Clear neuroimaging margin at the brain-tumor interface is associated with gross total resection and longer survival in non-enhancing diffuse gliomas.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anand A Dharia, Domenico A Gattozzi, Joseph S Domino, Adam G Rouse, Roukoz B Chamoun
{"title":"Clear neuroimaging margin at the brain-tumor interface is associated with gross total resection and longer survival in non-enhancing diffuse gliomas.","authors":"Anand A Dharia, Domenico A Gattozzi, Joseph S Domino, Adam G Rouse, Roukoz B Chamoun","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06221-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether the presence of distinct glioma margins on preoperative imaging is correlated with improved intraoperative identification of tumor-brain interfaces and overall improved surgical outcomes of non-enhancing gliomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of all primary glioma resections at our institution between 2000-2020. Tumors with contrast enhancement or with final pathology other than diffuse infiltrative glial neoplasm (WHO II or WHO III) were excluded. Tumors were stratified into two groups: those with distinct radiographical borders between tumor and brain, and those with ill-defined radiographical margins. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the impact of clear preoperative margins on the primary outcome of gross-total resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the study period, 59 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 31 (53%) had distinct margins. These patients were predominantly younger (37.6 vs. 48.1 years, P=0.007). Tumor and other patient characteristics were similar in both cohorts, including gender, laterality, size, location, tumor type, grade, and surgical adjuncts utilized (P>0.05). Multivariate regression identified that distinct preoperative margins correlated with increased rates of gross total resection (P=0.02). Distinct margins on preoperative neuroimaging also correlated positively with surgeon identification of intra-operative margins (P<0.0001), fewer deaths over the study period (P=0.01), and longer overall survival (P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Distinct glioma-parenchyma margins on preoperative imaging are associated with improved surgical resection for diffuse gliomas, as distinct margins may correlate with distinguishable glioma-brain interfaces intraoperatively. Further prospective studies may discover additional clinical uses for these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06221-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine whether the presence of distinct glioma margins on preoperative imaging is correlated with improved intraoperative identification of tumor-brain interfaces and overall improved surgical outcomes of non-enhancing gliomas.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of all primary glioma resections at our institution between 2000-2020. Tumors with contrast enhancement or with final pathology other than diffuse infiltrative glial neoplasm (WHO II or WHO III) were excluded. Tumors were stratified into two groups: those with distinct radiographical borders between tumor and brain, and those with ill-defined radiographical margins. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the impact of clear preoperative margins on the primary outcome of gross-total resection.

Results: Within the study period, 59 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 31 (53%) had distinct margins. These patients were predominantly younger (37.6 vs. 48.1 years, P=0.007). Tumor and other patient characteristics were similar in both cohorts, including gender, laterality, size, location, tumor type, grade, and surgical adjuncts utilized (P>0.05). Multivariate regression identified that distinct preoperative margins correlated with increased rates of gross total resection (P=0.02). Distinct margins on preoperative neuroimaging also correlated positively with surgeon identification of intra-operative margins (P<0.0001), fewer deaths over the study period (P=0.01), and longer overall survival (P=0.03).

Conclusions: Distinct glioma-parenchyma margins on preoperative imaging are associated with improved surgical resection for diffuse gliomas, as distinct margins may correlate with distinguishable glioma-brain interfaces intraoperatively. Further prospective studies may discover additional clinical uses for these findings.

在非增强型弥漫性胶质瘤中,脑瘤界面清晰的神经影像学边缘与大体全切除和较长的生存期有关。
背景:本研究旨在确定术前成像中出现明显的胶质瘤边缘是否与术中更好地识别肿瘤-脑界面以及整体改善非增强型胶质瘤的手术效果相关:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为 2000-2020 年间在本院进行的所有原发性胶质瘤切除术。对比剂增强的肿瘤或最终病理结果为弥漫浸润性胶质瘤(WHO II或WHO III)以外的肿瘤均被排除在外。肿瘤被分为两组:肿瘤和大脑之间有明显放射学边界的肿瘤和放射学边缘不明确的肿瘤。研究人员进行了多变量分析,以确定术前边缘清晰对大体全切这一主要结果的影响:在研究期间,有59名患者符合纳入标准,其中31人(53%)的边缘清晰。这些患者主要更年轻(37.6 岁对 48.1 岁,P=0.007)。两组患者的肿瘤和其他特征相似,包括性别、侧位、大小、位置、肿瘤类型、分级和使用的手术辅助手段(P>0.05)。多变量回归发现,术前边缘明显与大体全切除率增加相关(P=0.02)。术前神经影像学检查发现的明显边缘也与外科医生对术中边缘的识别呈正相关(PC结论:术前成像中胶质瘤-实质边缘的分明与弥漫性胶质瘤手术切除率的提高有关,因为分明的边缘可能与术中可分辨的胶质瘤-脑界面相关。进一步的前瞻性研究可能会发现这些发现的其他临床用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信