Effects of Integrating Nursing Early Warning Systems with Doula-Assisted Childbirth on Natural Childbirth Rates and Neonatal Outcomes: A Single Center Prospective Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Qi Luo, Binbin Xu, Miaohong Qian, Zhaie Lu
{"title":"Effects of Integrating Nursing Early Warning Systems with Doula-Assisted Childbirth on Natural Childbirth Rates and Neonatal Outcomes: A Single Center Prospective Study.","authors":"Qi Luo, Binbin Xu, Miaohong Qian, Zhaie Lu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of integrating nursing early warning systems with doula-assisted childbirth nursing on natural childbirth rates and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 150 women who underwent childbirth in the obstetrics and gynecology department of our hospital between September 2021 and March 2023 were enrolled as participants. They were randomly allocated into either the observation group or the control group, each comprising 75 individuals. The control group received standard nursing care, while the observation group received nursing early warning systems combined with doula-assisted childbirth nursing. Comparison between the two groups included modes of childbirth, the intensity of childbirth pain, neonatal Apgar scores, the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, duration of the first and second stages of labor, and maternal satisfaction with nursing care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicated a higher natural childbirth rate in the observation group compared to the control group (P < .05). Furthermore, the SAS score of the observation group post-nursing was significantly lower than that of the control group. Additionally, neonates in the observation group exhibited higher Apgar scores compared to those in the control group. Moreover, mothers who underwent natural childbirth in the observation group experienced lower childbirth pain scores and reduced postpartum hemorrhage incidence (P < .05). The duration of both the first and second stages of childbirth was shorter in the observation group than in the control group. Furthermore, overall satisfaction with care was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the effectiveness of implementing nursing early warning systems combined with doula-assisted nursing in enhancing maternal satisfaction, reducing postpartum hemorrhage, and improving maternal well-being and neonatal outcomes. The findings advocate for the widespread adoption of this intervention in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of integrating nursing early warning systems with doula-assisted childbirth nursing on natural childbirth rates and associated outcomes.

Methods: A total of 150 women who underwent childbirth in the obstetrics and gynecology department of our hospital between September 2021 and March 2023 were enrolled as participants. They were randomly allocated into either the observation group or the control group, each comprising 75 individuals. The control group received standard nursing care, while the observation group received nursing early warning systems combined with doula-assisted childbirth nursing. Comparison between the two groups included modes of childbirth, the intensity of childbirth pain, neonatal Apgar scores, the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, duration of the first and second stages of labor, and maternal satisfaction with nursing care.

Results: Our findings indicated a higher natural childbirth rate in the observation group compared to the control group (P < .05). Furthermore, the SAS score of the observation group post-nursing was significantly lower than that of the control group. Additionally, neonates in the observation group exhibited higher Apgar scores compared to those in the control group. Moreover, mothers who underwent natural childbirth in the observation group experienced lower childbirth pain scores and reduced postpartum hemorrhage incidence (P < .05). The duration of both the first and second stages of childbirth was shorter in the observation group than in the control group. Furthermore, overall satisfaction with care was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P < .05).

Conclusions: This study underscores the effectiveness of implementing nursing early warning systems combined with doula-assisted nursing in enhancing maternal satisfaction, reducing postpartum hemorrhage, and improving maternal well-being and neonatal outcomes. The findings advocate for the widespread adoption of this intervention in clinical practice.

护理预警系统与杜拉辅助分娩相结合对自然分娩率和新生儿结局的影响:单中心前瞻性研究。
研究目的本研究旨在评估护理预警系统与朵拉辅助分娩护理相结合对自然分娩率及相关结果的影响:方法:选取 2021 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在我院妇产科分娩的 150 名产妇作为研究对象。她们被随机分配到观察组或对照组,每组 75 人。对照组接受标准护理,而观察组则接受护理预警系统与朵拉辅助分娩护理相结合的护理。两组之间的比较包括分娩方式、分娩疼痛强度、新生儿阿普加评分、产后出血发生率、第一产程和第二产程的持续时间以及产妇对护理的满意度:研究结果表明,观察组的自然分娩率高于对照组(P < .05)。此外,观察组护理后的 SAS 评分明显低于对照组。此外,与对照组相比,观察组新生儿的 Apgar 评分更高。此外,观察组中自然分娩的产妇分娩疼痛评分较低,产后出血发生率也较低(P < .05)。观察组产妇第一产程和第二产程的持续时间均短于对照组。此外,观察组对护理的总体满意度明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < .05):本研究强调了实施护理预警系统结合朵拉辅助护理在提高产妇满意度、减少产后出血、改善产妇福祉和新生儿预后方面的有效性。研究结果主张在临床实践中广泛采用这一干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信