Comparison of Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Tissue Sampling for High-Throughput Proteomic Analysis and Cancer Biomarker Detection.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY
Pathobiology Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1159/000539478
Hye Eun Park, Dohyun Han, Jae Seok Lee, Ilias P Nikas, Hyeyoon Kim, Sohyeon Yang, Hyebin Lee, Han Suk Ryu
{"title":"Comparison of Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Tissue Sampling for High-Throughput Proteomic Analysis and Cancer Biomarker Detection.","authors":"Hye Eun Park, Dohyun Han, Jae Seok Lee, Ilias P Nikas, Hyeyoon Kim, Sohyeon Yang, Hyebin Lee, Han Suk Ryu","doi":"10.1159/000539478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens are widely utilized for the diagnosis and molecular testing of various cancers. We performed a comparative proteomic analysis of three different sample types, including breast FNAC, core needle biopsy (CNB), and surgical resection tissues. Our goal was to evaluate the suitability of FNAC for in-depth proteomic analysis and for identifying potential therapeutic biomarkers in breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>High-throughput proteomic analysis was conducted on matched FNAC, CNB, and surgical resection tissue samples obtained from breast cancer patients. The protein identification, including currently established or promising therapeutic targets, was compared among the three different sample types. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was also performed on all matched samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to tissue samples, FNAC testing revealed a comparable number of proteins (7,179 in FNAC; 7,196 in CNB; and 7,190 in resection samples). Around 85% of proteins were mutually identified in all sample types. FNAC, along with CNB, showed a positive correlation between the number of enrolled tumor cells and identified proteins. In the GO analysis, the FNAC samples demonstrated a higher number of genes for each pathway and GO terms than tissue samples. CCND1, CDK6, HER2, and IGF1R were found in higher quantities in the FNAC compared to tissue samples, while TUBB2A was only detected in the former.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNAC is suitable for high-throughput proteomic analysis, in addition to an emerging source that could be used to identify and quantify novel cancer biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19805,"journal":{"name":"Pathobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens are widely utilized for the diagnosis and molecular testing of various cancers. We performed a comparative proteomic analysis of three different sample types, including breast FNAC, core needle biopsy (CNB), and surgical resection tissues. Our goal was to evaluate the suitability of FNAC for in-depth proteomic analysis and for identifying potential therapeutic biomarkers in breast cancer.

Methods: High-throughput proteomic analysis was conducted on matched FNAC, CNB, and surgical resection tissue samples obtained from breast cancer patients. The protein identification, including currently established or promising therapeutic targets, was compared among the three different sample types. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was also performed on all matched samples.

Results: Compared to tissue samples, FNAC testing revealed a comparable number of proteins (7,179 in FNAC; 7,196 in CNB; and 7,190 in resection samples). Around 85% of proteins were mutually identified in all sample types. FNAC, along with CNB, showed a positive correlation between the number of enrolled tumor cells and identified proteins. In the GO analysis, the FNAC samples demonstrated a higher number of genes for each pathway and GO terms than tissue samples. CCND1, CDK6, HER2, and IGF1R were found in higher quantities in the FNAC compared to tissue samples, while TUBB2A was only detected in the former.

Conclusion: FNAC is suitable for high-throughput proteomic analysis, in addition to an emerging source that could be used to identify and quantify novel cancer biomarkers.

乳腺细针穿刺细胞学与组织取样在高通量蛋白质组分析和癌症生物标记物检测中的应用比较。
背景:细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)标本被广泛用于各种癌症的诊断和分子检测。我们对三种不同类型的样本进行了蛋白质组学比较分析,包括乳腺细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)、核心针活检(CNB)和手术切除组织。我们的目标是评估 FNAC 是否适合进行深入的蛋白质组分析,以及是否适合鉴定乳腺癌的潜在治疗生物标记物。方法:我们对从乳腺癌患者身上获得的匹配的 FNAC、CNB 和手术切除组织样本进行了高通量蛋白质组分析。方法:对乳腺癌患者的 FNAC、CNB 和手术切除组织样本进行了高通量蛋白质组分析,比较了三种不同样本的蛋白质鉴定结果,包括目前已确定的或有希望的治疗靶点。此外,还对所有匹配样本进行了基因本体(GO)富集分析:结果:与组织样本相比,FNAC 检测发现的蛋白质数量相当(FNAC 为 7179 个;CNB 为 7196 个;切除样本为 7190 个)。在所有类型的样本中,约有 85% 的蛋白质可以相互识别。FNAC和CNB样本中登记的肿瘤细胞数量与鉴定出的蛋白质数量呈正相关。在 GO 分析中,与组织样本相比,FNAC 样本显示出更多的各通路基因和 GO 术语。与组织样本相比,FNAC样本中发现的CCND1、CDK6、HER2和IGF1R数量更多,而TUBB2A仅在前者中被检测到:结论:FNAC适合进行高通量蛋白质组分析,也是一种可用于鉴定和量化新型癌症生物标记物的新兴来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathobiology
Pathobiology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Pathobiology'' offers a valuable platform for the publication of high-quality original research into the mechanisms underlying human disease. Aiming to serve as a bridge between basic biomedical research and clinical medicine, the journal welcomes articles from scientific areas such as pathology, oncology, anatomy, virology, internal medicine, surgery, cell and molecular biology, and immunology. Published bimonthly, ''Pathobiology'' features original research papers and reviews on translational research. The journal offers the possibility to publish proceedings of meetings dedicated to one particular topic.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信