A survey of UK nurses about their care of people with malignant fungating wounds

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Susy Pramod , Jo Dumville PhD , Gill Norman PhD , Jacqui Stringer
{"title":"A survey of UK nurses about their care of people with malignant fungating wounds","authors":"Susy Pramod ,&nbsp;Jo Dumville PhD ,&nbsp;Gill Norman PhD ,&nbsp;Jacqui Stringer","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To gain an understanding of the nursing professionals who treat people with malignant fungating wounds (MFW) in the UK and their current practices, including perceived barriers and facilitators to providing MFW care.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>An online anonymous questionnaire was created with questions about the role of nursing professionals who reported caring for patients with MFW, the number of people with MFW they regularly cared for, treatment aims, treatments used, and challenges faced. These questions were developed with professional input and piloted. Using a convenience sampling method, we collected responses from UK nurses by distributing the questionnaire via social media and through relevant professional organisations. The questionnaire was constructed in QualtricsXM software and analysed using SPSS.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>We received 154 questionnaire responses, with three-quarters from tissue viability nurses and the rest from community and other specialist nurses. The most important treatment aim reported was pain management, followed by odour management. Almost all respondents used antimicrobial and standard dressings for these patients, with a range of products reported. Poor access to MFW care training and lack of local and national guidelines were reported as barriers to providing care for people with MFW. Availability of dressings, access to training, and good communication processes were reported as facilitators.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This is the first study to explore MFW wound care practices in the UK. A range of nurses are involved in care delivery with variations in the treatments used. Lack of access to MFW care training, resources, and standardised guidelines may impede care delivery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 102609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001078/pdfft?md5=ba2e757560be9b45c5cef0ddebc9b301&pid=1-s2.0-S1462388924001078-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To gain an understanding of the nursing professionals who treat people with malignant fungating wounds (MFW) in the UK and their current practices, including perceived barriers and facilitators to providing MFW care.

Method

An online anonymous questionnaire was created with questions about the role of nursing professionals who reported caring for patients with MFW, the number of people with MFW they regularly cared for, treatment aims, treatments used, and challenges faced. These questions were developed with professional input and piloted. Using a convenience sampling method, we collected responses from UK nurses by distributing the questionnaire via social media and through relevant professional organisations. The questionnaire was constructed in QualtricsXM software and analysed using SPSS.

Result

We received 154 questionnaire responses, with three-quarters from tissue viability nurses and the rest from community and other specialist nurses. The most important treatment aim reported was pain management, followed by odour management. Almost all respondents used antimicrobial and standard dressings for these patients, with a range of products reported. Poor access to MFW care training and lack of local and national guidelines were reported as barriers to providing care for people with MFW. Availability of dressings, access to training, and good communication processes were reported as facilitators.

Conclusion

This is the first study to explore MFW wound care practices in the UK. A range of nurses are involved in care delivery with variations in the treatments used. Lack of access to MFW care training, resources, and standardised guidelines may impede care delivery.

对英国护士护理恶性发霉伤口患者情况的调查。
目的:了解英国治疗恶性真菌性伤口(MFW)患者的护理专业人员及其当前的做法,包括提供 MFW 护理的障碍和促进因素:方法:制作了一份在线匿名问卷,其中的问题涉及护理专业人员在护理恶性真菌性伤口患者中所扮演的角色、定期护理的恶性真菌性伤口患者人数、治疗目的、使用的治疗方法以及面临的挑战。这些问题都是根据专业人士的意见制定的,并进行了试点。我们采用便利抽样法,通过社交媒体和相关专业组织分发问卷,收集英国护士的回复。问卷使用 QualtricsXM 软件制作,并使用 SPSS.Result 进行分析:我们共收到 154 份问卷,其中四分之三来自组织存活率护士,其余来自社区和其他专科护士。据报告,最重要的治疗目的是控制疼痛,其次是控制气味。几乎所有受访者都对这些患者使用抗菌敷料和标准敷料,产品种类繁多。据报告,难以获得手足口病护理培训以及缺乏地方和国家指导方针是为手足口病患者提供护理的障碍。敷料的可用性、接受培训的机会以及良好的沟通过程则被认为是促进因素:这是第一项在英国探讨中风湿性关节炎伤口护理实践的研究。参与护理工作的护士种类繁多,使用的治疗方法也各不相同。缺乏对产妇护理的培训、资源和标准化指南可能会阻碍护理的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society. The journal publishes the following types of papers: • Original research articles • Review articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信