Clinical characteristics of recurrent non-arteritic retinal artery occlusion.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Hyeong Min Kim, Se Joon Woo
{"title":"Clinical characteristics of recurrent non-arteritic retinal artery occlusion.","authors":"Hyeong Min Kim, Se Joon Woo","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the recurrent non-arteritic retinal artery occlusion (RAO) in the same or opposite eye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the RAO registry at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and included patients with recurrent RAO in the present study. Ophthalmic and systemic features were analysed to identify risk factors and visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 850 patients in the non-arteritic RAO cohort, 11 (1.3%) experienced a second RAO recurrence, either in the same (5 patients; 0.6%) or opposite (6 patients; 0.7%) eye. The same eye group experienced an earlier recurrence (1-2 months, median 1 month) than the opposite eye group, where the time to recurrence was notably longer (8-66 months, median 22 months). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the same eye group decreased after the recurrence of RAO. In the same eye group, initial BCVA ranged from 20/200 to counting fingers (CF), while BCVA during RAO recurrence ranged from CF to hand motion. When RAO recurred in the opposite eye, the reduction in visual acuity was less severe than the reduction of the initial episode: initial episode ranged from 20/400 to light perception and recurrent episode ranged from 20/25 to 20/400. Patients exhibited varying degrees of carotid (81.8%) and cerebral (9.1%) artery occlusions. Additionally, one patient in each group (total 2 patients, 18.2%) experienced a stroke 6 months after RAO recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since the RAO recurrences could lead to devastating visual impairment, it is essential to emphasise the importance of risk factor screening to patients while collaborating with neurologists and cardiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11138310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the recurrent non-arteritic retinal artery occlusion (RAO) in the same or opposite eye.

Methods: We searched the RAO registry at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and included patients with recurrent RAO in the present study. Ophthalmic and systemic features were analysed to identify risk factors and visual outcomes.

Results: Of the 850 patients in the non-arteritic RAO cohort, 11 (1.3%) experienced a second RAO recurrence, either in the same (5 patients; 0.6%) or opposite (6 patients; 0.7%) eye. The same eye group experienced an earlier recurrence (1-2 months, median 1 month) than the opposite eye group, where the time to recurrence was notably longer (8-66 months, median 22 months). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the same eye group decreased after the recurrence of RAO. In the same eye group, initial BCVA ranged from 20/200 to counting fingers (CF), while BCVA during RAO recurrence ranged from CF to hand motion. When RAO recurred in the opposite eye, the reduction in visual acuity was less severe than the reduction of the initial episode: initial episode ranged from 20/400 to light perception and recurrent episode ranged from 20/25 to 20/400. Patients exhibited varying degrees of carotid (81.8%) and cerebral (9.1%) artery occlusions. Additionally, one patient in each group (total 2 patients, 18.2%) experienced a stroke 6 months after RAO recurrence.

Conclusions: Since the RAO recurrences could lead to devastating visual impairment, it is essential to emphasise the importance of risk factor screening to patients while collaborating with neurologists and cardiologists.

复发性非动脉炎性视网膜动脉闭塞的临床特征。
目的:研究同眼或对眼复发性非动脉性视网膜动脉闭塞(RAO):调查同眼或对眼复发性非动脉性视网膜动脉闭塞症(RAO):方法:我们搜索了首尔大学盆唐医院的RAO登记资料,并将复发性RAO患者纳入本研究。分析了眼部和全身特征,以确定风险因素和视觉结果:结果:在非动脉炎型 RAO 的 850 名患者中,有 11 人(1.3%)再次复发 RAO,复发部位为同眼(5 人,0.6%)或对眼(6 人,0.7%)。同眼组的复发时间(1-2个月,中位数为1个月)早于对眼组,后者的复发时间明显更长(8-66个月,中位数为22个月)。RAO 复发后,同眼组的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)下降。在同眼组中,最初的最佳矫正视力从 20/200 到数指(CF)不等,而 RAO 复发时的最佳矫正视力从 CF 到手部运动不等。当 RAO 在对眼复发时,视力下降的程度不如初次发作时严重:初次发作的视力范围从 20/400 到光感,复发的视力范围从 20/25 到 20/400。患者表现出不同程度的颈动脉(81.8%)和脑动脉(9.1%)闭塞。此外,在 RAO 复发 6 个月后,每组均有一名患者(共 2 名患者,占 18.2%)发生中风:由于RAO复发可能导致严重的视力损伤,因此在与神经科和心脏病专家合作的同时,必须强调对患者进行风险因素筛查的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信