"Pitching" posttraumatic stress disorder treatment: A qualitative study of how providers discuss evidence-based psychotherapies with patients.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Katinka Hooyer, Jessica Hamblen, Shannon M Kehle-Forbes, Sadie E Larsen
{"title":"\"Pitching\" posttraumatic stress disorder treatment: A qualitative study of how providers discuss evidence-based psychotherapies with patients.","authors":"Katinka Hooyer, Jessica Hamblen, Shannon M Kehle-Forbes, Sadie E Larsen","doi":"10.1002/jts.23058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The two widely available evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure. Although the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has invested in intensive clinical training to provide these first-line treatments, most military veterans do not receive these therapies. Prior research indicates that patient interest and motivation depend on how patients are educated, and differences in how information is presented shape their decision-making. To our knowledge, no studies have addressed how clinicians \"pitch\" EBPs for PTSD and examined whether certain approaches are more effective than others. We recorded and thematically analyzed 25 treatment planning sessions across 10 VA sites in the United States to better understand how providers talk to patients about treatment options. Five themes were identified: using rich description, integrating various forms of questioning to engage the patient, sharing prior patient success stories, using inviting and direct language, and tailoring therapy talk to fit patient needs. Providers learning to offer EBPs can use these strategies to serve as a \"menu\" of options that will allow them to present EBPs in a way that appeals to a particular patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The two widely available evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure. Although the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has invested in intensive clinical training to provide these first-line treatments, most military veterans do not receive these therapies. Prior research indicates that patient interest and motivation depend on how patients are educated, and differences in how information is presented shape their decision-making. To our knowledge, no studies have addressed how clinicians "pitch" EBPs for PTSD and examined whether certain approaches are more effective than others. We recorded and thematically analyzed 25 treatment planning sessions across 10 VA sites in the United States to better understand how providers talk to patients about treatment options. Five themes were identified: using rich description, integrating various forms of questioning to engage the patient, sharing prior patient success stories, using inviting and direct language, and tailoring therapy talk to fit patient needs. Providers learning to offer EBPs can use these strategies to serve as a "menu" of options that will allow them to present EBPs in a way that appeals to a particular patient.

"推销 "创伤后应激障碍治疗:关于医疗服务提供者如何与患者讨论循证心理疗法的定性研究。
治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的两种广泛使用的循证心理疗法(EBPs)是认知处理疗法和长期暴露疗法。尽管美国退伍军人事务部(VA)已投资进行强化临床培训,以提供这些一线治疗,但大多数退伍军人并未接受这些疗法。先前的研究表明,患者的兴趣和动机取决于对患者的教育方式,而信息呈现方式的不同会影响患者的决策。据我们所知,还没有研究探讨过临床医生如何 "推销 "治疗创伤后应激障碍的 EBPs,以及某些方法是否比其他方法更有效。我们记录并专题分析了美国退伍军人事务部 10 个地点的 25 次治疗计划会议,以更好地了解医疗服务提供者如何与患者谈论治疗方案。我们确定了五个主题:使用丰富的描述、整合各种形式的提问以吸引患者、分享患者之前的成功故事、使用邀请性和直接的语言以及根据患者需求调整治疗谈话。学习提供 EBPs 的医疗服务提供者可以使用这些策略作为选择的 "菜单",使他们能够以吸引特定患者的方式介绍 EBPs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信