Sources and Prevalence of Cyclospora cayetanensis in Southeastern U.S. Growing Environments

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Amy M. Kahler , Jessica Hofstetter , Michael Arrowood , Anna Peterson , David Jacobson , Joel Barratt , Andre Luiz Biscaia Ribeiro da Silva , Camila Rodrigues , Mia C. Mattioli
{"title":"Sources and Prevalence of Cyclospora cayetanensis in Southeastern U.S. Growing Environments","authors":"Amy M. Kahler ,&nbsp;Jessica Hofstetter ,&nbsp;Michael Arrowood ,&nbsp;Anna Peterson ,&nbsp;David Jacobson ,&nbsp;Joel Barratt ,&nbsp;Andre Luiz Biscaia Ribeiro da Silva ,&nbsp;Camila Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Mia C. Mattioli","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent cyclosporiasis outbreaks associated with fresh produce grown in the United States highlight the need to better understand <em>Cyclospora cayetanensis</em> prevalence in U.S. agricultural environments. In this study, <em>C. cayetanensis</em> occurrence was assessed in municipal wastewater sludge, on-farm portable toilets, irrigation pond water, and spent packing house dump tank water in a Southeastern Georgia growing region over two years. Detection of the <em>C. cayetanensis</em> 18S rRNA qPCR gene target in pond samples was 0%, 28%, and 42% (<em>N</em> = 217) depending on the detection definition used, and ≤1% in dump tank samples (<em>N</em> = 46). However, no qPCR detections were confirmed by sequencing, suggesting false detection occurred due to cross-reactions. <em>C. cayetanensis</em> qPCR detections were confirmed in 9% of wastewater sludge samples (<em>N</em> = 76). The human-specific fecal markers HF183 and crAssphage were detected in 33% and 6% of pond samples, respectively, and 4% and 0% of dump tank samples, respectively. Despite community <em>Cyclospora</em> shedding and evidence of human fecal contamination in irrigation water, there was no correlation between <em>C. cayetanensis</em> and HF183 qPCR detections, further supporting that 18S gene target qPCR amplifications were due to cross−reactions. When evaluating <em>C. cayetanensis</em> qPCR environmental detection data, the impact of assay specificity and detection criteria should be considered. Moreover, additional sequence-based testing may be needed to appropriately interpret <em>Cyclospora</em> qPCR environmental data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000930/pdfft?md5=e4aa66024a31dbe283a9daa18395bc5a&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24000930-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent cyclosporiasis outbreaks associated with fresh produce grown in the United States highlight the need to better understand Cyclospora cayetanensis prevalence in U.S. agricultural environments. In this study, C. cayetanensis occurrence was assessed in municipal wastewater sludge, on-farm portable toilets, irrigation pond water, and spent packing house dump tank water in a Southeastern Georgia growing region over two years. Detection of the C. cayetanensis 18S rRNA qPCR gene target in pond samples was 0%, 28%, and 42% (N = 217) depending on the detection definition used, and ≤1% in dump tank samples (N = 46). However, no qPCR detections were confirmed by sequencing, suggesting false detection occurred due to cross-reactions. C. cayetanensis qPCR detections were confirmed in 9% of wastewater sludge samples (N = 76). The human-specific fecal markers HF183 and crAssphage were detected in 33% and 6% of pond samples, respectively, and 4% and 0% of dump tank samples, respectively. Despite community Cyclospora shedding and evidence of human fecal contamination in irrigation water, there was no correlation between C. cayetanensis and HF183 qPCR detections, further supporting that 18S gene target qPCR amplifications were due to cross−reactions. When evaluating C. cayetanensis qPCR environmental detection data, the impact of assay specificity and detection criteria should be considered. Moreover, additional sequence-based testing may be needed to appropriately interpret Cyclospora qPCR environmental data.

美国东南部种植环境中卡耶坦环孢子虫的来源和流行情况。
最近在美国爆发的与新鲜农产品有关的环孢子虫病疫情突出表明,有必要更好地了解 C. cayetanensis 在美国农业环境中的流行情况。在这项研究中,对佐治亚州东南部种植区两年来的市政废水污泥、农场便携式厕所、灌溉池水和包装厂废水处理池水中 C. cayetanensis 的发生情况进行了评估。根据所使用的检测定义,池塘样本中 C. cayetanensis 18S rRNA qPCR 基因目标的检测率分别为 0%、28% 和 42%(样本数=217),垃圾池样本中的检测率低于 1%(样本数=46)。然而,没有 qPCR 检测结果通过测序得到确认,这表明由于交叉反应导致了错误检测。在 9% 的废水污泥样本(样本数=76)中,qPCR 检测结果得到了证实。在 33% 和 6% 的池塘样本中分别检测到人类特异性粪便标记物 HF183 和 crAssphage,在 4% 和 0% 的垃圾池样本中分别检测到人类特异性粪便标记物 HF183 和 crAssphage。尽管灌溉水中存在群体环孢子虫脱落和人类粪便污染的证据,但 C. cayetanensis 和 HF183 qPCR 检测结果之间没有相关性,这进一步证明 18S 基因目标 qPCR 扩增是由于交叉反应引起的。在评估 C. cayetanensis qPCR 环境检测数据时,应考虑检测特异性和检测标准的影响。此外,可能还需要进行更多基于序列的检测,以适当解释环孢子虫 qPCR 环境数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信