Automating aortic cross-sectional measurement of 3D aorta models.

IF 1.9 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.034503
Matthew Bramlet, Salman Mohamadi, Jayishnu Srinivas, Tehan Dassanayaka, Tafara Okammor, Mark Shadden, Bradley P Sutton
{"title":"Automating aortic cross-sectional measurement of 3D aorta models.","authors":"Matthew Bramlet, Salman Mohamadi, Jayishnu Srinivas, Tehan Dassanayaka, Tafara Okammor, Mark Shadden, Bradley P Sutton","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.034503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aortic dissection carries a mortality as high as 50%, but surgical palliation is also fraught with morbidity risks of stroke or paralysis. As such, a significant focus of medical decision making is on longitudinal aortic diameters. We hypothesize that three-dimensional (3D) modeling affords a more efficient methodology toward automated longitudinal aortic measurement. The first step is to automate the measurement of manually segmented 3D models of the aorta. We developed and validated an algorithm to analyze a 3D segmented aorta and output the maximum dimension of minimum cross-sectional areas in a stepwise progression from the diaphragm to the aortic root. Accordingly, the goal is to assess the diagnostic validity of the 3D modeling measurement as a substitute for existing 2D measurements.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>From January 2021 to June 2022, 66 3D non-contrast steady-state free precession magnetic resonance images of aortic pathology with clinical aortic measurements were identified; 3D aorta models were manually segmented. A novel mathematical algorithm was applied to each model to generate maximal aortic diameters from the diaphragm to the root, which were then correlated to clinical measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a 76% success rate, we analyzed the resulting 50 3D aortic models utilizing the automated measurement tool. There was an excellent correlation between the automated measurement and the clinical measurement. The intra-class correlation coefficient and <math><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></math>-value for each of the nine measured locations of the aorta were as follows: sinus of valsalva, 0.99, <math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math>; sino-tubular junction, 0.89, <math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math>; ascending aorta, 0.97, <math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math>; brachiocephalic artery, 0.96, <math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math>; transverse segment 1, 0.89, <math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math>; transverse segment 2, 0.93, <math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math>; isthmus region, 0.92, <math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math>; descending aorta, 0.96, <math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math>; and aorta at diaphragm, 0.3, <math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automating diagnostic measurements that appease clinical confidence is a critical first step in a fully automated process. This tool demonstrates excellent correlation between measurements derived from manually segmented 3D models and the clinical measurements, laying the foundation for transitioning analytic methodologies from 2D to 3D.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"11 3","pages":"034503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11135202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.034503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Aortic dissection carries a mortality as high as 50%, but surgical palliation is also fraught with morbidity risks of stroke or paralysis. As such, a significant focus of medical decision making is on longitudinal aortic diameters. We hypothesize that three-dimensional (3D) modeling affords a more efficient methodology toward automated longitudinal aortic measurement. The first step is to automate the measurement of manually segmented 3D models of the aorta. We developed and validated an algorithm to analyze a 3D segmented aorta and output the maximum dimension of minimum cross-sectional areas in a stepwise progression from the diaphragm to the aortic root. Accordingly, the goal is to assess the diagnostic validity of the 3D modeling measurement as a substitute for existing 2D measurements.

Approach: From January 2021 to June 2022, 66 3D non-contrast steady-state free precession magnetic resonance images of aortic pathology with clinical aortic measurements were identified; 3D aorta models were manually segmented. A novel mathematical algorithm was applied to each model to generate maximal aortic diameters from the diaphragm to the root, which were then correlated to clinical measurements.

Results: With a 76% success rate, we analyzed the resulting 50 3D aortic models utilizing the automated measurement tool. There was an excellent correlation between the automated measurement and the clinical measurement. The intra-class correlation coefficient and p-value for each of the nine measured locations of the aorta were as follows: sinus of valsalva, 0.99, <0.001; sino-tubular junction, 0.89, <0.001; ascending aorta, 0.97, <0.001; brachiocephalic artery, 0.96, <0.001; transverse segment 1, 0.89, <0.001; transverse segment 2, 0.93, <0.001; isthmus region, 0.92, <0.001; descending aorta, 0.96, <0.001; and aorta at diaphragm, 0.3, <0.001.

Conclusions: Automating diagnostic measurements that appease clinical confidence is a critical first step in a fully automated process. This tool demonstrates excellent correlation between measurements derived from manually segmented 3D models and the clinical measurements, laying the foundation for transitioning analytic methodologies from 2D to 3D.

自动测量三维主动脉模型的主动脉横截面。
目的:主动脉夹层的死亡率高达 50%,但手术姑息治疗也存在中风或瘫痪的发病风险。因此,医疗决策的一个重要焦点是主动脉纵向直径。我们假设三维建模能提供一种更有效的方法来实现主动脉纵向直径的自动测量。第一步是自动测量人工分割的主动脉三维模型。我们开发并验证了一种算法,用于分析三维分割的主动脉,并从膈肌到主动脉根部逐步输出最小横截面积的最大尺寸。因此,我们的目标是评估三维建模测量作为现有二维测量替代品的诊断有效性:方法:从 2021 年 1 月到 2022 年 6 月,确定了 66 幅主动脉病变的三维非对比稳态自由前序磁共振图像,并进行了临床主动脉测量;手动分割了三维主动脉模型。对每个模型采用一种新颖的数学算法,生成从膈肌到根部的主动脉最大直径,然后将其与临床测量结果进行关联:我们利用自动测量工具分析了生成的 50 个三维主动脉模型,成功率高达 76%。自动测量结果与临床测量结果之间存在极好的相关性。主动脉九个测量位置的类内相关系数和 p 值如下:瓣膜窦,0.99,0.001;窦-管交界处,0.89,0.001;升主动脉,0.97,0.001;肱动脉,0.96,0.001;横断段 1,0.89,0.001;横断段 2,0.93,0.001;峡区,0.92,0.001;降主动脉,0.96,0.001;膈肌处主动脉,0.3,0.001.结论:自动进行诊断测量以满足临床信心是全自动流程中至关重要的第一步。该工具展示了从手动分割的三维模型中得出的测量结果与临床测量结果之间的出色相关性,为将分析方法从二维过渡到三维奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging
Journal of Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信