Clinical Use of Hematoma Volume Based On Automated Segmentation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Using 3D U-Net.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1007/s00062-024-01428-w
Takayuki Inomata, Koji Nakaya, Mikio Matsuhiro, Jun Takei, Hiroto Shiozaki, Yasuto Noda
{"title":"Clinical Use of Hematoma Volume Based On Automated Segmentation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Using 3D U-Net.","authors":"Takayuki Inomata, Koji Nakaya, Mikio Matsuhiro, Jun Takei, Hiroto Shiozaki, Yasuto Noda","doi":"10.1007/s00062-024-01428-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose a method for calculating hematoma volume based on automatic segmentation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) using 3D U‑net and investigate whether it can be used clinically to predict recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hematoma volumes manually measured from pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) images were used as ground truth data to train 3D U‑net in 200 patients (400 CT scans). A total of 215 patients (430 CT scans) were used as test data to output segmentation results from the trained 3D U‑net model. The similarity with the ground truth data was evaluated using Dice scores for pre and postoperative separately. The recurrence prediction accuracy was evaluated by obtaining receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the segmentation results. Using a typical mobile PC, the computation time per case was measured and the average time was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median Dice score of the test data were preoperative hematoma volume (Pre-HV): 0.764 and postoperative subdural cavity volume (Post-SCV): 0.741. In ROC analyses assessing recurrence prediction, the area under the curve (AUC) of the manual was 0.755 in Pre-HV, whereas the 3D U‑net was 0.735. In Post-SCV, the manual AUC was 0.779; the 3D U‑net was 0.736. No significant differences were found between manual and 3D U‑net for all results. Using a mobile PC, the average time taken to output the test data results was 30 s per case.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed method is a simple, accurate, and clinically applicable; it can contribute to the widespread use of recurrence prediction scoring systems for CSDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"799-807"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01428-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To propose a method for calculating hematoma volume based on automatic segmentation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) using 3D U‑net and investigate whether it can be used clinically to predict recurrence.

Methods: Hematoma volumes manually measured from pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) images were used as ground truth data to train 3D U‑net in 200 patients (400 CT scans). A total of 215 patients (430 CT scans) were used as test data to output segmentation results from the trained 3D U‑net model. The similarity with the ground truth data was evaluated using Dice scores for pre and postoperative separately. The recurrence prediction accuracy was evaluated by obtaining receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the segmentation results. Using a typical mobile PC, the computation time per case was measured and the average time was calculated.

Results: The median Dice score of the test data were preoperative hematoma volume (Pre-HV): 0.764 and postoperative subdural cavity volume (Post-SCV): 0.741. In ROC analyses assessing recurrence prediction, the area under the curve (AUC) of the manual was 0.755 in Pre-HV, whereas the 3D U‑net was 0.735. In Post-SCV, the manual AUC was 0.779; the 3D U‑net was 0.736. No significant differences were found between manual and 3D U‑net for all results. Using a mobile PC, the average time taken to output the test data results was 30 s per case.

Conclusion: The proposed method is a simple, accurate, and clinically applicable; it can contribute to the widespread use of recurrence prediction scoring systems for CSDH.

Abstract Image

基于使用 3D U-Net 自动分割慢性硬膜下血肿的血肿体积临床应用。
目的:提出一种基于三维 U-net 的慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)自动分割计算血肿体积的方法,并研究该方法是否可用于临床预测复发。方法:使用术前和术后计算机断层扫描(CT)图像手动测量的血肿体积作为基本真实数据,对 200 名患者(400 份 CT 扫描)进行三维 U-net 训练。共有 215 名患者(430 次 CT 扫描)被用作测试数据,以输出训练好的 3D U-net 模型的分割结果。使用 Dice 分数分别评估术前和术后数据与基本真实数据的相似度。通过获得分割结果的接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)来评估复发预测的准确性。使用一台典型的移动 PC,测量每个病例的计算时间并计算平均时间:结果:测试数据的 Dice 评分中位数为术前血肿体积(Pre-HV)0.764,术后血肿体积(Pre-HV)0.764:0.764,术后硬膜下腔容积(Post-SCV):0.741:0.741.在评估复发预测的 ROC 分析中,Pre-HV 的手动曲线下面积 (AUC) 为 0.755,而 3D U-net 为 0.735。在脊髓灰质炎后,人工 AUC 为 0.779,三维 U 型网为 0.736。在所有结果中,手动和 3D U-net 没有发现明显差异。使用移动 PC,每个案例输出测试数据结果的平均时间为 30 秒:结论:所提出的方法简单、准确、适用于临床,有助于 CSDH 复发预测评分系统的广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信