Detection and quantitation of venous leg edema with the edema ruler and ultrasound.

Phlebology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1177/02683555241258283
Maysen E Calzon, John Blebea, Christopher Pittman
{"title":"Detection and quantitation of venous leg edema with the edema ruler and ultrasound.","authors":"Maysen E Calzon, John Blebea, Christopher Pittman","doi":"10.1177/02683555241258283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Lower extremity edema is characteristic of C3 chronic venous disease. We developed a new clinical and duplex ultrasound (DUS) methodology for the detection and quantification of leg edema and prospectively evaluated its usefulness. <b>Methods:</b> Forty-seven venous patients (94 legs) were evaluated for ankle edema using an Edema Ruler<sup>TM</sup> and DUS using a modified Suehiro grading scale. <b>Results:</b> Interobserver reliability for the use of the Edema Ruler<sup>TM</sup> was 0.985 (<i>p</i> < .001) and 0.883 (<i>p</i> < .001) for the Modified Suehiro Grade. The Edema Ruler<sup>TM</sup> had stronger significant correlations with Edema rVCSS (0.842; <i>p</i> < .001) compared to DUS: (0.474;<i>p</i> < .001) with Edema rVCSS. There were significant differences between the edema pitting depth in CEAP classification of C1 and C2 compared to C3, C4a, and C4c. DUS analysis only had significant differences between CEAP classification C2 and C4a. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Edema Ruler<sup>TM</sup> provides a quantitative measurement of lower extremity edema with high reliability which can be easily integrated into clinical practice. While both methods had good inter-observer reliability, the Edema Ruler<sup>TM</sup> had stronger correlations to Edema rVCSS and showed significant differences in pitting depths between lower CEAP scores (C1-2) compared to higher CEAP scores (C3-4c).</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"557-563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241258283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Lower extremity edema is characteristic of C3 chronic venous disease. We developed a new clinical and duplex ultrasound (DUS) methodology for the detection and quantification of leg edema and prospectively evaluated its usefulness. Methods: Forty-seven venous patients (94 legs) were evaluated for ankle edema using an Edema RulerTM and DUS using a modified Suehiro grading scale. Results: Interobserver reliability for the use of the Edema RulerTM was 0.985 (p < .001) and 0.883 (p < .001) for the Modified Suehiro Grade. The Edema RulerTM had stronger significant correlations with Edema rVCSS (0.842; p < .001) compared to DUS: (0.474;p < .001) with Edema rVCSS. There were significant differences between the edema pitting depth in CEAP classification of C1 and C2 compared to C3, C4a, and C4c. DUS analysis only had significant differences between CEAP classification C2 and C4a. Conclusions: The Edema RulerTM provides a quantitative measurement of lower extremity edema with high reliability which can be easily integrated into clinical practice. While both methods had good inter-observer reliability, the Edema RulerTM had stronger correlations to Edema rVCSS and showed significant differences in pitting depths between lower CEAP scores (C1-2) compared to higher CEAP scores (C3-4c).

利用水肿尺和超声波检测和量化腿部静脉水肿。
目的:下肢水肿是 C3 慢性静脉疾病的特征:下肢水肿是 C3 慢性静脉疾病的特征。我们开发了一种新的临床和双工超声(DUS)方法来检测和量化腿部水肿,并对其实用性进行了前瞻性评估。方法使用水肿尺(Edema RulerTM)和 DUS(使用改良的 Suehiro 分级表)对 47 名静脉患者(94 条腿)的踝关节水肿进行评估。结果显示使用水肿标尺 TM 的观察者间可靠性为 0.985 (p < .001),使用改良 Suehiro 分级的观察者间可靠性为 0.883 (p < .001)。与 DUS(0.474;p < .001)和水肿 rVCSS(0.842;p < .001)相比,水肿尺 TM 与水肿 rVCSS 具有更强的显著相关性。与 C3、C4a 和 C4c 相比,CEAP 分级中 C1 和 C2 的水肿点深度存在明显差异。DUS 分析仅在 CEAP 分级 C2 和 C4a 之间存在显著差异。结论:Edema RulerTM 可对下肢水肿进行定量测量,可靠性高,可轻松应用于临床实践。虽然两种方法在观察者之间都具有良好的可靠性,但水肿标尺 TM 与水肿 rVCSS 的相关性更强,而且 CEAP 较低评分(C1-2)与 CEAP 较高评分(C3-4c)之间的点状深度差异显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信