Barriers and Facilitators of Extended Use of the Contraceptive Implant: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Clinicians

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators of Extended Use of the Contraceptive Implant: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Clinicians","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the etonogestrel </span>contraceptive implant for 3 years of use. Evidence suggests that it may be used for up to 5 years for pregnancy prevention, also known as extended use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a national cross-sectional survey among a group of reproductive health clinicians. We developed an online survey using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and distributed it through e-mail listservs and social media groups from May to June 2021. We analyzed results using multivariable logistical regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 300 respondents, 195 (65.0%) reported that they always offer extended use, and 50 (16.7%) reported that they sometimes offer extended use. Fifty-five respondents (18.3%) reported that they never offer extended use. After adjusting for age, gender, and clinical setting, we found that complex family planning sub-specialists (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 9.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.81, 48.03]) and family medicine<span><span> physicians (aOR = 4.37, 95% CI [1.58, 12.10]) were significantly more likely to recommend extended use compared with general obstetrics<span> and gynecology (OBGYN) physicians. Clinicians from private practices or health maintenance organizations were significantly less likely to offer extended use than those from academic centers (aOR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.07, 0.51]; aOR = 0.06, 95% CI [0.01, 0.31]). The most common barriers to offering extended use were concerns about </span></span>pregnancy risk, bleeding, and lack of FDA approval past 3 years. Meanwhile, clinicians identified strong published evidence supporting extended use as a key facilitator for offering it, and they perceived that prior counseling on extended use from a past clinician was a key facilitator for patients to adopt it.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>One-third of clinicians in this study did not consistently offer extended use of the contraceptive implant. An opportunity exists to expand access to extended use by focusing on education interventions for clinicians and seeking FDA approval for 5 years of use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386724000410","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the etonogestrel contraceptive implant for 3 years of use. Evidence suggests that it may be used for up to 5 years for pregnancy prevention, also known as extended use.

Methods

We conducted a national cross-sectional survey among a group of reproductive health clinicians. We developed an online survey using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and distributed it through e-mail listservs and social media groups from May to June 2021. We analyzed results using multivariable logistical regression.

Results

Among the 300 respondents, 195 (65.0%) reported that they always offer extended use, and 50 (16.7%) reported that they sometimes offer extended use. Fifty-five respondents (18.3%) reported that they never offer extended use. After adjusting for age, gender, and clinical setting, we found that complex family planning sub-specialists (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 9.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.81, 48.03]) and family medicine physicians (aOR = 4.37, 95% CI [1.58, 12.10]) were significantly more likely to recommend extended use compared with general obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) physicians. Clinicians from private practices or health maintenance organizations were significantly less likely to offer extended use than those from academic centers (aOR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.07, 0.51]; aOR = 0.06, 95% CI [0.01, 0.31]). The most common barriers to offering extended use were concerns about pregnancy risk, bleeding, and lack of FDA approval past 3 years. Meanwhile, clinicians identified strong published evidence supporting extended use as a key facilitator for offering it, and they perceived that prior counseling on extended use from a past clinician was a key facilitator for patients to adopt it.

Conclusions

One-third of clinicians in this study did not consistently offer extended use of the contraceptive implant. An opportunity exists to expand access to extended use by focusing on education interventions for clinicians and seeking FDA approval for 5 years of use.

延长使用避孕植入物的障碍和促进因素:临床医生横断面调查。
背景:美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准依托孕烯避孕植入物的使用期限为 3 年。有证据表明,它可用于避孕长达 5 年,也称为延长使用期:我们对一组生殖健康临床医生进行了一次全国性横断面调查。我们使用 "实施研究综合框架"(CFIR)开发了一项在线调查,并于 2021 年 5 月至 6 月通过电子邮件列表服务和社交媒体群组进行了发布。我们使用多变量逻辑回归对结果进行了分析:在 300 名受访者中,195 人(65.0%)表示他们总是提供扩展使用,50 人(16.7%)表示他们有时提供扩展使用。55 名受访者(18.3%)表示他们从不提供延长使用时间的服务。在对年龄、性别和临床环境进行调整后,我们发现与普通妇产科(OBGYN)医生相比,复合计划生育亚专科医生(调整后的几率比 [aOR] = 9.32;95% 置信区间 [CI] [1.81,48.03])和全科医生(aOR = 4.37,95% CI [1.58,12.10])更倾向于推荐延长使用时间。私人诊所或健康维护组织的临床医生提供延长用药的可能性明显低于学术中心的临床医生(aOR = 0.19,95% CI [0.07,0.51];aOR = 0.06,95% CI [0.01,0.31])。提供延期使用最常见的障碍是担心妊娠风险、出血以及过去 3 年未获得 FDA 批准。同时,临床医生认为,已发表的支持延长用药时间的有力证据是提供延长用药时间的主要促进因素,他们认为,过去的临床医生就延长用药时间提供的咨询是患者采用延长用药时间的主要促进因素:本研究中三分之一的临床医生没有坚持提供避孕植入物的延长使用。通过重点对临床医生进行教育干预,并寻求美国食品及药物管理局批准 5 年使用期,扩大延长使用期的机会是存在的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信