方式对对侧健康耳朵的结构进行二维描记。解剖点可提供线性和角度测量值。然而,这种技术耗时长、主观性强,而且在很大程度上依赖于外科医生的专业知识。因此,它很容易出现形状误差和错位:我们介绍了一种创新的临床工作流程,该流程结合了 3D 打印和增强现实技术 (AR),以提高这些手术的客观性和可重复性。具体来说,我们引入了患者专用的三维切割模板和重塑模具,以雕刻和构建软骨框架,从而塑造新耳朵。此外,我们还开发了一款内部 AR 应用程序,可与任何商用安卓平板电脑兼容。它能在手术过程中精确引导新耳朵的定位,确保与健康耳朵对称对齐,避免了耗时的术中线性或角度测量。我们在一个病例中对解决方案进行了评估,首先在模拟场景中进行了受控实验,最后在手术过程中进行了评估:总的来说,在模拟场景中放置的耳朵与参考平面图的平均绝对偏差为 2.2 ± 1.7 毫米。在手术过程中,重建的耳朵相对于理想方案长了 3.1 毫米,宽了 1.3 毫米,相对于对侧的定位误差为 2.7 ± 2.4 毫米。请注意,在这个病例中,炎症和其他问题引起了额外的形态测量变化,这些问题将在后续的手术阶段解决,与我们提出的解决方案无关:在这项工作中,我们提出了一种结合 3D 打印和 AR 的创新工作流程,以改善小耳畸形矫正手术中的耳朵重建和定位。我们在手术工作流程中的实施显示出良好的准确性,使外科医生能够获得一致、客观的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信