Understanding Refugees Health Experiences in Host Countries: Three Theoretical Perspectives.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Clinical Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1177/10547738241253655
Yana D Gepshtein, Jung-Ah Lee, Dawn T Bounds, Candace W Burton
{"title":"Understanding Refugees Health Experiences in Host Countries: Three Theoretical Perspectives.","authors":"Yana D Gepshtein, Jung-Ah Lee, Dawn T Bounds, Candace W Burton","doi":"10.1177/10547738241253655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare providers working with forcefully displaced populations often have limited knowledge and skills regarding the care of this population. The reasons are twofold. First, most of the research on refugee health does not consider refugees' adaptive skills, diversity of experiences, and daily life context. Second, healthcare providers' knowledge of how the sociopolitical environment shapes health research and practice in the context of refugee care is often limited. This work aims to specify gaps in refugee healthcare and research by applying a relational approach to three theoretical frameworks. The relational approach supports a pragmatic, in-depth understanding of healthcare practices by shifting the focus of the inquiry from description of social structures toward exploration of processes and relations that propagate and sustain such structures. The focus is on the threefold interaction between refugees, healthcare providers, and healthcare institutions. The three theoretical frameworks are as follows: First, using concepts from the Theory of Practice by Bourdieu, we examine how gaps in care can result from a mismatch between the dispositions and skills that refugees develop through life experience and the cultural-professional practices of healthcare providers in host countries. Second, the Cultural Determinants of Help Seeking by Saint Arnault is applied to posit that gaps in care can result from differences in the meanings that healthcare providers and refugees assign to their interactions. Finally, we use the concept of Othering as described in nursing by Canales to explain how power dynamics inherent in the interaction between refugees and healthcare systems can affect refugee healthcare and research. This relational approach helps to elucidate some of the culture-bound mechanisms of health maintenance and help-seeking and brings attention to the sociopolitical context that shapes the way we care to refugees.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738241253655","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare providers working with forcefully displaced populations often have limited knowledge and skills regarding the care of this population. The reasons are twofold. First, most of the research on refugee health does not consider refugees' adaptive skills, diversity of experiences, and daily life context. Second, healthcare providers' knowledge of how the sociopolitical environment shapes health research and practice in the context of refugee care is often limited. This work aims to specify gaps in refugee healthcare and research by applying a relational approach to three theoretical frameworks. The relational approach supports a pragmatic, in-depth understanding of healthcare practices by shifting the focus of the inquiry from description of social structures toward exploration of processes and relations that propagate and sustain such structures. The focus is on the threefold interaction between refugees, healthcare providers, and healthcare institutions. The three theoretical frameworks are as follows: First, using concepts from the Theory of Practice by Bourdieu, we examine how gaps in care can result from a mismatch between the dispositions and skills that refugees develop through life experience and the cultural-professional practices of healthcare providers in host countries. Second, the Cultural Determinants of Help Seeking by Saint Arnault is applied to posit that gaps in care can result from differences in the meanings that healthcare providers and refugees assign to their interactions. Finally, we use the concept of Othering as described in nursing by Canales to explain how power dynamics inherent in the interaction between refugees and healthcare systems can affect refugee healthcare and research. This relational approach helps to elucidate some of the culture-bound mechanisms of health maintenance and help-seeking and brings attention to the sociopolitical context that shapes the way we care to refugees.

了解难民在东道国的健康经历:三种理论视角。
为被迫流离失所者提供服务的医疗服务提供者往往对这类人群的护理知识和技能掌握有限。原因有两个方面。首先,大多数关于难民健康的研究都没有考虑到难民的适应能力、经历的多样性以及日常生活背景。其次,医疗服务提供者对社会政治环境如何影响难民护理方面的健康研究和实践的了解往往有限。这项工作旨在通过在三个理论框架中应用关系方法,明确难民医疗保健和研究中存在的差距。关系法通过将研究重点从描述社会结构转向探索传播和维持这种结构的过程和关系,支持对医疗保健实践进行务实、深入的理解。重点是难民、医疗服务提供者和医疗机构之间的三重互动。三个理论框架如下:首先,利用布迪厄(Bourdieu)的《实践理论》(Theory of Practice)中的概念,我们研究了难民在生活经历中形成的处置方式和技能与东道国医疗服务提供者的文化-专业实践之间的不匹配如何导致医疗差距。其次,我们运用圣阿尔诺(Saint Arnault)的《寻求帮助的文化决定因素》(Cultural Determinants of Help Seeking)理论,假设医疗服务提供者与难民之间的互动意义不同,可能导致医疗服务的差距。最后,我们使用卡纳莱斯在护理学中描述的 "他者化 "概念来解释难民与医疗保健系统之间互动中固有的权力动态如何影响难民医疗保健和研究。这种关系方法有助于阐明一些与文化相关的健康维护和寻求帮助的机制,并使人们注意到影响我们对难民的护理方式的社会政治背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信